Contestability. The contract is incontestable.
Contestability. No statement made by an Insured for the purpose of effecting any coverage or any increase in coverage under the Plan for such Insured will be used in contesting the validity of the coverage with respect to which such statement was made after such coverage or increase in coverage has been in force prior to the contest for a period of two (2) consecutive years unless the statement is contained in a written instrument signed by the Insured.
Contestability. If any amount paid to the Finance Parties under the Facilities Agreement or the Agreement and/or other Finance Documents meets (in the opinion of the Pledgee) the criteria under the applicable laws that it can be contested (in Slovak odporovaný) as a contestable transaction (in Slovak odporovateľný úkon) by a person competent to do so under the applicable laws, such sum shall not be deemed for the purposes of this Agreement as irrevocably paid.
Contestability. Any and all statements made to HPN by any Subscriber or Dependent, will, in the absence of fraud, be considered representations and not warranties. Also, no statement, unless it is contained in a written application for coverage, shall be used in defense to a claim under this agreement.
Contestability. In connection with any and all taxes and assessments that Lessee has agreed to pay by the terms hereof, Lessee may, if he shall so desire, contest the validity of any such tax or assessment, or seek to obtain a lowering of the assessed valuation of the Leased Premises, or any portion thereof, for the purpose of reducing any such tax or assessment. In such event, at the request of the Lessor, the Lessor at its own cost and expense may contest or litigate the amount and/or validity of such tax or assessment in cooperation with the Lessee and Lessee will execute any document which may be necessary and proper for such proceedings. By vote of two thirds (2/3) of the voting power of Lessee, Lessee may elect to assume control of such litigation, in which event Lessee shall be responsible for all necessary and proper costs and expenses of such litigation, including reasonable attorney’s fees. If required by Lessor, however, Lessee shall post a bond or other security acceptable to Lessor, which acceptance shall not be unreasonably withheld, to insure the payment by Lessee of such tax and all interest and penalties that may be assessed or imposed thereon. Any refund of taxes and/or applicable charges shall be the property of the Lessee to the extent to which it may be based upon any payment of taxes or assessments paid by the Lessee.
Contestability. Except for failure to pay premiums, We will not contest the validity of Coverage under The Policy after two years from The Policy Effective Date. Except for failure to pay premiums, We will not contest the validity of Coverage under any Certificate after two years:
Contestability. The contract may not be contested, except for nonpayment of Premium, after it has been in force for two
Contestability. Any employee or job applicant who receives a positive confirmed drug test result may contest or explain the result to the U.C.’s MRO within five (5) working days after written notification of the positive test result is received. If an employee or applicant’s explanation or challenge of the positive test result is deemed unsatisfactory by the MRO, the MRO will notify the U.C. The employee or applicant may submit information to the U.C. DER (designated employer representative) explaining or contesting the test results and why the results do not constitute a violation of the Company policy. If the employee or applicant’s explanation or challenge is unsatisfactory, the employee/applicant will receive written notification within fifteen (15) days after receipt of the explanation or challenge, explaining as to why the explanation is unsatisfactory. A copy of the drug test report may be requested and will be made available upon request. Any employee or job applicant whose explanation or challenge was deemed unsatisfactory has the right to appeal by undertaking an administrative challenge by filing a claim for benefits with the judge of compensation pursuant to Chapter 440, Florida Statutes; or if no workplace injury has occurred, the person may challenge the test result in a court of competent jurisdiction. The employee or job applicant has the responsibility of notifying the drug testing laboratory of any administrative or civil action brought pursuant to Chapter 440, Florida Statutes. The lab will maintain the specimen until the case or administrative appeal is settled.
Contestability. 15.1 The Parties acknowledge that, in accordance with the New South Wales Government service competition policy, non-core activities may be subjected to contestability against external service providers from time to time.
Contestability. The Insurer reserves the right to contest this Policy if any statement, answer or document(s) provided on Your application misrepresents or fails to disclose any facts material to the insurance. Except in cases of fraud, the Insurer shall not for the above reasons contest the Policy after it has been in force for 3 years from the Policy Issue Date.
