Delay in Commissioning Sample Clauses

Delay in Commissioning. JPS shall cooperate with the Company to facilitate the testing and Commissioning in accordance with the Commissioning Schedule and each party shall make reasonable commercial efforts to avoid any undue delay in the testing and Commissioning.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Delay in Commissioning. Project Company covenants that Phase 1 shall be Commissioned on or before the Required Phase 1 Commercial Operation Date. If the Phase 1 Commercial Operation Date has not occurred by the Required Phase 1 Commercial Operation Date, the Project Company shall pay GPA, as liquidated damages, for the delay in Phase 1 Commissioning a sum equal to US$240,000 for each Day of delay or fraction thereof. With respect to any day after the Required Phase 2 Commercial Operation Date, Project Company will not be liable for Phase 1 delay liquidated damages to the extent it is paying Phase 2 delay liquidated damages for such day. Project Company covenants that Phase 2 shall be Commissioned on or before the Required Phase 2 Commercial Operation Date. If the Phase 2 Commercial Operation Date has not occurred by the Required Phase 2 Commercial Operation Date, the Project Company shall pay GPA, as liquidated damages, for the delay in Phase 2 Commissioning a sum equal to US$240,000 for each Day of delay or fraction thereof. In no event shall the damages assessed under this Article 9.1 exceed [US$40,000,000].
Delay in Commissioning. Project Company covenants that Phase 1 shall be Commissioned on or before the Required Phase 1 Commercial Operation Date. If the Phase 1 Commercial Operation Date has not occurred by the Required Phase 1 Commercial Operation Date, the Project Company shall pay GPA, as liquidated damages, for the delay in Phase 1 Commissioning a sum equal to US$ [ TBD ] for each Day of delay or fraction thereof. Project Company covenants that Phase 2 shall be Commissioned on or before the Required Phase 2 Commercial Operation Date. If the Phase 2 Commercial Operation Date has not occurred by the Required Phase 2 Commercial Operation Date, the Project Company shall pay GPA, as liquidated damages, for the delay in Phase 2 Commissioning a sum equal to US$ [ TBD ] for each Day of delay or fraction thereof. In no event shall the damages assessed under this Article 9.1 exceed [US$40,000,000].
Delay in Commissioning. (a) In case of delay in commissioning of the Project beyond SCOD until the date as indicated in Clause 5.13.1(c) above, as part of the liquidated damages, the Performance Security submitted by the Developer/s shall be computed on per- day-basis and proportionate to the balance capacity not commissioned. For example, in case of 190 MW Contracted Capacity, commissioning of 100 MW capacity is delayed by 18 days beyond the SCOD, then the liquidated damages shall be:
Delay in Commissioning. JPS shall in a diligent and timely manner cooperate with the Company and promptly carry out such reasonable actions as are required of JPS to facilitate the testing and Commissioning in accordance with the Commissioning Schedule and each party shall make reasonable commercial efforts to avoid any undue delay in the testing and Commissioning. In the event that JPS causes a delay in the Commissioning of the Facility of a period of fourteen (14) Days, the Required Commercial Operations Date shall be extended by each day of such delay commencing on the day immediately following the fourteenth day; provided that no such extension shall be granted to the extent a delay would have nevertheless been experienced had JPS been able to facilitate the testing and Commissioning in accordance with the Commissioning Schedule.

Related to Delay in Commissioning

  • Commissioning Commissioning tests of the Interconnection Customer's installed equipment shall be performed pursuant to applicable codes and standards. If the Interconnection Customer is not proceeding under Section 2.3.2, the Utility must be given at least ten (10) Business Days written notice, or as otherwise mutually agreed to by the Parties, of the tests and may be present to witness the commissioning tests.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Completion of Evaluation Cycle 1. The summative evaluation rating shall be based upon a preponderance of the evidence, assessed in a holistic manner, that is aligned to the Ohio Educator Standards. Only evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations that are conducted for the current school year may be used.

  • Proposing Integration Activities in the Planning Submission No integration activity described in section 6.3 may be proposed in a CAPS unless the LHIN has consented, in writing, to its inclusion pursuant to the process set out in section 6.3(b).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.