COACHES EVALUATION Sample Clauses

The COACHES EVALUATION clause establishes the process and criteria for assessing the performance of coaches within an organization or program. Typically, this clause outlines who is responsible for conducting evaluations, the frequency of reviews, and the specific metrics or standards used to measure a coach’s effectiveness, such as team performance, player development, or adherence to organizational policies. Its core practical function is to ensure accountability and continuous improvement among coaching staff by providing a structured framework for feedback and performance management.
COACHES EVALUATION. 10.1 Coaches will be evaluated annually separate from their evaluation as a teacher. If the coaching performance is in need of improvement or is unsatisfactory, the coach will be informed of the areas in need of improvement and the A.D. will provide suggestions to assist in the improvement. In the event that a coach will be removed from his/her position as a coach the coach will have an opportunity for a hearing prior to their removal.
View SourceView Similar (5)
COACHES EVALUATION. Varsity coaches will be evaluated annually during their season by the Athletic Director, using the instrument negotiated by the Administration and the Federation. Other coaches may be evaluated annually. Evaluation of a coach is confidential and the evaluation will be placed in the coach’s official personnel file kept in the office of the Superintendent of Schools. The following DESE-provided forms that will be adjusted as required to meet the specific needs of the Holliston Public Schools form the basis of the Educator Evaluation System described in detail in Article VI.
View SourceView Similar (3)
COACHES EVALUATION. 1. All coaches shall be evaluated annually by the Athletic Director to measure their performance in their specific sport. The evaluation shall be written and a signed copy shall be placed in his/her personnel file. 2. It is understood that the Athletic Director will disclose to any coach, performance difficulties when they arise, and offer the coach suggestions in order to bring the coach's performance up to standard. If the summative evaluation is unsatisfactory, the coach may not be renewed for the following year. 3. No coach shall drive students.
View SourceView Similar (3)
COACHES EVALUATION. Coaching positions shall be annual appointments and shall be posted accordingly. Coaches may receive written feedback by the high school principal or his/her designee. The Athletic Director shall facilitate such feedback. This written feedback shall not be placed in the bargaining unit employee’s personnel file.
View SourceView Similar (2)
COACHES EVALUATION. Position: Sport: Year: School: Evaluator: PLEASE CHECK 1, 2 OR 3 (1) Effective (2) Needs Improvement (3) Unsatisfactory
View SourceView Similar (2)
COACHES EVALUATION. Each coach shall be evaluated in writing once each season. The evaluation shall be completed at the end of the season. Copies of evaluation reports are maintained in a separate file in the office of the Athletic Manager.
View Source

Related to COACHES EVALUATION

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and ▇▇▇▇ them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following: A. Problems, delays, adverse conditions which may materially affect the ability to meet the objectives of an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, or preclude the attainment of Project Engineering Services units by established time periods; and such disclosure shall be accompanied by statement of actions taken or contemplated, and County assistance needed to resolve the situation, if any; and B. Favorable developments or events which enable meeting goals sooner than anticipated in relation to an applicable Work Authorization’s or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP ▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.