Delay in Commissioning Sample Clauses

Delay in Commissioning. JPS shall cooperate with the Company to facilitate the testing and Commissioning in accordance with the Commissioning Schedule and each party shall make reasonable commercial efforts to avoid any undue delay in the testing and Commissioning.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Delay in Commissioning. (a) In case of delay in commissioning of the Project beyond SCOD until the date as indicated in Clause 5.13.1(c) above, as part of the liquidated damages, the Performance Security submitted by the Developer/s shall be computed on per- day-basis and proportionate to the balance capacity not commissioned.
Delay in Commissioning. Project Company covenants that Phase 1 shall be Commissioned on or before the Required Phase 1 Commercial Operation Date. If the Phase 1 Commercial Operation Date has not occurred by the Required Phase 1 Commercial Operation Date, the Project Company shall pay GPA, as liquidated damages, for the delay in Phase 1 Commissioning a sum equal to US$ [ TBD ] for each Day of delay or fraction thereof. Project Company covenants that Phase 2 shall be Commissioned on or before the Required Phase 2 Commercial Operation Date. If the Phase 2 Commercial Operation Date has not occurred by the Required Phase 2 Commercial Operation Date, the Project Company shall pay GPA, as liquidated damages, for the delay in Phase 2 Commissioning a sum equal to US$ [ TBD ] for each Day of delay or fraction thereof. In no event shall the damages assessed under this Article 9.1 exceed [US$40,000,000].
Delay in Commissioning. Project Company covenants that Phase 1 shall be Commissioned on or before the Required Phase 1 Commercial Operation Date. If the Phase 1 Commercial Operation Date has not occurred by the Required Phase 1 Commercial Operation Date, the Project Company shall pay GPA, as liquidated damages, for the delay in Phase 1 Commissioning a sum equal to US$240,000 for each Day of delay or fraction thereof. With respect to any day after the Required Phase 2 Commercial Operation Date, Project Company will not be liable for Phase 1 delay liquidated damages to the extent it is paying Phase 2 delay liquidated damages for such day. Project Company covenants that Phase 2 shall be Commissioned on or before the Required Phase 2 Commercial Operation Date. If the Phase 2 Commercial Operation Date has not occurred by the Required Phase 2 Commercial Operation Date, the Project Company shall pay GPA, as liquidated damages, for the delay in Phase 2 Commissioning a sum equal to US$240,000 for each Day of delay or fraction thereof. In no event shall the damages assessed under this Article 9.1 exceed [US$40,000,000].
Delay in Commissioning. 4.7.1. JPS shall cooperate with the Company to facilitate the testing and Commissioning of the Complex in accordance with the Commissioning Schedule. 4.7.2. JPS shall in a diligent and timely manner cooperate with the Company and promptly carry out such reasonable actions as are required of JPS to facilitate the testing and Commissioning in accordance with the Commissioning Schedule, and each party shall make reasonable commercial efforts to avoid any undue delay in the testing and Commissioning. In the event that JPS causes a delay in the Commissioning of the Complex of a period of fourteen (14) Days, the Required Commercial Operation Date shall be extended by each Day of such delay commencing on the day immediately following the fourteenth (14th) Day; provided that no such extension shall be granted to the extent a delay would have nevertheless been experienced had JPS been able to facilitate the testing and Commissioning in accordance with the Commissioning Schedule. In the event of delay in reaching the Commercial Operations Date on or before the Required Commercial Operations Date, for reasons attributable to the Company, the Company shall pay liquidated damages in accordance with Clauses 10.4.

Related to Delay in Commissioning

  • Design Review ‌ (a) Where so specified in Schedule A (Scope of Goods and Services) or as otherwise instructed by the City, the Supplier shall submit design-related Documentation for review by the City, and shall not proceed with work on the basis of such design Documentation until the City’s approval of such Documentation has been received in writing. (b) None of: (i) the submission of Documentation to the City by the Supplier; (ii) its examination by or on behalf of the City; or (iii) the making of any comment thereon (including any approval thereof) shall in any way relieve the Supplier of any of its obligations under this Agreement or of its duty to take reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy and correctness of such Documentation, and its suitability to the matter to which it relates.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Proposing Integration Activities in the Planning Submission No integration activity described in section 6.3 may be proposed in a CAPS unless the Funder has consented, in writing, to its inclusion pursuant to the process set out in section 6.3(b).

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following: A. Problems, delays, adverse conditions which may materially affect the ability to meet the objectives of an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, or preclude the attainment of Project Engineering Services units by established time periods; and such disclosure shall be accompanied by statement of actions taken or contemplated, and County assistance needed to resolve the situation, if any; and B. Favorable developments or events which enable meeting goals sooner than anticipated in relation to an applicable Work Authorization’s or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto.

