COUNTY/FDOT Review and Approval of Design Sample Clauses

COUNTY/FDOT Review and Approval of Design. The DEVELOPER shall complete and submit thirty (30), sixty (60), ninety (90), and 100 percent design plans to the COUNTY or the FDOT, as appropriate, for review and approval unless the FDOT or COUNTY agrees in writing to or have adopted an alternative submittal schedule. The DEVELOPER shall obtain approval of the 100 percent design and right-of-way plans for the Required Roadway Improvements from the COUNTY or the FDOT, as applicable, prior to commencement of any bidding of the Required Roadway Improvements. Any reviews and approvals by the COUNTY shall be completed by the COUNTY within thirty (30) days of submission by the DEVELOPER of complete and correct documents to the COUNTY. The COUNTY shall make a completeness review and notify the DEVELOPER within five (5) business days of receipt of the submission by DEVELOPER if not complete and correct. The DEVELOPER shall provide at the time of 100 percent design and right-of-way plan submission for the S.R. 54 Improvement Pipeline Projects (or sooner if required by other sections of this DA) an estimate of the cost of constructing the S.R. 54 Improvement Pipeline Projects, including inspection costs which shall be certified by an engineer duly registered in the State of Florida and approved by the COUNTY (hereinafter Cost Estimate). All plans, once accepted and approved for construction by the COUNTY or FDOT, as applicable, shall become the property of the COUNTY or FDOT.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
COUNTY/FDOT Review and Approval of Design. The DEVELOPER shall complete thirty (30), sixty (60), ninety (90), and 100 percent design plans for the S.R. 56 Extension and the Eastern Segment and shall be required to submit the design plans to FDOT for review and approval based on the previously approved PD&E, and to the COUNTY for review and approval for consistency with the terms and conditions of this Restated D.A. (2011) which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld by the COUNTY. The DEVELOPER shall be required to obtain approval of the 100 percent design and right-of-way plans for the S.R. 56 Extension from FDOT prior to commencement of any bidding of the S.R. 56 Extension and the same requirements will apply to the Eastern Segment. The 100 percent design and right-of-way plans shall include an estimate of the cost of constructing the applicable improvement in accordance with the design plans, including inspection costs, and shall be certified by the District engineer, who must be duly registered in the State of Florida (hereinafter the "Cost Estimate"). The Developer shall provide an updated Cost Estimate for the Eastern Segment prior to November 30, 2013. All plans, once submitted to the FDOT and COUNTY, shall become the property of the FDOT and COUNTY.
COUNTY/FDOT Review and Approval of Design. The DEVELOPERS have completed and submitted 100 percent design plans for Phase I and Phase II of XX Xxxxxxx West to the COUNTY or the FDOT, as applicable, for review and the DEVELOPERS have obtained approval of the 100 percent design and right-of-way plans for each Phase of XX Xxxxxxx West from the COUNTY or the FDOT, as applicable and therefore are entitled to commence the bidding of the XX Xxxxxxx West Improvements for each Phase. Any future reviews and approvals by the COUNTY shall be completed by the COUNTY within forty-five (45) days of submission by the DEVELOPERS of complete and correct documents to the COUNTY. The COUNTY shall make a completeness review and notify the DEVELOPERS within ten (10) business days of receipt of the submission by DEVELOPERS if not complete and correct. All plans once funded by the COUNTY, or once accepted and approved for construction by the COUNTY or FDOT, as applicable, shall become the property of the COUNTY and/or FDOT.
COUNTY/FDOT Review and Approval of Design. The County and/or DOT, as applicable, approved 100 percent design plans for the Mansfield Improvements prior to commencement of the Mansfield Improvements.

Related to COUNTY/FDOT Review and Approval of Design

  • Review and Approval Documents specified above must be submitted for review and approval by CITY Purchasing and Contracts prior to the commencement of work by CONTRACTOR. Neither approval by CITY nor failure to disapprove the insurance furnished by CONTRACTOR shall relieve CONTRACTOR of CONTRACTOR’S full responsibility to provide the insurance required by this Contract. Compliance with the insurance requirements of this Contract shall not limit the liability of CONTRACTOR or its sub-contractors, employees or agents to CITY or others, and shall be in addition to and not in lieu of any other remedy available to CITY under this Contract or otherwise. CITY reserves the right to request and review a copy of any required insurance policy or endorsement to assure compliance with these requirements.

  • ROAD WORK PHASE APPROVAL Purchaser shall obtain written approval from the Contract Administrator upon completion of each of the following phases of road work:  Drainage installation  Subgrade compaction  Rock compaction SUBSECTION RESTRICTIONS

  • Approval of Plans Landlord will not check Tenant drawings for building code compliance. Approval of the Final Plans by Landlord is not a representation that the drawings are in compliance with the requirements of governing authorities, and it shall be Tenant’s responsibility to meet and comply with all federal, state, and local code requirements. Approval of the Final Plans does not constitute assumption of responsibility by Landlord or its architect for their accuracy, sufficiency or efficiency, and Tenant shall be solely responsible for such matters.

