Conservation Component Funding Security Sample Clauses

Conservation Component Funding Security. As further described in BRCP Chapter 9, Section 9.3, through the BRCP and this Agreement, the Implementing Entity will be responsible for the acquisition of lands as part of the conservation component of the Plan, which will be a part of the BRCP Conservation Lands system and administered, managed, and monitored by the Implementing Entity. The funds provided to acquire the conservation lands could come from a variety of sources, including funds administered directly by the Wildlife Agencies, as well as funds administered by other state and Federal sources. Additionally, other non-fee local funding sources could contribute to funding portions of the conservation component, including land acquisition by local land agencies, non-profits and foundations as well as funding through Butte County’s agricultural mitigation ordinance. If, after the exercise of all available authority and use of all available resources, state and Federal funds are unable to contribute to the Conservation Lands System, the Implementing Entity, the Permittees, and Wildlife Agencies will reevaluate the BRCP and work together to develop or identify an alternative funding mechanism. The Implementing Entity will track state and Federal funds progress toward the goal of contributing land, measured by the number of acres added to the BRCP Conservation Lands System, and will include a summary of the progress in each report it prepares under Agreement Section 9.1. State and Federal funds will be counted only toward that portion of the Conservation Lands System that contributes to the conservation and management of covered species and natural communities. If, for any acquisition of lands that are added to the Conservation Lands System, state or Federal funding is used to pay a portion of the overall acquisition costs, the number of acres counted toward this goal will be the portion of the total acres acquired that reflects the proportion of total acquisition costs paid with state or Federal funds.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Conservation Component Funding Security. As further described in BRCP Chapter 10, Section 10.2.2, through the BRCP and this Agreement, the Implementing Entity will be responsible for the acquisition of 59,399 acres of land1for the conservation component of the Plan, which will be a part of the BRCP Preserve System and administered, managed, and monitored by the Implementing Entity. The funds provided to acquire the 59,399 acres of land could come from a variety of sources, including funds administered directly by USFWS and CDFW, as well as funds administered by the Wildlife Conservation Board, the California Coastal Conservancy, California Department of Parks and Recreation, and other state and Federal sources. Additionally, other non-fee local funding sources could contribute to funding portions of the conservation component, including land acquisition by local land agencies, non- profits and foundations as well as funding through Butte County’s agricultural mitigation ordinance. If, after the exercise of all available authority and use of all available resources, state and Federal funds are unable to contribute 29,700 acres2 to the Conservation Lands System, the Implementing Entity, the Permittees, CDFW and USFWS will reevaluate the BRCP and work together to develop or identify an alternative funding mechanism. The Implementing Entity will track state and Federal funds progress toward the goal of contributing 29,700 acres, measured by the number of acres added to the BRCP Conservation Lands System, and will include a summary of the progress in each report it prepares under Agreement Section 9.1. State and Federal funds will be counted only toward that portion of the Conservation Lands System that contributes to the recovery of Covered Species or the

Related to Conservation Component Funding Security

  • COSTS DISTRIBUTED THROUGH COUNTYWIDE COST ALLOCATIONS The indirect overhead and support service costs listed in Schedule A (attached) are formally approved as actual costs for the 2012-13 fiscal year and as estimated costs for the 2014-15 fiscal year on a "fixed with carry-forward" basis. These costs may be included as part of the costs of the county departments indicated effective July 1, 2014, for further allocation to federal grants and contracts performed by the respective county departments.

  • ADMISSION REQUIREMENTS FOR SENIOR COLLEGE PROGRAM  The A.A. degree and a minimum GPA of 2.00  Grade of C or better in a credit-bearing mathematics course worth three or more credits*  Grade of C or better in freshman composition, its equivalent, or a higher-level English course* *(Effective 10/1/08, per University policy) Students who wish to transfer but do not meet all of the above requirements or are unable to enroll within two years after graduation will receive admission consideration under our standard transfer credit policies. Total transfer credits granted toward the baccalaureate degree: 60 Total additional credits required at the senior college to complete baccalaureate degree: 60 Total credits required for the B.A. in Global History: 120

  • Administrative Cost Recovery 3.1 In order to assist in the defrayment of the costs of administration and other expenses incurred by the Bank under this Agreement, the Bank may, following deposit of Contribution funds, deduct from such funds and retain for the Bank’s own account an amount equal to five percent (5.0%) of the Contributions.

  • C-TPAT In connection with providing Goods and Services to AGILENT, Seller shall comply with Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C- TPAT) or equivalent supply chain security measures. When requested by AGILENT, Seller shall demonstrate compliance by providing certification thereof to AGILENT.

  • Using Student feedback in Educator Evaluation ESE will provide model contract language, direction and guidance on using student feedback in Educator Evaluation by June 30, 2013. Upon receiving this model contract language, direction and guidance, the parties agree to bargain with respect to this matter.

  • Cost Responsibility for Interconnection Facilities and Distribution Upgrades 4.1 Interconnection Facilities 4.2 Distribution Upgrades

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!