Compensation for Shared Interconnection Facility Sample Clauses

Compensation for Shared Interconnection Facility. 3.1. The transmission facility that connects Sprint and CLEC network is defined as the “Interconnection Facility.” The Interconnection Facility may be a shared facility used by both parties to originate and terminate traffic. 55.3.1.1. Notwithstanding any other provision to the contrary, if CLEC provides one-hundred percent (100%) of the Interconnection Facility via lease of meet-point circuits between Sprint and a third-party; lease of Sprint facilities, lease of third party facilities; or construction of its own facilities; the POI for the mutual exchange of traffic will be the Sprint office where the leased facility terminates. 55.3.1.2. CLEC may charge Sprint for Sprint’s proportionate share of the recurring charges for transport facilities leased from Sprint based on the percentage of the total traffic originated by Sprint (excluding any toll traffic, and ISP Bound Traffic). CLEC will bill Sprint an amount equal to a percentage of Sprint’s total interconnection facilities billing to CLEC at the same rates Sprint bills CLEC for those facilities. CLEC shall be financially responsible for any facilities, or portion of facilities, used to carry ISP-Bound traffic terminated by CLEC or toll traffic.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (16)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Compensation for Shared Interconnection Facility. 9.1. The transmission facility that connects Sprint and CLEC network is defined as the “Interconnection Facility.” The Interconnection Facility may be a shared facility. Notwithstanding any other provision to the contrary, if CLEC provides one-hundred percent (100%) of the Interconnection Facility via lease of meet-point circuits between Sprint and a third-party; lease of Sprint facilities, lease of third party facilities; or construction of its own facilities; the POI for the mutual exchange of traffic will be the Sprint office where the leased facility terminates. Should the facility provided by CLEC be used to terminate Sprint originated traffic, CLEC may charge Sprint for a proportionate amount of the facility charges based on Sprint’s relative usage for local traffic, excluding ISP-Bound Traffic, for a portion of the facility consistent with the section immediately below using (1) the lesser of Sprint’s cost-based dedicated transport rate or the actual lease cost of the interconnecting facility or (2) CLEC’s own cost-based rates if filed and approved the Commission in accordance with 47 C.F.R. 51.711(b).
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
Compensation for Shared Interconnection Facility. 60.9.1 The transmission facility that connects Sprint and CLEC network is defined as the “Interconnection Facility.” The Interconnection Facility may be a shared facility. Notwithstanding any other provision to the contrary, if CLEC provides one-hundred percent (100%) of the Interconnection Facility via lease of meet-point circuits between Sprint and a third-party; lease of Sprint facilities, lease of third party facilities; or construction of its own facilities; the POI for the mutual exchange of traffic will be the Sprint office where the leased facility terminates. Should the facility provided by CLEC be used to terminate Sprint originated traffic, CLEC may charge Sprint for a proportionate amount of the facility charges based on Sprint’s relative usage for local traffic, excluding ISP-Bound Traffic, for a portion of the facility consistent with the section immediately below using (1) the lesser of Sprint’s cost-based dedicated transport rate or the actual lease cost of the interconnecting facility or (2) CLEC’s own cost-based rates if filed and approved the Commission in accordance with 47 C.F.R. 51.711(b). 60.9.2 In the event that CLEC elects to offer service within Sprint’s serving area using a switch located outside Sprint’s serving area, CLEC agrees to provide the transport for both Party’s traffic outside Sprint’s contiguous serving area in which CLEC offers service, at no charge to Sprint. Sprint will not compensate CLEC for the shared interconnection facility beyond Sprint’s contiguous serving area in which CLEC offers service.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
