BALANCED SCORECARD Sample Clauses

BALANCED SCORECARD. 9.1 The Service Provider’s overall performance of the Services and of the relationship between the Parties will be monitored through the implementation of a performance management scorecard (the “Balanced Scorecard”). 9.2 At the request of the Customer, the Service Provider shall work with the Customer to agree a Balanced Scorecard within four (4) months of the Effective Date. 9.3 The Service Provider shall produce the Balanced Scorecard on a quarterly basis for submission to the Steering Committee. 9.4 The information to be contained in the Balanced Scorecard is set out in Appendix 12-A to this Schedule.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
BALANCED SCORECARD. The Service Provider’s overall performance of the Services and of the relationship between the Parties shall be monitored using a performance management scorecard (the “Balanced Scorecard”).
BALANCED SCORECARD. The balanced scorecard, introduced by Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx (1992), is a decision support tool at strategic level. The authors were convinced that firm performance should not only be based on financial measurements like the ROI or payback period. Other elements, such as customer satisfaction, learning and development, should be taken into account during the evaluation of a firm. Including a wide range of performance measurements does not only improve financial results but also encourage a company to achieve its strategic goals. Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx proposed to include these four critical elements into their framework: mission, vision, strategic objectives and performance measurements (Xxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx, & Xxx, 1999; Van Grembergen, 2004). The BSC (Balanced Scorecard) perspective can also be applied to specific divisions in a company like the IT management. Xxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx & Tse (1999) have developed a BSC framework with the purpose to measure and evaluate IT projects and processes. The differences between IT management and corporate management are that the IT department is an internal division of the company; thus, IT projects are meant to satisfy both consumers and the internal organisation rather than only consumers. User orientation, business value, internal processes and future readiness are the perspectives implemented in the balanced IT scorecard. Through the application of a balanced IT scorecard, managers will be able to observe the positive and negative impacts of IT projects on relevant factors of the company. However, such an approach only provides good results if there is extensive dedication from stakeholders.
BALANCED SCORECARD. In supplementing the core targets and performance indicators set out below, you may wish to include your institution’s own quantitative and qualitative measures to evaluate progress against objectives, or to draw on those proposed in the DCMS Report Efficiency and Effectiveness of Government-sponsored Museums and Galleries (1999). Some examples are suggested under the ‘other measures’ heading in the table below.

Related to BALANCED SCORECARD

  • Historical Performance Information To the extent agreed upon by the parties, the Sub-Advisor will provide the Trust with historical performance information on similarly managed investment companies or for other accounts to be included in the Prospectus or for any other uses permitted by applicable law.

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Annual Performance Review The Employee’s performance of his duties under this Agreement shall be reviewed by the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors at least annually and finalized within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the annual audited financial statements. The Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors shall additionally review the base salary, bonus and benefits provided to the Employee under this Agreement and may, in their discretion, adjust the same, as outlined in Addendum B of this Agreement, provided, however, that Employee’s annual base salary shall not be less than the base salary set forth in Section 4(A) hereof.

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • Distribution and Pool Performance Information Item 1121(a) - Distribution and Pool Performance Information

  • Quarterly Contractor Performance Reporting Customers shall complete a Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit I) for each Contractor on a Quarterly basis. Customers will electronically submit the completed Contractor Performance Survey(s) to the Department Contract Manager no later than the due date indicated in Contract Exhibit D, Section 17, Additional Special Contract Conditions. The completed Contractor Performance Survey(s) will be used by the Department as a performance-reporting tool to measure the performance of Contractors. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MyFloridaMarketPlace or on the Department's website).

  • Staffing Levels To the extent legislative appropriations and PIN authorizations allow, safe staffing levels will be maintained in all institutions where employees have patient, client, inmate or student care responsibilities. In July of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of each agency will, upon request, meet with the Union, to hear the employees’ views regarding staffing levels. In August of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of Budget and Management will, upon request, meet with the Union to hear the employees’ views regarding the Governor’s budget request.

  • Claims Review Methodology ‌‌ a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject‌‌ to the Quarterly Claims Review.

  • CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE AUDIT The Contractor shall allow the Authorized User to assess Contractor’s performance by providing any materials requested in the Authorized User Agreement (e.g., page load times, response times, uptime, and fail over time). The Authorized User may perform this Contractor performance audit with a third party at its discretion, at the Authorized User’s expense. The Contractor shall perform an independent audit of its Data Centers, at least annually, at Contractor expense. The Contractor will provide a data owner facing audit report upon request by the Authorized User. The Contractor shall identify any confidential, trade secret, or proprietary information in accordance with Appendix B, Section 9(a), Confidential/Trade Secret Materials.

  • Performance Levels (a) The Performance Levels which apply to the performance by the respective Parties of their obligations under this Agreement are set out in Part 1 of Schedule 5. A failure by either Party to achieve the relevant Performance Level will not constitute a breach of this Agreement and the only consequences of such failure as between the Parties shall be the consequences set out in this Clause 5.6. (b) If the Operator does not comply with the Operator Performance Level then the Access Holder must pay to QR Network the amount determined in accordance with Schedule 5 as part of the invoice issued by QR Network for Access Charges and other charges for the Billing Period immediately following QR Network becoming entitled to that amount. Where there is no next Billing Period, the Operator must pay such amount to QR Network within fourteen (14) days after receipt of a Tax Invoice from QR Network. (c) If QR Network does not comply with the QR Network Performance Level then QR Network will credit to the Access Holder the amount determined in accordance with Schedule 5 by way of a deduction from the invoice issued by QR Network for Access Charges and other charges for the Billing Period immediately following the Access Holder becoming entitled to that amount. Where there is no next Billing Period, QR Network must pay such amount to the Access Holder within fourteen (14) days after receipt of a Tax Invoice from the Access Holder. (d) The Parties must, if requested by either Party, meet to review the Performance Levels subject to such review not occurring within six (6) Months after the Commitment Date or any previous review of the Performance Levels. If either Party notifies the other that it considers that the Performance Levels are no longer appropriate, the Parties may agree on varied Performance Levels and any associated variations to the Agreement including the Base Access Charges and the Train Service Description. If the Parties are unable to agree to such variations, then the existing Performance Levels shall continue to apply unless varied by QR Network in accordance with the provisions of Clause 5.6(e). (e) In the event that the Access Holder and/or the Operator (i) does not comply in any material respect with the Train Service Description; and (ii) the Access Holder fails to demonstrate to the reasonable satisfaction of QR Network when requested to do so, that the Access Holder will consistently comply with the Train Service Description for the remainder of the Term then, following consultation with the Access Holder, QR Network will be entitled to: (iii) vary the Train Service Description to a level it reasonably expects to be achievable by the Access Holder for the remainder of the Term having regard to the extent of previous compliance with the Train Service Description (ignoring, for the purpose of assessing previous compliance, any non-compliance to the extent that the non-compliance was attributable to a Railway Operator (other than the Access Holder) or to QR Network); and (iv) vary the Agreement (including, without limitation, the Operator Performance Level and the Base Access Charges) to reflect the impact of the change in the Train Service Description. (f) The Access Holder shall be entitled to dispute any variation proposed by QR Network pursuant to Clause 5.6(e) and such dispute will be referred to an expert for resolution in accordance with Clause 17.3.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!