Canada’s Arguments Sample Clauses

Canada’s Arguments. Canada argues that New Zealand’s claims fall outside the scope of Article 2.29(2)(a) altogether. According to Canada, Article 2.29(2)(a) is applicable only to product-focused conditions, limits, and eligibility requirements and only those that relate to the actual use of a TRQ when importing a good. 168. Canada explains the term “utilisation of a TRQ for the importation of a good” does not include the allocation phase of TRQ administration because the word “utilisation” in this context emphasizes the actual use of the TRQ for the importation of a good.123 169. This interpretation of the scope of Article 2.29(2)(a) is supported by the items in the illustrative list it provides (specification or grade, end use, package size), which are all product focused. Furthermore, because Canada’s pooling system in its Notices to Importers are entirely directed at who is eligible to apply for a quota and not any product-focused requirements, the pooling system falls outside the scope of 2.29(2)(a).
Sample 1Sample 2
Canada’s Arguments. Canada argues that the term “TRQ quantities” in Article 2.29(1) means the specified amount allocated or granted to individual importers, not the full amount of the TRQ.81 Therefore, Article 2.29
Sample 1Sample 2
Canada’s Arguments. For Canada, the important interpretative element is what is meant by the phrase “fulfils the importing Party’s eligibility requirements” in Article 2.30(1)(a). Canada notes that Article 2.30
Sample 1Sample 2
Canada’s Arguments. Canada’s principal objection to New Zealand’s interpretation lies with the phrase “an allocation” and with the interpretation of both words within that phrase. For Canada, the word “allocation” means a share of a TRQ that may be “granted to an individual applicant” that “provides the recipient certain rights, including the right to import [a] specified amount at the TRQ’s preferential rate.”52 According to Canada, the term “allocation” does not simply refer to a “portion” or volume of the TRQ and the “size of an allocation is indeterminate and irrelevant for the meaning of the term as used in Section D.”53 For Canada, this means that the Processor Clause does not concern the size of allocations or the proportionate amounts allocated to processors and non-processors, individually or as a group.54 According to Canada, “allocation” cannot have the broader meaning suggested by New Zealand of “a portion of the TRQ that may be granted to applicants (plural)–such as a processor pool.”55 For Canada, the distinction between an “allocation” and a “pool” turns on an “allocation” to a single applicant granting the right to import goods subject to the TRQ versus the reservation resulting from the pooling system, which creates an initially reserved volume of TRQ for a group of potential applicants, but does not grant anyone the right to import goods subject to the TRQ.56
Sample 1Sample 2

Related to Canada’s Arguments

  • Health Examinations The Employer shall provide at no cost to the employee, such medical tests, health examinations and surveillance/monitoring as may be required as a condition of employment and/or as a result of regulated hazards encountered after employment.

  • Litigation History There shall be no consistent history of court/arbitral award decisions against the Tenderer, in the last (Specify years). All parties to the contract shall furnish the information in the appropriate form about any litigation or arbitration resulting from contracts completed or ongoing under its execution over the year’s specified. A consistent history of awards against the Tenderer or any member of a JV may result in rejection of the tender.

  • Corporate Examinations and Investigations Prior to the Closing Date, the parties acknowledge that they have been entitled, through their employees and representatives, to make such investigation of the assets, properties, business and operations, books, records and financial condition of the other as they each may reasonably require. No investigations, by a party hereto shall, however, diminish or waive any of the representations, warranties, covenants or agreements of the party under this Agreement.

  • Eye Examinations All represented employees, who are health service system members, shall be eligible for one (1) annual VDT examination and prescribed eyewear.

  • Internships The Hospital may establish internships for the purpose of meeting future projected nursing shortages and/or providing career opportunities where there are no internal qualified candidates for job postings. In such circumstances, the implementation and guidelines of such an arrangement will be determined locally by the Hospital and the Union subject to the following: Internships are designed to develop the Hospital’s staff in order to fill positions for which there are currently no qualified internal candidates and/or for which shortages are predicted within a five (5) year period. Internships enable hospitals to maximize the use of qualified internal staff to meet their human resources needs, while at the same time providing career development opportunities for their employees. To provide direction to the local parties in developing and implementing internship(s) the Ontario Nurses’ Association and Participating Hospitals have agreed to the following principles: (a) The Hospital will establish the expectations for each internship opportunity; (b) There will be an open application process for internship opportunities; (c) The opportunities will be open to currently employed nurses who can demonstrate continuous learning, and a commitment to the Hospital; (d) Nurses who are selected for internship opportunities will commit to continued employment on a mutually determined basis; (e) Initiatives to support selected candidates may include but are not limited to: i) No loss of regular wages while attending a requisite course ii) Paid course fees iii) Paid time for clinical practicums in the Hospital or another clinical site iv) Any other initiatives, as agreed. (f) Part-time nurses will be credited with seniority and service for all such hours paid while participating in these initiatives as provided above.

  • Medical Examinations An employee may be required by the Employer, at the request of and at the expense of the Employer, to take a medical examination by a physician of the employee's choice. Employees may be required to take skin tests, x-ray examination, vaccination, inoculation and other immunization (with the exception of a rubella vaccination when the employee is of the opinion that a pregnancy is possible), unless the employee's physician has advised in writing that such a procedure may have an adverse affect on the employee's health.

  • Civil Actions Except where the Labour/Management Committee considers that there has been flagrant or wilful negligence on the part of an employee, the Employer agrees not to seek indemnity against an employee whose actions result in a judgment against the Employer. The Employer agrees to pay any judgment against an employee arising out of the performance of his/her duties. The Employer also agrees to pay any legal costs incurred in the proceedings including those of the employee.

  • Tax Examinations Abroad 1. A Contracting Party may allow representatives of the competent authority of the other Contracting Party to enter the territory of the first-mentioned Party to interview individuals and examine records with the written consent of the persons concerned. The competent authority of the second-mentioned Party shall notify the competent authority of the first-mentioned Party of the time and place of the meeting with the individuals concerned. 2. At the request of the competent authority of one Contracting Party, the competent authority of the other Contracting Party may allow representatives of the competent authority of the first-mentioned Party to be present at the appropriate part of a tax examination in the second-mentioned Party. 3. If the request referred to in paragraph 2 is acceded to, the competent authority of the Contracting Party conducting the examination shall, as soon as possible, notify the competent authority of the other Party about the time and place of the examination, the authority or official designated to carry out the examination and the procedures and conditions required by the first-mentioned Party for the conduct of the examination. All decisions with respect to the conduct of the tax examination shall be made by the Party conducting the examination.

  • Pending Proceedings and Examinations The Registration Statement is not the subject of a pending proceeding or examination under Section 8(d) or 8(e) of the 1933 Act, and the Company is not the subject of a pending proceeding under Section 8A of the 1933 Act in connection with the offering of the Securities.

  • Notice to Taxing Authorities and Insurance Companies The Seller shall transmit to the applicable taxing authorities and insurance companies (including primary mortgage insurance policy insurers, if applicable) and/or agents, notification of the transfer of the servicing to the Purchaser, or its designee, and instructions to deliver all notices, tax bills and insurance statements, as the case may be, to the Purchaser from and after the Transfer Date. The Seller shall provide the Purchaser with copies of all such notices within five (5) Business Days following the Transfer Date;