Compensation for Shared Interconnection Facility. 40.10.1. The transmission facility that connects Sprint and CLEC network is defined as the “Interconnection Facility.” The Interconnection Facility may be a shared facility used by both parties to originate and terminate traffic. 40.10.1.1. Notwithstanding any other provision to the contrary, if CLEC provides one-hundred percent (100%) of the Interconnection Facility via lease of meet-point circuits between Sprint and a third-party; lease of Sprint facilities, lease of third party facilities; or construction of its own facilities; the POI for the mutual exchange of traffic will be the Sprint office where the leased facility terminates. 40.10.1.2. CLEC may charge Sprint for Sprint’s proportionate share of the recurring charges for transport facilities leased from Sprint based on the percentage of the total traffic originated by Sprint (excluding any toll traffic, Transit Traffic and ISP Bound Traffic). CLEC will xxxx Sprint an amount equal to a percentage of Sprint’s total interconnection facilities billing to CLEC at the same rates Sprint bills CLEC for those facilities. CLEC shall be financially responsible for any facilities, or portion of facilities, used to carry traffic transited by Sprint originated or terminated by CLEC, ISP-Bound traffic terminated by CLEC or toll traffic. 40.10.2. In the event that CLEC elects to offer service within Sprint’s serving area using a switch located outside Sprint’s serving area, CLEC agrees to provide the interconnection facility for both Parties’ traffic outside Sprint’s contiguous serving area in which CLEC offers service, at no charge to Sprint. Sprint will not compensate CLEC for the shared interconnection facility beyond Sprint’s contiguous serving area in which CLEC offers service. 40.10.3. Sprint is not obligated to utilize interconnection facilities provided by CLEC to terminate Sprint originated traffic to CLEC. 40.10.4. Should Sprint elect to provision its own transport to CLEC’s network to deliver its originated traffic or if CLEC elects to use Indirect Interconnection, there is no shared interconnection facility for which Sprint would compensate CLEC. Should Sprint elect to provision its own transport to CLEC’s network to deliver its originated traffic, Sprint reserves the right to only provision to the boundary of Sprint’s contiguous serving area in the LATA.
Sample 1See All (4)
Compensation for Shared Interconnection Facility. 3.1. The transmission facility that connects Sprint and CLEC network is defined as the “Interconnection Facility.” The Interconnection Facility may be a shared facility used by both parties to originate and terminate traffic.
Sample 1Sample 2
Compensation for Shared Interconnection Facility. 53.10.1. The transmission facility that connects Sprint and CLEC network is defined as the “Interconnection Facility.” The Interconnection Facility may be a shared facility. Notwithstanding any other provision to the contrary, if CLEC provides one-hundred percent (100%) of the Interconnection Facility via lease of meet-point circuits between Sprint and a third-party; lease of Sprint facilities, lease of third party facilities; or construction of its own facilities; the POI for the mutual exchange of traffic will be the Sprint office where the leased facility terminates. 53.10.2. Sprint shall make available to CLEC interconnection facilities that are used to exchange only Local Traffic at Sprint’s TELRIC-based rates. 53.10.3. Interconnection Facilities that carry both Local Traffic and non- Local traffic shall be leased at Sprint’s applicable access tariff rates. 53.10.4. The Parties agree, in recognition of the extensive local interconnection facilities in place as of the date of this Agreement and in operation for the past five years, to share the cost of such facilities during the term of this Agreement. For the interconnections facilities that are leased from Sprint, CLEC will invoice Sprint, on a quarterly basis, for only the portion of the interconnection facilities that is used to exchange Local and ISP-bound traffic. For this portion, CLEC shall charge Sprint for 50% of the rate that Sprint charged CLEC. For example, if CLEC purchases the interconnection facility out of Sprint’s tariff, CLEC shall charge Sprint for 50% of the tariff rate, but only for that portion of the facility used to exchange Local and ISP-bound traffic, subject to Sections 53.10.5, 53.10.6, and 53.10.7. 53.10.5. In the event that CLEC elects to offer service within Sprint’s serving area using a switch located outside Sprint’s serving area, CLEC agrees to provide the transport for both Party’s traffic outside Sprint’s contiguous serving area in which CLEC offers service, at no charge to Sprint. CLEC shall not xxxx Sprint and Sprint will not compensate CLEC for the shared interconnection facility beyond Sprint’s contiguous service area in which CLEC offers service.
Sample 1
Compensation for Shared Interconnection Facility. 55.4.1. 55.1.1. The transmission facility that connects CenturyLink and PAETEC network is defined as the “Interconnection Facility.” The Interconnection Facility may be a shared facility used by both Parties to originate and terminate traffic.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Compensation for Shared Interconnection Facility

