Introduction. These Terms of Service (TOS) govern your use of the Xxxxx.xxx platform and all Services available through Xxxxx.xxx. The Services areoperated by Visma Software International AS, and provided to you by a distributor of Xxxxx.xxx (see Chapter 13); you purchase access to Xxxxx.xxx through such distributor, which in the following is referred to as “Visma”. The TOS apply between Visma and yourself, and detail Visma’s obligations towards you as a customer, and your obligations as a customer and end user of Xxxxx.xxx. The TOS use a number of capitalised terms, which are described in 14 or in the text. The TOS apply for all access to the Xxxxx.xxx Services, regardless of interface or integration used, including individual Services integrated with other software products from Visma, such as Visma Business or Mamut One. Certain parts of this TOS which specifically relate to interface or integration may not apply, depending on the interface or integration of the integrated Service.. If you do not agree with the TOS or do not have the necessary authority from your company to order and/or use Xxxxx.xxx, do not use Xxxxx.xxx, submit an order form or accept the TOS when presented. Accepted TOS constitute a binding agreement between your company and Visma, and is effective from the date TOS are accepted (see 2.4) by your company’s Primary Contact (see 3.6). The TOS and any additional terms are available from xxx.xxxxx.xxx/xx/xxxxxxx and will always include the date they were last changed.
Introduction. DKV EURO SERVICE GmbH & Co. KG (“DKV”) provides its customers with website functionality, products and services via the DKV website, applications and web services and the software provided for this purpose, hereinafter referred to in short as “eServices”. The general terms and conditions of use below govern the rights and obligations of the customer (“user”) regarding the use of the eServices provided by DKV. Right of use and access to content Subject to the condition that these general terms and conditions of use and applicable contractual supplementary conditions are complied with and that any fees due are paid, DKV grants the user restricted and basic rights to access and use the eServices; this right may not be transferred by sale or any other legal transaction. The user is not allowed to use data mining, robots or similar data capture and extraction programmes. DKV retains all rights that are not expressly granted to the user in these general terms and conditions of use. Neither the eServices nor any parts thereof may be reproduced, duplicated, copied, sold, resold or used in any other way for commercial purposes without DKV’s express consent in writing. The user undertakes not to misuse the eServices and to use them only as permitted by law. If the user does not comply with these general terms and conditions of use, the right to use the eServices granted by DKV will expire. The object of these general terms and conditions of use is the use of the eServices provided by DKV using an individual username and the associated password.
Introduction. Exposure estimation is an important part of risk assessment of environmental pollutants in food. Among the Swedish human population, food is the major source of exposure to persistent organic pollutants (POPs), such as dioxins (PCDD/DFs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and DDT-compounds. These compounds are lipophilic and accumulate in the lipid compartment of the human body. Due to the relatively high lipid content, breast milk is a good human matrix for analysis of POP levels. The POP levels in breast milk reflect the long- term exposure of the individual mother and also give information about the body burden of POPs at the time of pregnancy and nursing. In order to estimate the body burdens of POPs among pregnant and breast feeding women, and to estimate the intake of the compounds by breast feeding infants, the Swedish National Food Administration (NFA) has made recurrent measurements of levels of POPs in human breast milk. Another aim of this project is to establish if there are temporal trends of POP levels in breast milk. Temporal trends of PCBs and chlorinated pesticides between 1996 and 2003 have been reported earlier (Xxxxxxx et al. 2004). The established time trends are now revised with data from 2004. In addition, temporal trends for dioxins, furans, non-ortho PCBs and brominated flame retardants are established.
Introduction. The Government of the Kingdom of Sweden as well as the Headquarters, Supreme Allied Com- mander Transformation (HQ SACT) and the Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE), hereinafter referred to as the Partici- pants: Underskrift Bilaga
Introduction. Among the Swedish human population, food is the major source of exposure to persistent halogenated organic pollutants (POP), such as polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), DDT- compounds and polybrominated diphenylethers (PBDEs). These compounds are lipophilic and accumulate in the lipid compartment of the human body. The POP levels in body lipids therefore reflect the long-term exposure of the individual. Exposure estimation is an important part of risk assessment of POP in food. Due to the relatively high lipid content, mother’s milk is a good human matrix for analysis of POP body burdens at the time of pregnancy and nursing. In order to estimate the body burdens of POP among pregnant and nursing women, and to estimate the intake of the compounds by breast-feeding infants, the Swedish National Food Administration (NFA) has made recurrent measurements of concentrations of POP in mother’s milk from primipare women in Uppsala since 1996. Temporal trends of POP between 1996 and 2006 have been reported earlier (Glynn et al. 2007a, Xxxxxxx et al. 2008). The following report shows the results of analysis of POP (mono- and di-ortho PCBs, chlorinated pesticides and brominated flame retardants) in mother’s milk sampled in 2008. For some of the compounds, the temporal trends that were established earlier (1996-2006) are revised with the new data from 2008. During 2009 and 2010, a method for analysis of PCDD/Fs and non-orto PCBs will be established at the NFA. These substances will be analysed in milk samples from 2008 and reported in 2011.
Introduction. (154) Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement reads as follows: ‘Save as otherwise provided in this Agreement, any aid granted by EC Member States, EFTA States or through State resources in any form whatsoever which distorts or threatens to distort competition by favouring certain undertakings or the production of certain goods shall, in so far as it affects trade between Contracting Parties, be incompatible with the functioning of this Agreement.’ (155) The qualification of a measure as aid within the meaning of this provision requires the following cumulative conditions to be met: (i) the measure must be granted by the State or through State resources; (ii) it must confer an advantage on an undertaking; (iii) favour certain undertakings (selectivity); and (iv) threaten to distort competition and affect trade.
Introduction. (158) The measures must confer on Vy an advantage that relieve it of charges that are normally borne from its budget.
Introduction. (250) An aid scheme which was put into effect before the entry into force of the EEA Agreement and is still applicable constitutes an existing aid scheme within the meaning of Article 1(i) of Part II of Protocol 3, unless alterations have been made to the scheme which are considered to be substantial alterations which change the existing nature of the aid scheme so that it is turned into new aid.
Introduction. (30) The qualification of a measure as state aid requires that it confers an advantage to the recipient. An advantage, within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement, is any economic benefit that an undertaking could not have obtained under normal market conditions.
Introduction. (343) According to point 6 of the Annex, ‘reasonable profit must be taken to mean a rate of return on capital that is normal for the sector in a given Member State and that takes account of the risk, or absence of risk, incurred by the public service operator by virtue of public authority intervention.’