Avoidance and Minimization. Lessee shall at all time engage in appropriate avoidance and minimization measures to prevent the unlawful take, possession or destruction of any protected species. This includes birds-of-prey, and the take, possession or destruction of the eggs and nests of any such bird.
Avoidance and Minimization. Lessee shall at all times engage in appropriate avoidance and minimization measures to prevent the unlawful take, possession, or destruction of any protected species.
Avoidance and Minimization. The CRNRA determined that it cannot fully determine that effects on historic properties prior to approval of the Trails Management Plan undertakings. The CRNRA will seek to avoid adverse effects to all types of historic properties, with input from the SHPO, Tribes, and Consulting Parties received during annual consultation meetings and comments during standard Section 106 consultation for all undertakings. Avoidance measures for historic properties may include (but are not limited to) rerouting trail alignments, fencing known sites for protection during construction, monitoring of construction near site areas within a buffer zone, or placing infrastructure outside of site boundaries.
Avoidance and Minimization. Lessee shall at all time engage in appropriate avoidance and minimization measures to prevent the unlawful take, possession or destruction of any protected species. This includes birds-of-prey, and the take, possession or destruction of the eggs and nests of any such bird. Natural Resource Coordinator. The County of Sacramento Department of Waste Management and Recycling (0000 Xxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000; Phone: (000) 000-0000, Fax: (000) 000-0000) will be contacted concerning any questions related to this paragraph. The Department of Waste Management and Recycling will be contacted before any tree is removed or pruned to ensure that appropriate nest tree avoidance and minimization measures are implemented.
Avoidance and Minimization. 1. The City, in consultation with Signatories and Invited Signatories, will take all appropriate steps proportionate to its jurisdiction to ensure that historic properties determined eligible for listing in the NRHP are avoided and preserved in place before the City conducts or authorizes activities under the Proposal that would diminish the integrity of such properties.
Avoidance and Minimization. The work locations associated with the project have been minimized to the extent feasible, while still allowing the work to proceed in a safe manner. To further minimize any potential impacts to covered plants, the work areas at Locations B, D, E, and the temporary staging area will be surrounded by fencing to delineate the work area boundary. This fencing will consist of rope and t-posts, orange construction fencing, or similar high visibility fencing. On the steep slopes downslope of the Location D work area, silt fencing may be installed to minimize the potential for sediments to roll downslope. Site Monitoring, Assessment, and Management Work activities at Location D will take place within a population of smooth lessingia and most-beautiful jewelflower. These populations are very extensive as shown on Figures 6 and 7, and connect with documented occurrences for smooth Lessingia and for most-beautiful jewelflower at the Xxxxxxxx Dam Spillway (CNDDB Occurrences 6 and 87, respectively). Impacts to these covered plant populations are expected to be less than 5% of the total occurrence as due to the limited number of plants within the work area relative to the larger occurrence and suitable habitat in the area. Per the HCP, impacts to less than 5% of the total occurrence for these plant species do not require monitoring, nor will it count as a permanent impact. Coyote ceanothus impacts are expected to be less than 5% of the total occurrence, but per the HCP, follow up monitoring by the Implementing Entity (Santa Xxxxx Valley Habitat Agency) is required. It is expected that this monitoring will occur for a 5-year period post-construction. ATTACHMENT 3 FEES AND CHARGES Fee type Impact type Fee rate Acres (or linear feet) Fee Multiplication Factor Total Land Cover Fees Zone A Permanent $18,004 per acre 1.8 $32,407.20 Temporary 2.5 $1,800.40 Zone B Permanent $12,482 per acre Temporary 0.3 0.04 $149.78 Special Fees (fees are in addition to land cover fees) Serpentine Permanent $58,586 per acre 1.6 $93,737.60 Temporary 2.6 0.04 $6,092.94 Total Mitigation Fees $134,187.93 PSE Charge ($5,000 or 10% of mitigation fees, whichever is greater) $13,418.79 Administrative Costs Reimbursement of actual costs ATTACHMENT 4 TABLE 6-2 CONDITION 3 COMPLIANCE TABLES Table 1. Conditions 3, 4, and 5 Avoidance and Minimization Measures – All Projects ID Avoidance and Minimization Measure (AMM) Project Type Applies to Proposed Project Documentation of compliance with AMMa Yes No Gen...
Avoidance and Minimization. PROCEDURES (AMPs) These Avoidance and Minimization Procedures (AMPs) are to assist the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (ADOT&PF) staff in their evaluation of practicable alternatives and design options for airport construction projects sponsored by the State of Alaska that avoid or minimize adverse impacts to Waters of the United States and wetlands. ADOT&PF staff must evaluate avoidance and minimization measures to meet the requirements of Executive Order (E.O.) 11990, the National Environmental Policy Act and Section 404(b)(1) of the Clean Water Act. The E.O. and Section 404(b)(1) require that impacts to wetlands be avoided or minimized if there is a practicable alternative. Thoroughly evaluating design and location alternatives and balancing the airport planning and engineering considerations, including cost, with environmental factors (e.g., functions and values) is what determines if there are “practicable alternatives”. In evaluating avoidance and minimization options, ADOT&PF staff will consult as appropriate with the agency or agencies with jurisdiction and special expertise (e.g., U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Marine Fisheries Service, Alaska Department of Fish & Game, Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Alaska State Historical Preservation Officer, Alaska Department of Governmental Coordination, or local coastal district). ADOT&PF staff will document the evaluation of avoidance and minimization options in a checklist (i.e. ADOT&PF AMP Checklist). The checklist is appended to the project specific environmental document (Categorical Exclusion or Environmental Assessment) and included in the project specific Corps of Engineers Section 404 permit application. The following shall be considered in evaluating measures to avoid and minimize impacts to Waters of the U.S. and wetlands:
