Criteria for Appeal Sample Clauses

Criteria for Appeal. A disagreement or misunderstanding between one or more teachers and one or more members of the District administrative/supervisory staff, other than a grievance, may be resolved by using this Appeal Procedure. Any violation, misinterpretation, or inequitable application of any of the working conditions or other provisions of the Professional Agreement is defined as a grievance and will not be processed as an appeal. If an issue has been submitted as a grievance, that same issue may not be submitted as an appeal.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Criteria for Appeal. Appeals will be granted based on procedural concerns, specifically the following:
Sample 1
Criteria for Appeal. A disagreement or misunderstanding between one or more certified employee and one or more members of the District administrative/supervisory staff, other than a grievance, may be resolved by using this Appeal Procedure. Any violation, misinterpretation, or inequitable application of any of the working conditions of other provisions of the Professional Agreement is defined as a grievance and will not be processed as an appeal. If an issue has been submitted as a grievance, that same issue may not be submitted as an appeal.
Sample 1
Criteria for Appeal. (a) Disputes Over Contents of Position Description The Appeals Committee is empowered to resolve disputes over the contents of a position description. Where the members of the appeal committee have been involved in the resolution of a dispute over the contents of a position description, they are disqualified from membership for the appeals committee, should an appeal be lodged in relation to that position.
Sample 1

Related to Criteria for Appeal

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • Criteria for Selection a. The Sabbatical Selection Committee shall use four (4) criteria for selection of academic employees to receive sabbaticals. These are: the merit of the sabbatical project, the applicant’s current and previous contributions to the College community, the proposal’s relevancy to the College’s Strategic Plan and whether or not the applicant has had a previous sabbatical. In instances where these criteria are equal, seniority shall be the determining factor.

  • Criteria for Tenure A. The decision to award tenure to an employee shall be a result of meritorious performance and shall be based on established criteria specified in writing by the University. The decision shall take into account the following:

  • Additional RO Review Criteria (1) In addition to the requirements in Subparagraph 34A, the RO must:

  • Scope of Review I conducted my review in accordance with Thai Standard on Review Engagements 2410, “Review of Interim Financial Information Performed by the Independent Auditor of the Entity.” A review of interim financial information consists of making inquires, primarily of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters, and applying analytical and other review procedures. A review is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with Thai Standards on Auditing and consequently does not enable me to obtain assurance that I would become aware of all significant matters that might be identified in an audit. Accordingly, I do not express an audit opinion.

  • Classification Appeal Procedure An employee shall have the right to appeal, through the Union, the classification of the position the employee occupies, or where a point rating plan has been used, the right to appeal the position's level. Classification matters are not grievable under Article 8 of this Agreement. Instead, the following procedures shall be followed.

  • Criteria for Evaluation Criteria for employee performance review shall be made available to the employee before the start of the evaluation period and shall remain unchanged during the evaluation period unless the employee is made aware of the changes.

  • Duration of Review This Articulation Agreement shall be effective from the date of affixing signatures and is subject to annual review by all parties affixing signatures. Any changes must be written and reflected in a new agreement. If no changes are indicated by the annual review, continuance of this agreement will remain in effect until terminated. Either party may terminate this agreement immediately without cause on 90 days written notice. In the event this agreement is terminated, students who are impacted shall have the opportunity to obtain credit according to the terms herein. Morehead State University ( MSU ) Responsibilities MSU shall be responsible for: ● Ensuring all institutional policies apply to articulated credit courses. ● Ensuring articulated credit is properly documented on postsecondary transcript in accordance with this agreement. ● Providing KDE with current postsecondary primary point of contact information to be published for general inquiries related to this Articulation Agreement and notifying KDE when updates are applicable. Secondary School (K-12) Responsibilities Secondary School (K-12) shall be responsible for: ● Providing detailed information to students in writing (i.e., a syllabus) consistent with the public postsecondary institution policy, which shall include the nature of the course and the expectations and requirements that correspond to its official catalog description. Course requirement information must include course prerequisites, course content, grading policy, attendance requirements, course completion requirements, performance standards, information on adding and dropping courses and other related course information. ● Promoting articulated credit opportunities among qualified high school students, parents and high school faculty. ● Ensuring proper Technical Education Data System (TEDS) data entry is maintained to allow for student testing. ● Ensuring articulated credit documentation (e.g., high school transcript with state course codes identified, CTE EOP assessment certificate(s), industry certification certificate(s)) is provided to the student upon meeting requirements. This document was completed by: bdavis Digitally signed by bdavis Date: 2018.12.10 14:14:21 -05'00' Articulation Agreement Kentucky Department of Education And Xxxxxxxx State University In Reference to Production Crop Career and Technical Education End-of-Program Assessment Agreement Number: AG - 18-19 - 0008 Signature Page The Kentucky Department of Education (KDE) and Morehead State University ( MSU ) enter into this Articulation Agreement on this 10 day of December , 20 18 . This Articulation Agreement shall be effective from the date of affixing signatures and is subject to annual review by all parties affixing signatures. Any changes must be written and reflected in a new agreement. If no changes are indicated by the annual review, continuance of this agreement will remain in effect until terminated. Either party may terminate this agreement immediately for cause or may terminate without cause on 90 days written notice. In the event this agreement is terminated, students who are impacted shall have the opportunity to obtain credit according to the terms herein. In testimony thereof, witness the duly authorized signatures of the parties hereto: Kentucky Department of Education Xxxxx X. Xxxxx, Ph.D. Commissioner of Education Date Morehead State University signed by Xxx Xxxxxx 1/3/2019

  • Time Limits for Submission of Claim Failure by Purchaser to submit a Claim within established time limits shall relinquish the United States from any and all obligations whatsoever arising under the contract or portions thereof. Purchaser shall file such Claim within the following time limits:

  • Criteria for Promotion 24.04.01 For evaluating each application for promotion, the following general criteria shall apply:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.