CEQA Findings. On April 26, 2012, by Motion No. 18588, the Commission certified as adequate, accurate and complete the FEIR for the LRDP Project, which includes the Cathedral Hill Project. On May 16, 2012, an appeal of Planning Commission Motion No. 18588 certifying the FEIR was filed with the Board and on March 12, 2013, by Motion No. M13-042, the Board rejected the appeal and affirmed the decision of the Planning Commission to certify the FEIR and found the FEIR to be complete, adequate, and objective, and reflecting the independent judgment of the City in compliance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and Chapter 31. On May 23, 2013, by Motion No. 18880, the Commission adopted findings, including a statement of overriding considerations and an MMRP, pursuant to CEQA. In accordance with the actions contemplated herein, the Commission has reviewed the FEIR, including the FEIR Addendum for the revised CPMC LRDP Project, and adopts and incorporates by reference as though fully set forth herein the findings, including the statement of overriding considerations, pursuant to CEQA, adopted by the Commission on May 23, 2013, in Motion No. 18880.

CEQA Findings. In coordination with City staff, Ascent will prepare CEQA Findings of Fact (Findings) and, if necessary, a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the City’s use. The Findings will specify mitigation measures incorporated into the project and will explain why other measures, if any, have been found to be infeasible. If applicable, the Findings will also identify feasible project alternatives that could reduce adverse environmental effects but are not being implemented, with an explanation as to why they are infeasible. Ascent will prepare an administrative draft of the Findings and will submit (electronically in Word) to the City for review and comment. Once comments are received, Ascent will incorporate comments and deliver an electronic file of the final Findings to the City.

CEQA Findings. On April 26, 2012, by Motion No. 18588, the Commission certified as adequate, accurate and complete the FEIR for the LRDP Project, which includes the St. Luke's Campus Hospital and MOB Project. On May 16, 2012, an appeal of Planning Commission Motion No. 18588 certifying the FEIR was filed with the Board and on March 12, 2013, by Motion No. M13- 042, the Board rejected the appeal and affirmed the decision of the Planning Commission to certify the FEIR and found the FEIR to be complete, adequate, and objective, and reflecting the independent judgment of the City in compliance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and Chapter

CEQA Findings. The proposed project may be found categorically exempt under Section 15311 (Accessory Structures) of the State Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 15311 allows construction or replacement of minor structures accessory to existing commercial, industrial, or institutional facilities, including but not limited to on-premise signs. There are no unusual circumstances creating the reasonable possibility of significant environmental effects. No cumulative impacts will occur as a result of the project. The project will not affect an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern and will not result in damage to scenic resources. The project is not located on a site which is included on any list of hazardous waste sites compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. Therefore, the project may be considered exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15311 of the CEQA Implementation Guidelines.

CEQA Findings. 10 On [_date_], by Motion No. [ ], the Planning Commission certified as adequate, 11 accurate, and complete the Final Environmental Impact Report (“FEIR”) for the Project 12 pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code 13 Sections 21000 et seq.) (“CEQA”). A copy of Planning Commission Motion No. [ ] is on 14 file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors in File No. [ ]. Also on [_date_], by 15 Motion No. [ ], the Planning Commission adopted findings, including a rejection of 16 alternatives and a statement of overriding considerations (the “CEQA Findings”) and a 17 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”). These Motions are on file with the 18 Clerk of the Board of Supervisors in File No. [ ]. In accordance with the actions 19 contemplated herein, this Board has reviewed the FEIR and related documents, and adopts 20 as its own and incorporates by reference as though fully set forth herein the CEQA Findings, 21 including the statement of overriding considerations, and the MMRP.

CEQA Findings. 1. The project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Public Resources Code §21000, et seq. and California Code of Regulations, A. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and policies, and with the applicable zoning designation and regulations. B. The project occurs within the Berkeley City limits on a project site of no more than five acres, and is surrounded by urban uses. C. The parcel within the project site have previously been developed and have no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. D. The project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality. City Standard Conditions would address potential impacts related to traffic, noise, air quality, and water quality. E. The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. 2. Furthermore, none of the exceptions in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply, as follows: (a) the site is not located in an environmentally sensitive area, (b) there are no cumulative impacts, (c) there are no significant effects, (d) the project is not located near a scenic highway,

CEQA Findings. If requested by the County, CONTRACTOR can prepare the CEQA findings for the project in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15091. The findings will include information related to whether those significant impacts identified in the EIR will be reduced to below a level of significance by mitigation measures identified in the document. If a significant and unavoidable impact is identified in the EIR, CONTRACTOR will prepare the Statement of Overriding Considerations. CONTRACTOR will provide an administrative draft of the CEQA findings for County DocuSign Envelope ID: B32F655A-1F58-4260-BE63-59FFA1D3E1D0 DocuSign Envelope ID: 6647E5DC-AF60-44C4-B978-D93C9BAD8ABA staff and legal review and comment, and then incorporate comments into a final document.

CEQA Findings. Proposed resolution finding that based on the lead agency Santa Xxxxxxxxx Water District’s (SMWD) December 20, 2013 Final Initial Study (as revised on February 5, 2014), Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP), and SMWD’s Resolution No. 2014-02-02 approving and adopting the MND and MMRP, the proposed project presents no new significant or substantially more severe environmental impacts beyond those already considered.

CEQA Findings Sample Clauses

Filter & Search