Defensive Termination. In the event Licensee or any Licensee Affiliate initiates or maintains or in any other way participates in or has third parties initiate an Assertion against a Patent Owner and/or its Affiliates related to a Licensee Wi-Fi Essential Patent, and Licensee and/or Licensee Affiliate has refused or should be reasonably regarded as having refused to grant the relevant Patent Owner and/or its Affiliates a license on a reciprocal basis under such Licensee Wi-Fi Essential Patents upon which the Assertion is based, then such Patent Owner may provide written notice to Licensor of termination of the rights granted to Licensee under the Licensed Patents and Legacy CNS Patents it Holds. Upon receipt of notice of such termination, Licensor shall promptly notify Licensee (“Notice Of Termination”) and permit Licensee thirty (30) days to withdraw its Assertion in writing. If Licensee does not withdraw with prejudice its Assertion within thirty (30) days from the Notice Of Termination, then Licensor shall terminate, effective from the Notice Of Termination’s date, the rights granted under the Licensed Patent(s) and Legacy CNS Patent(s) such Patent Owner Holds, which Licensor shall communicate to Licensee accordingly. Following any such termination, Licensor shall provide Licensee with an updated illustrative list of Licensed Patents in Exhibit E, reflecting the removal of such Patent Owner and its respective listed Licensed Patents. For clarity, in such event, there shall be no adjustment of the Compensation.
Defensive Termination. (i) In the event that a Licensee initiates or prosecutes an Offensive Patent Proceeding (as the case may be) against a Non-Assertion Entity to which one or more Triggered Patents have been Transferred (whether or not such Non-Assertion Entity is a LOT User), then such Non-Assertion Entity shall, subject to the provisions of clause (ii) below, have the option to terminate the License granted to such Licensee (under Section 1.1(a)(i) only) with respect to the Triggered Patents that have been Transferred to such Non-Assertion Entity. If such Non- Assertion Entity is not a LOT User, it shall be an intended third party beneficiary of this LOT Agreement to the extent necessary to effect the termination set forth in the preceding sentence and to reinstate the terminated licenses in its discretion in accordance with clause (ii) below.
Defensive Termination. The Limited Technology Patent License (except with respect to Microsoft’s implementing services for, and providing services to, Yahoo! and its Authorized Affiliates) and the Optional Patent License (if it is acquired by Microsoft) are conditioned on Microsoft and its Affiliates not filing any judicial or administrative action for patent infringement against [*]. In the event of such an action, Yahoo! has the right to terminate the Optional Patent License and the Limited Technology Patent License (“Defensive Termination”). Upon any such Defensive Termination, and notwithstanding the licenses granted in Sections 2.3 and 2.4, Yahoo! shall have the same rights and remedies as Microsoft with respect to any patent infringement claim, including the right to seek damages for past infringement. Defensive Termination by Yahoo! shall not affect the Search Agreement or the performance or obligations of Microsoft thereunder.
Defensive Termination. 7.3.1 If one Party (“Asserting Party”) files a lawsuit: (or similar proceeding—e.g., an arbitration or administrative proceeding) for Patent infringement against the other Party for Party Activities occurring during the Term (or against a Distributor of the other Party for Distributor Activities occurring [*** Confidential Treatment Requested] during the Term or against a Customer of the other Party for use during the Term of a specific copy of a Covered Product or Excluded Product (other than a copy of an Excluded Product with respect to which the other Party did not receive Revenue)), then such other Party shall have the right immediately to terminate this Agreement by providing written notice to the Asserting Party.
Defensive Termination. 7.3.1 If one Party (“Asserting Party”) files a lawsuit for Patent infringement against the other Party for Party Activities within the Term (or against a Distributor of the other Party for Distributor Activities within the Term or against a Customer of the other Party for use of a Covered Product or Excluded Product during the Term), such other Party shall have the right immediately to terminate this Agreement by providing written notice to the Asserting Party.
Defensive Termination. If at any time Emulex [**]
Defensive Termination. If not prohibited by either: (i) the license covering any pre-existing materials included in any of the Software or Copyrightable Materials, or (ii) the Open Source License or the Open Copyright License to be used with any of the Software or Copyrightable Materials, either Party may include a defensive termination provision in such Open Source License or the Open Copyright License. Under such a provision, a Party can terminate or suspend any of the intellectual property rights granted in such Open Source License or the Open Copyright License to a third party if: (a) any intellectual property infringement claim or legal action is instituted by the third party against a Party; or (b) any claim or legal action alleging that the Software or Copyrightable Materials infringe any intellectual property rights is instituted by the third party against any licensees of the Software or Copyrightable Materials.
