Additional Performance Measures Approved by the Institution’s Governing Body Sample Clauses

Additional Performance Measures Approved by the Institution’s Governing Body. Subdivision A 2 of § 23-38.97 of the Act provides that the institution “shall provide documentation substantiating that . . . the institution’s governing body has adopted performance and accountability standards, in addition to any institutional performance benchmarks included in the general appropriation act and developed pursuant to § 23- 9.6:1.01, against which its implementation of this additional authority [under Subchapter 3 of the Act] can be measured.” Attach a copy of the additional performance and accountability standards adopted by the institution’s governing body. Additional performance and accountability standards have been drafted and shared with the Secretary of Finance. See Attachment D for a listing of the proposed measures for each functional area in the management agreement. ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF VISITORS JUNE 10-11, 2005 PAGE Approval of the Minutes of the April 1-2, 2005 Board Meeting 6893 2007 Board Meeting Schedule 6893 Assignment of Pavilion III 6894 Annual Meeting, 2006 6894 Acceptance of Gifts and Grants Report 6896 Approval of the Commitment to Meet the State Goals Included in the Restructured Higher Education Financial and Administrative Operations Act 6898 Approval of the Board of Visitors to the Governor to Develop a Management the Commonwealth Negotiate with Agreement with 6900 Election of the Vice Xxxxxx 6903 Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxx, M.D./Xxxxxxx-Xxxxx Squibb Medical 6904 Imaging, Inc., Distinguished Professorship in Cardiovascular Medicine Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxx Distinguished Professorship in 6905 Molecular Physiology Approval of Amendment to a Permanent Access Easement 6907 at the Cavalier Electrical Substation Approval to Remove the Building at 000 Xxxxxxx Xxxx 0000 in Charlottesville Approval to Establish a New MBA Program Format: Xxxxxx 6908 MBA for Executives, Xxxxxx Graduate School of Business Administration ATTACHMENT A POLICY DISCUSSION The Board resumed its meeting, in Open Session, at 1:25 p.m.; all Members present at the meeting before lunch were present. The purpose of the meeting was the Board's customary policy discussion, the topic of which was the Restructured Higher Education Financial and Administrative Operations Act, the so- called "Charter Bill," which was passed by the General Assembly in its final - and as amended by the Governor - form on April 6th. The Board was called upon to approve the University's commitment to meet the goals specified in the Act, as well as to authorize the Univer...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Additional Performance Measures Approved by the Institution’s Governing Body

  • Performance Measures and Metrics This section outlines the performance measures and metrics upon which service under this SLA will be assessed. Shared Service Centers and Customers will negotiate the performance metric, frequency, customer and provider service responsibilities associated with each performance measure. Measurements of the Port of Seattle activities are critical to improving services and are the basis for cost recovery for services provided. The Port of Seattle and The Northwest Seaport Alliance have identified activities critical to meeting The NWSA’s business requirements and have agreed upon how these activities will be assessed.

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • SCHEDULE FOR PERFORMANCE REVIEWS 8.1 The performance of each Employee in relation to his/her performance agreement shall be reviewed on the following dates with the understanding that reviews in the first and third quarter may be verbal if performance is satisfactory:

  • Attainment on Performance Indicators The District will be responsible for overseeing the academic programs offered in its schools and ensuring that those programs meet or exceed state and local expectations for levels of attainment on the statewide performance indicators, as specified in 1 CCR 301-1.

  • Performance Measures The System Agency will monitor the Grantee’s performance of the requirements in Attachment A and compliance with the Contract’s terms and conditions.

  • CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE AUDIT The Contractor shall allow the Authorized User to assess Contractor’s performance by providing any materials requested in the Authorized User Agreement (e.g., page load times, response times, uptime, and fail over time). The Authorized User may perform this Contractor performance audit with a third party at its discretion, at the Authorized User’s expense. The Contractor shall perform an independent audit of its Data Centers, at least annually, at Contractor expense. The Contractor will provide a data owner facing audit report upon request by the Authorized User. The Contractor shall identify any confidential, trade secret, or proprietary information in accordance with Appendix B, Section 9(a), Confidential/Trade Secret Materials.

  • Quarterly Contractor Performance Reporting Customers shall complete a Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit I) for each Contractor on a Quarterly basis. Customers will electronically submit the completed Contractor Performance Survey(s) to the Department Contract Manager no later than the due date indicated in Contract Exhibit D, Section 17, Additional Special Contract Conditions. The completed Contractor Performance Survey(s) will be used by the Department as a performance-reporting tool to measure the performance of Contractors. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MyFloridaMarketPlace or on the Department's website).

  • Key Performance Indicators 10.1 The Supplier shall at all times during the Framework Period comply with the Key Performance Indicators and achieve the KPI Targets set out in Part B of Framework Schedule 2 (Goods and/or Services and Key Performance Indicators).

  • Performance Monitoring A. Performance Monitoring of Subrecipient by County, State of California and/or HUD shall consist of requested and/or required written reporting, as well as onsite monitoring by County, State of California or HUD representatives.

  • PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS Upon a particular Commission’s issuance of an Order pertaining to Performance Measurements in a proceeding expressly applicable to all CLECs generally, BellSouth shall implement in that state such Performance Measurements as of the date specified by the Commission. Performance Measurements that have been Ordered in a particular state can currently be accessed via the internet at xxxx://xxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx. The following Service Quality Measurements (SQM) plan as it presently exists and as it may be modified in the future, is being included as the performance measurements currently in place for the state of Tennessee. At such time that the TRA issues a subsequent Order pertaining to Performance Measurements, such Performance Measurements shall supersede the SQM contained in the Agreement. BellSouth Service Quality Measurement Plan‌ (SQM) Tennessee Performance Metrics Measurement Descriptions Version 2.00 Issue Date: July 1, 2003 Introduction

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!