  • Coordination of Design and Construction Contract Documents 5.5.1 Review model(s), Drawings, Specifications and other Construction Documents as they are developed by A/E during the Schematic Design, Design Development, and Construction Documents design phases of the Project.

  • Clinical Trials The studies, tests and preclinical and clinical trials conducted by or on behalf of, or sponsored by, the Company, or in which the Company has participated, that are described in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package or the Prospectus, or the results of which are referred to in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package or the Prospectus, were and, if still pending, are being conducted in all material respects in accordance with protocols, procedures and controls pursuant to, where applicable, accepted professional and scientific standards for products or product candidates comparable to those being developed by the Company and all applicable statutes, rules and regulations of the FDA, the EMEA, Health Canada and other comparable drug and medical device (including diagnostic product) regulatory agencies outside of the United States to which they are subject; the descriptions of the results of such studies, tests and trials contained in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package or the Prospectus do not contain any misstatement of a material fact or omit a material fact necessary to make such statements not misleading; the Company has no knowledge of any studies, tests or trials not described in the Disclosure Package and the Prospectus the results of which reasonably call into question in any material respect the results of the studies, tests and trials described in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package or Prospectus; and the Company has not received any notices or other correspondence from the FDA, EMEA, Health Canada or any other foreign, state or local governmental body exercising comparable authority or any Institutional Review Board or comparable authority requiring or threatening the termination, suspension or material modification of any studies, tests or preclinical or clinical trials conducted by or on behalf of, or sponsored by, the Company or in which the Company has participated, and, to the Company’s knowledge, there are no reasonable grounds for the same. Except as disclosed in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package and the Prospectus, there has not been any violation of law or regulation by the Company in its respective product development efforts, submissions or reports to any regulatory authority that could reasonably be expected to require investigation, corrective action or enforcement action.

  • REGULATORY FILINGS AND CAISO TARIFF COMPLIANCE 3.1 Filing

  • State Approval of Replacement Personnel The Engineer may not replace the project manager or key personnel without prior consent of the State. The State must be satisfied that the new project manager or other key personnel is qualified to provide the authorized services. If the State determines that the new project manager or key personnel is not acceptable, the Engineer may not use that person in that capacity and shall replace him or her with one satisfactory to the State within forty-five (45) days.

  • Submission and Approval The Contractor’s Submittals must comply with the Contract Documents. The Contractor shall review and approve all Submittals prior to submission. The Contract Documents shall specify when shop drawings or submittals require the seal of a specialty consultant. The Contractor shall submit copies of Submittals as required by the Contract Documents for the Work of the various trades. The Design Professional shall review, approve, or take other appropriate action with respect to shop drawings, samples, or other submissions of the Contractor, including, but not limited to, confirming conformance with the design concept of the Project and with the Contract Documents. The Design Professional shall respond to and return said items to the Contractor within fourteen calendar days from receipt provided that the Submittals are submitted by the Contractor in accordance with the required Submittal schedule. The Design Professional shall review and give comment or approval to Submittal schedule within fourteen calendar days from receipt. Large submittal documents may require longer review times, e.g., submittals with over fifty sheets of drawings. If, because of events beyond its reasonable control, the Design Professional is not able to meet the specified time period, then it is entitled to ask for additional time from the Owner. The Contractor shall make all corrections required by the Design Professional and furnish such corrected copies as may be needed. If the Contractor believes that any corrections required by the Design Professional constitute a change to the contract, the Contractor shall immediately notify the Design Professional and Owner and request instructions. By forwarding the approved Submittals to the Design Professional, the Contractor represents that the Contractor has determined and verified materials, field measurements, and field construction criteria related thereto, or will do so, and has checked and coordinated the information contained within such Submittals with the requirements of the Work and of the Contract Documents. The Design Professional’s approval of Submittals shall not relieve the Contractor from the responsibility for errors of any sort in Submittals or schedules. The Contractor shall perform no portion of the Work for which the Contract Documents require Submittals until the Design Professional has approved the respective Submittal. The Contractor shall maintain at the Site one copy of all approved Submittals.

  • Release of Design Plan The Engineer (1) will not release any roadway design plan created or collected under this contract except to its subproviders as necessary to complete the contract; (2) shall include a provision in all subcontracts which acknowledges the State’s ownership of the design plan and prohibits its use for any use other than the project identified in this contract; and (3) is responsible for any improper use of the design plan by its employees, officers, or subproviders, including costs, damages, or other liability resulting from improper use. Neither the Engineer nor any subprovider may charge a fee for the portion of the design plan created by the State.

  • Inspection and Approval All works embracing more than one process shall be subject to examination and approval at each stage thereof and the Contractor shall given due notice to the Engineer-in-Charge or his authorized representative when each stage is ready. In default of such notice the Engineer-in- Charge shall be entitled to appraise the quality and extent thereof.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!