Defensive Termination. In the event Licensee or any Licensee Affiliate initiates or maintains or in any other way participates in, directly or indirectly via a third party, an Assertion against Sisvel or a Patent Owner and/or its Affiliates related to a Patent that is alleged to be an Essential Patent, Žƌ ƚŚĂƚ ŝƐ ďĞůŝĞǀĞĚ ŝŶ ^ŝƐǀĞů͛Ɛ Žƌ to be an Essential Patent, and Licensee and/or Licensee Affiliate has refused or should be reasonably regarded as having refused to grant the Sisvel or relevant Patent Owner and/or its Affiliates a license on a reciprocal basis under such Patent upon which the Assertion is based, then such Sisvel or Patent Owner may provide written notice to Licensor of withdrawal of its ĂŶĚ ŝƚƐ ĨĨŝůŝĂƚĞƐ͛ >ŝĐĞŶƐĞĚ WĂ2.ƚ2. ĞUpŶonƚreƐce ipĨt ƌŽŵ of notice of such withdrawal, Licensor shall promptly notify Licensee and permit Licensee thirty (30) days to fully dismiss with prejudice such Assertion, or have the relevant Licensee Affiliate or third party fully dismiss with prejudice such Assertion, in writing. If Licensee does not, or does not ensure that the relevant Licensee Affiliate or third party, fully dismiss with prejudice such Assertion within such thirty (30) day period, then Licensor may withdraw Sisvel or ƐƵĐŚ WĂƚĞŶƚ KǁŶĞƌ͛Ɛ ĂŶĚ ŝƚƐ ĨĨŝůŝĂƚĞƐ͛ ŐƌĂŶƚĞĚ ƚŽ >ŝĐĞŶƐĞĞ ĂŶĚ >2.2ŝwĐithĞimŶmƐedĞiaĞte͛efƐfec t, whĨichĨŝůŝĂ Licensor will communicate to Licensee accordingly. If Licensed Patents of Sisvel or a particular Patent Owner are withdrawn from the rights granted to Licensee under Section 2.2, Licensor will provide Licensee with an updated illustrative list of Licensed Patents in Exhibit E, reflecting the removal of such Sisvel or Patent Owner and its respective listed Licensed Patents.
Defensive Termination. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, a Member may terminate its license grant under Section 5.1 upon written notice to UCF in the event that any other Member or its Affiliates, or third party licensee of UCF asserts a claim of patent infringement against such Member with respect to the Necessary Claims, unless the Member, the Affiliate, or third party licensee of UCF asserting such claim fully withdraws such claim within ten (10) days of initially asserting such claim.
Defensive Termination. The license granted to You by Google under Section 3, and the license granted to You by all other VP8 Licensees and their Affiliates as part of the Reciprocal Release and License, shall immediately terminate upon initiation of litigation (including but not limited to cross-claims and counterclaims or other legal, equitable or administrative proceedings, e.g., before the U.S. International Trade Commission or comparable bodies in foreign countries) by You or Your Affiliate, if any, whether directly or indirectly through an exclusive licensee, transferee, assignee, agent or otherwise, or by any other Person if You or Your Affiliate have a direct financial interest in such litigation, against any Reciprocal Licensee, alleging that any implementation of the VP8 Format or any Licensed Product or combination of Licensed Products in the Licensed Field of Use constitutes direct or contributory infringement, or inducement of infringement, of any patent claim that must necessarily be infringed by the Exploitation of Licensed Products in the Licensed Field of Use. Accordingly, the license granted by You and Your Affiliates to a given VP8 Licensee as part of the Reciprocal Release and License shall immediately terminate if such VP8 Licensee's rights become subject to termination under the provisions of this Section 8 in the VP8 Patent Cross-License Agreement entered into by that VP8 Licensee. After termination of the licenses granted to You pursuant to the immediately preceding paragraph of this Section 8, You may not utilize the procedures of Section 2 to again become a VP8 Licensee. However, following final resolution of the litigation that resulted in such termination, upon written application to Google, Google may, in its sole discretion, permit You to again enter into this VP8 Patent Cross-License Agreement.