  • Interconnection Facility Options The Intercarrier Compensation provisions of this Agreement shall apply to the exchange of Exchange Service (EAS/Local) traffic between CLEC's network and Qwest's network. Where either Party acts as an IntraLATA Toll provider, each Party shall xxxx the other the appropriate charges pursuant to its respective tariff or price lists. Where either Party interconnects and delivers traffic to the other from third parties, each Party shall xxxx such third parties the appropriate charges pursuant to its respective tariffs, price lists or contractual offerings for such third party terminations. Absent a separately negotiated agreement to the contrary, the Parties will directly exchange traffic between their respective networks without the use of third party transit providers.

  • Interconnection Customer Compensation If the CAISO requests or directs the Interconnection Customer to provide a service pursuant to Articles 9.6.3 (Payment for Reactive Power) or 13.5.1 of this LGIA, the CAISO shall compensate the Interconnection Customer in accordance with the CAISO Tariff.

  • Participating TO’s Interconnection Facilities The Participating TO shall design, procure, construct, install, own and/or control the Participating TO’s Interconnection Facilities described in Appendix A at the sole expense of the Interconnection Customer. Unless the Participating TO elects to fund the capital for the Participating TO’s Interconnection Facilities, they shall be solely funded by the Interconnection Customer.

  • Interconnection Customer’s Interconnection Facilities The Interconnection Customer shall design, procure, construct, install, own and/or control the Interconnection Customer’s Interconnection Facilities described in Appendix A at its sole expense.

  • Two-Way Interconnection Trunks 2.4.1 Where the Parties have agreed to use Two-Way Interconnection Trunks for the exchange of traffic between Verizon and PCS, PCS shall order from Verizon, and Verizon shall provide, the Two-Way Interconnection Trunks and the Entrance Facility, on which such Trunks will ride, and transport and multiplexing, in accordance with the rates, terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and Verizon’s applicable Tariffs. 2.4.2 Prior to ordering any Two-Way Interconnection Trunks from Verizon, PCS shall meet with Verizon to conduct a joint planning meeting (“Joint Planning Meeting”). At that Joint Planning Meeting, each Party shall provide to the other Party originating Centium Call Second (Hundred Call Second) information, and the Parties shall mutually agree on the appropriate initial number of Two-Way End Office and Tandem Interconnection Trunks and the interface specifications at the Point of Interconnection (POI). Where the Parties have agreed to convert existing One-Way Interconnection Trunks to Two-Way Interconnection Trunks, at the Joint Planning Meeting, the Parties shall also mutually agree on the conversion process and project intervals for conversion of such One-Way Interconnection Trunks to Two-Way Interconnection Trunks. 2.4.3 Two-Way Interconnection Trunks shall be from a Verizon End Office or Tandem to a mutually agreed upon POI. 2.4.4 On a semi-annual basis, PCS shall submit a good faith forecast to Verizon of the number of End Office and Tandem Two-Way Interconnection Trunks that PCS anticipates Verizon will need to provide during the ensuing two (2) year period to carry traffic from PCS to Verizon and from Verizon to PCS. PCS’s trunk forecasts shall conform to the Verizon CLEC trunk forecasting guidelines as in effect at that time. 2.4.5 The Parties shall meet (telephonically or in person) from time to time, as needed, to review data on End Office and Tandem Two-Way Interconnection Trunks to determine the need for new trunk groups and to plan any necessary changes in the number of Two-Way Interconnection Trunks. 2.4.6 Two-Way Interconnection Trunks shall have SS7 Common Channel Signaling. The Parties agree to utilize B8ZS and Extended Super Frame (ESF) DS1 facilities, where available. 2.4.7 With respect to End Office Two-Way Interconnection Trunks, both Parties shall use an economic Centium Call Second (Hundred Call Second) equal to five (5). 2.4.8 Two-Way Interconnection Trunk groups that connect to a Verizon access Tandem shall be engineered using a design blocking objective of Xxxx-Xxxxxxxxx B.005 during the average time consistent busy hour. Two-Way Interconnection Trunk groups that connect to a Verizon local Tandem shall be engineered using a design blocking objective of Xxxx-Xxxxxxxxx B.01 during the average time consistent busy hour. Verizon and PCS shall engineer Two-Way Interconnection Trunks using BOC Notes on the LEC Networks SR-TSV-002275. 2.4.9 The performance standard for final Two-Way Interconnection Trunk groups shall be that no such Interconnection Trunk group will exceed its design blocking objective (B.005 or B.01, as applicable) for three