  • Constructability Review Prepare detailed interdisciplinary constructability review within Fourteen (14) days of receipt of the plans from the District that: 10.1.2.1.6.1 Ensures construction documents are well coordinated and reviewed for errors; 10.1.2.1.6.2 Identifies to the extent known, construction deficiencies and areas of concern; 10.1.2.1.6.3 Back-checks design drawings for inclusion of modifications; and 10.1.2.1.6.4 Provides the District with written confirmation that: 10.1.2.1.6.4.1 Requirements noted in the design documents prepared for the Project are consistent with and conform to the District's Project requirements and design standards. 10.1.2.1.6.4.2 Various components have been coordinated and are consistent with each other so as to minimize conflicts within or between components of the design documents.

  • Completion of Review for Certain Review Receivables Following the delivery of the list of the Review Receivables and before the delivery of the Review Report by the Asset Representations Reviewer, the Servicer may notify the Asset Representations Reviewer if a Review Receivable is paid in full by the Obligor or purchased from the Issuer in accordance with the terms of the Basic Documents. On receipt of such notice, the Asset Representations Reviewer will immediately terminate all Tests of the related Review Receivable, and the Review of such Review Receivables will be considered complete (a “Test Complete”). In this case, the related Review Report will indicate a Test Complete for such Review Receivable and the related reason.

  • Timeline Contractor must perform the Services and deliver the Deliverables according to the following timeline:

  • FINAL COMPLETION AND FINAL PAYMENT 9.9.1 Upon receipt of written notice that the Work is ready for final inspection and acceptance and upon receipt of a final Application for Payment, the Architect will promptly make such 9.9.2 Neither the final payment nor the remaining retained percentage shall become due until the Contractor submits to the Architect (1) an affidavit that all payrolls, bills for materials and equipment, and other indebtedness connected with the Work for which the State or its property might in any way be responsible, have been paid or otherwise satisfied; (2) consent of surety, if any, to final payment; (3) Other data establishing payment or satisfaction of all such obligations, including, but not limited to, receipts, releases, or other supporting documentation. and (4) final waivers of liens arising out of the Contract, to the extent and in such form as may be designated by the State. If any Subcontractor refuses to furnish a release or waiver required by the State, the Contractor may furnish a bond satisfactory to the State to indemnify him against any such lien. If any such lien remains unsatisfied after all payments are made, the Contractor shall refund to the State all moneys that the latter may be compelled to pay in discharging such lien, including all costs and reasonable attorneys' fees. 9.9.3 If, after Substantial Completion of the Work, final completion thereof is materially delayed through no fault of the Contractor or by the issuance of Change Orders affecting final completion, and the Architect so confirms, the State shall, upon application by the Contractor and certification by the Architect, and without terminating the Contract, make payment of the balance due for that portion of the Work fully completed and accepted. If the remaining balance for Work not fully completed or corrected is less than the retainage stipulated in the Contract Documents, and if bonds have been furnished as required by the Contract Documents, the written consent of the surety to the payment of the balance due for that portion of the Work fully completed and accepted shall be submitted by the Contractor to the Architect prior to certification of such payment. Such payment shall be made under the terms and conditions governing final payment, except that it shall not constitute a waiver of claims. 9.9.4 The making of final payment shall constitute a waiver of all claims by the State except those arising from: (a) unsettled liens, (b) faulty or defective Work appearing after Substantial Completion, (c) failure of the Work to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents, or (d) terms of any special warranties required by the Contract Documents. 9.9.5 The acceptance of final payment shall constitute a waiver of all claims by the Contractor except those previously made in writing and identified by the Contractor as unsettled at the time of the final Application for Payment.

  • Order Coordination and Order Coordination-Time Specific 2.1.9.1 “Order Coordination” (OC) allows BellSouth and Lightyear to coordinate the installation of the SL2 Loops, Unbundled Digital Loops (UDL) and other Loops where OC may be purchased as an option, to Lightyear’s facilities to limit end user service outage. OC is available when the Loop is provisioned over an existing circuit that is currently providing service to the end user. OC for physical conversions will be scheduled at BellSouth’s discretion during normal working hours on the committed due date. OC shall be provided in accordance with the chart set forth below. 2.1.9.2 “Order Coordination – Time Specific” (OC-TS) allows Lightyear to order a specific time for OC to take place. BellSouth will make every effort to accommodate Lightyear’s specific conversion time request. However, BellSouth reserves the right to negotiate with Lightyear a conversion time based on load and appointment control when necessary. This OC-TS is a chargeable option for all Loops except Unbundled Copper Loops (UCL) and Universal Digital Channel (UDC), and is billed in addition to the OC charge. Lightyear may specify a time between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. (location time) Monday through Friday (excluding holidays). If Lightyear specifies a time outside this window, or selects a time or quantity of Loops that requires BellSouth technicians to work outside normal work hours, overtime charges will apply in addition to the OC and OC-TS charges. Overtime charges will be applied based on the amount of overtime worked and in accordance with the rates established in the Access Services Tariff, Section E13.2, for each state. The OC-TS charges for an order due on the same day at the same location will be applied on a per Local Service Request (LSR) basis.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!