ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION OF TENURED FACULTY Sample Clauses

ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION OF TENURED FACULTY. The performance of tenured Faculty Members is formally evaluated every three-years. The following pages describe the evaluation system for tenured Faculty.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION OF TENURED FACULTY. The performance of tenured Faculty Members is formally evaluated every three-years. The following pages describe the evaluation system for tenured Faculty. PURPOSE Evaluation of the Faculty’s performance provides both Faculty and Administrators with information they need to maintain the quality of the College’s educational process. Evaluation also provides Faculty with information that can be used in maintaining or improving the level of their teaching. This process is, therefore, intended to be both developmental and evaluative. Forms used to facilitate this process are found in Appendix A. GENERAL FEATURES OF THE SYSTEM Formal evaluation of tenured Faculty at the College differs each year in a cycle of three-years. In the first year of the cycle, the Faculty Member and evaluator plan the evaluation. In the second year, they conduct a formal evaluation. And in the third year, they meet to update the formal evaluation. The cycle then repeats. When this evaluation cycle is in operation, an Associate Xxxx or other evaluator in a given year will conduct planning meetings with one-third of his or her Faculty, formal evaluation conferences with one-third, and update conferences with one-third. Evaluators should notify Faculty Members at least ten working days before any of the meetings in the evaluation process. When a formal evaluation is not normally scheduled, a Faculty Member or the evaluator may request a formal evaluation. Procedures for accomplishing the evaluation process are explained in the following sections.

Related to ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION OF TENURED FACULTY

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Using Student feedback in Educator Evaluation ESE will provide model contract language, direction and guidance on using student feedback in Educator Evaluation by June 30, 2013. Upon receiving this model contract language, direction and guidance, the parties agree to bargain with respect to this matter.

  • Evaluation of Teaching 1. All reports on a teacher shall be in writing.

  • Specialist Schools Allowance Funding equivalent to that which a maintained school with the Academy's characteristics would receive in respect of their participation in the specialist schools programme. In the year of conversion, this may continue to be paid by the Local Authority;

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Evaluation and Comparison of Tenders 2.24.1 The Procuring entity will evaluate and compare the tenders which have been determined to be substantially responsive, pursuant to paragraph 2.22

  • Evaluation of Tenders 33.1 The Procuring Entity shall use the criteria and methodologies listed in this ITT and Section III, Evaluation and Qualification criteria. No other evaluation criteria or methodologies shall be permitted. By applying the criteria and methodologies, the Procuring Entity shall determine the Lowest Evaluated Tender. This is the Tender of the Tenderer that meets the qualification criteria and whose Tender has been determined to be:

  • EVALUATION OF TEACHERS 1. All reports on the work of a teacher shall be in writing.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.