  • Cost Responsibility for Interconnection Facilities and Distribution Upgrades 4.1 Interconnection Facilities 4.2 Distribution Upgrades

  • Interconnection Facilities 4.1.1 The Interconnection Customer shall pay for the cost of the Interconnection Facilities itemized in Attachment 2 of this Agreement. The NYISO, in consultation with the Connecting Transmission Owner, shall provide a best estimate cost, including overheads, for the purchase and construction of its Interconnection Facilities and provide a detailed itemization of such costs. Costs associated with Interconnection Facilities may be shared with other entities that may benefit from such facilities by agreement of the Interconnection Customer, such other entities, the NYISO, and the Connecting Transmission Owner. 4.1.2 The Interconnection Customer shall be responsible for its share of all reasonable expenses, including overheads, associated with (1) owning, operating, maintaining, repairing, and replacing its own Interconnection Facilities, and

  • One-Way Interconnection Trunks 2.3.1 Where the Parties use One-Way Interconnection Trunks for the delivery of traffic from Onvoy to Frontier, Onvoy, at Xxxxx’s own expense, shall: 2.3.1.1 provide its own facilities for delivery of the traffic to the technically feasible Point(s) of Interconnection on Frontier’s network in a LATA; and/or 2.3.1.2 obtain transport for delivery of the traffic to the technically feasible Point(s) of Interconnection on Frontier’s network in a LATA (a) from a third party, or, (b) if Frontier offers such transport pursuant to a Frontier access Tariff, from Frontier. 2.3.2 For each Tandem or End Office One-Way Interconnection Trunk group for delivery of traffic from Onvoy to Frontier with a utilization level of less than sixty percent (60%) for final trunk groups and eighty-five percent (85%) for high usage trunk groups, unless the Parties agree otherwise, Onvoy will promptly submit ASRs to disconnect a sufficient number of Interconnection Trunks to attain a utilization level of approximately sixty percent (60%) for all final trunk groups and eighty-five percent (85%) for all high usage trunk groups. In the event Onvoy fails to submit an ASR to disconnect One-Way Interconnection Trunks as required by this Section, Frontier may disconnect the excess Interconnection Trunks or bill (and Onvoy shall pay) for the excess Interconnection Trunks at the rates set forth in the Pricing Attachment. 2.3.3 Where the Parties use One-Way Interconnection Trunks for the delivery of traffic from Frontier to Onvoy, Frontier, at Frontier’s own expense, shall provide its own facilities for delivery of the traffic to the technically feasible Point(s) of Interconnection on Frontier’s network in a LATA.

  • NETWORK INTERCONNECTION METHODS 3.1 The Interconnection provided herein may not be used solely for the purpose of originating a Party’s own interexchange traffic.

  • Interconnection Customer Payments Not Taxable The Parties intend that all payments or property transfers made by the Interconnection Customer to the Participating TO for the installation of the Participating TO's Interconnection Facilities and the Network Upgrades shall be non-taxable, either as contributions to capital, or as a refundable advance, in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code and any applicable state income tax laws and shall not be taxable as contributions in aid of construction or otherwise under the Internal Revenue Code and any applicable state income tax laws.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!