Determination of Effect. The NASA Center or Center CRM will make a determination of effect. In the event of a likely adverse effect, NASA will first consider whether the Project can be feasibly altered to avoid or minimize adverse effects.
Determination of Effect. The parties agree to use the definition of "likely to adversely affect" found in the Endangered Species Consultation Handbook (NMFS/USFWS, March 1998, p.3-13): " any adverse effect to listed species or critical habitat that may occur as a direct or indirect result of the proposed action Lynx Conservation Agreement-- USDA Forest Service & USDI Fish and Wildlife Service or its interrelated or interdependent actions" and such adverse effects are not discountable or insignificant. The Lynx LCAS will be used and referenced in all determinations of effect for lynx. It will be used as described in the LCAS in the section entitled "Approach to Development of Conservation Measures," and as provided for in current and future LCAS implementation guidance. The LCAS frames the preferred and advisable courses of action for conservation of lynx. Effects determinations will include consideration of local conditions and activities by local biologists using the LCAS and other relevant information sources. Effects determinations will also take into account modifications made to projects or plans that reduce or eliminate potential adverse effects to lynx. Documentation of effects determinations would occur in accordance with regulatory and agency policy for sensitive species or species listed or proposed for listing as endangered or threatened. Administrative units in each lynx geographic area (as defined in the LCAS) should consider working together to supplement the guidance in this section (C) with more specific tools, such as project screens, that could help insure consistency and accuracy in determination of effects.
Determination of Effect. The posting of this PA Memo on the Cultural Resources Information (CRI) website is required by Stipulation IV.E.2. of the 2011 Military Relocation PA as a means for interested members of the public to provide comments on the identification and evaluation of historic properties. Confidentiality requirements under the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) prohibit federal agencies from publicly disclosing the exact nature and location of archaeological sites and other types of historic properties such as traditional cultural properties (TCPs). Figure 1 FIGURE 2 ® 0 100 200Feet Meters 0 25 50 Clinic and Utility Locations J006 Clinic Utility APE Clinic GUAM project area PREPARED BY: Naval Facilities Engineering Command Marianas Date: 1/10/2019 Coordinate System: UTM Zone 55 North Projection: Transverse Mercator Datum: D WGS 84 If submitting via e-mail, scan and send to: xxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx If submitting via postal mail, send to: Attn: CRI Web Comments Code EV23, NAVFAC Pacific 000 Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxx 000 JBPHH, Hawaii 96860-3134 Submitted comments will be posted on the Navy's Cultural Resources Information (CRI) web site. Information presented on the CRI web site is considered public. The sections outlined in red are required to be completed in order for a comment to be posted. Privacy Act Statement Personal information will only be used to contact you regarding the comments you submit. This information will only be shared with another government agency if your inquiry relates to that agency, or as otherwise required by law. We will not create individual profiles or give your information to any private organization. While you must provide a valid e-mail address or postal address, please DO NOT include personally identifying information such as a social security number. By submitting this comment form, you agree not to include content that is offensive in nature, such as profanity, personal attacks on individuals, and racist or abusive language. PROJECT: J-006 Apra Harbor Medical/Dental Clinic – Revised APE SUBJECT: PA Memo #1, J-006 Apra Harbor Medical/Dental Clinic –APE for utility conduit trenching Date: Name: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CRI User Name (if you don’t want your real name to be posted with your comment on the CRI web site): _ E-Mail Address: _______________________________________________...
Determination of Effect. Considering the information contained in the "Programmatic Agreement Among the Department of Defense, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, the Guam State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands State Historic Preservation Officer Regarding the Military Relocation to the Islands of Guam and Tinian" dated March 9, 2011, the Navy has determined that this project will have no effect on historic properties and does not require further review under the National Historic Preservation Act. This memo is to be retained as an administrative record of this finding. AVOIDANCE AND MITIGATION PLAN:
Determination of Effect. Considering the information contained in the "Programmatic Agreement Among the Department of Defense, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, the Guam State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands State Historic Preservation Officer Regarding the Military Relocation to the Islands of Guam and Tinian" dated March 9, 2011, the Navy has determined that this project will have no effect on historic properties and does not require further review under the National Historic Preservation Act. This memo is to be retained as an administrative record of this finding. AVOIDANCE AND MITIGATION PLAN: No historic properties are present within APE for Project J-006. However, should an inadvertent discovery be made, as per Stipulation VI.F. of the PA, DoD will retain a full-time Archaeologist throughout the life of the construction program of this Undertaking to provide site checks, oversee coordination and execution of the archaeological mitigation measures in the PA and to provide quality control. This person shall support the CJRM in responding to and reporting of any inadvertent
Determination of Effect. If the DNR determines that historic property(ies) 341 within the APE may be directly, indirectly, or cumulatively affected by the 342 proposed Undertaking, the DNR will continue the review process as outlined 343 under Stipulation IV(C). 344 C. ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS FROM THE UNDERTAKING AND RESOLUTION OF ADVERSE 345 EFFECTS
Determination of Effect. A determination made by a federal agency in regards to a Project’s 37 effect upon a historic property as defined in 36 C.F.R. Part 800. 38
Determination of Effect. The NMDGF shall provide copies of the survey or inventory report(s), supporting documentation and eligibility and effect determinations to the appropriate state land managing agency, and to tribes and other consulting parties upon request, prior to submittal of the documentation to SHPO. These parties will have up to thirty days (30) to review and provide comment to NMDGF.
Determination of Effect. A determination of effect is made after avoidance and minimization through standard treatment measures and/or best management practices (BMPs) have been integrated into the project design (see Appendix C, II.D.2). The final project design must incorporate all agreed upon treatment measures and these will be included in the stipulations (e.g. Conditions of Approval) of the relevant authorization (e.g. Approved APD, ROW Grant etc.). Standard treatment measures and BMPs are avoidance and minimization measures, and are not mitigation measures for resolving adverse effects. A determination of effect shall consider reasonably foreseeable effects caused by the undertaking that may occur later in time, be farther removed in distance or be cumulative.
Determination of Effect
