DETERMINATION OF NON-RESPONSIBILITY Sample Clauses

DETERMINATION OF NON-RESPONSIBILITY. As required by Article 5.2.11., GCPC, if a bidder who otherwise would have been awarded a contract is found to be “not responsible” by the Procurement Department, then the Chief Procurement Officer shall make a written determination of its findings and promptly send a copy of those findings to the non- responsible bidder. The written determination shall be part of the permanent contract file and is a public record available for inspection pursuant to §00-00-000, et seq., C.R.S., as amended.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
DETERMINATION OF NON-RESPONSIBILITY. As required by Article 5.3 Paragraph 11, GCPC, if an offeror who otherwise would have been awarded a contract is found to be “not responsible” by the Chief Procurement Officer, then the Chief Procurement Officer shall make a written determination of its findings and promptly send a copy of those findings to the non- responsible offeror. The written determination shall be part of the permanent contract file and is a public record available for inspection pursuant to §00-00-000, et seq., C.R.S., as amended. of work and price with the lowest responsible and responsive offeror if time or economic considerations preclude re-solicitation.
Sample 1
DETERMINATION OF NON-RESPONSIBILITY. As required by Article 5.2.11., GCPC, if a bidder who otherwise would have been awarded a contract is found to be “not responsible” by the Procurement Department, then the Chief Procurement Officer shall make a written determination of its findings and promptly send a copy of those findings to the non- P. AWARD. Pursuant to Article 5.2.12., GCPC, and subject to any other applicable provisions of the GCPC, all purchase orders or contracts shall be awarded with reasonable promptness by written notice to the lowest responsible and responsive bidder whose Bid best meets the requirements, factors, and criteria of this IFB. If all Bids timely submitted in response to this IFB exceed the amount of funds available to Garfield County, as certified by the Sr. Finance Administrator, then the Procurement Department may negotiate an adjustment in the original scope of work and price with the lowest responsible and responsive bidder if time or economic considerations preclude re-solicitation.
Sample 1
DETERMINATION OF NON-RESPONSIBILITY. If an offeror who otherwise would have been awarded a contract is found to be “not responsible” by the Chief Procurement Officer, then the Chief Procurement Officer shall make a written determination of its findings and promptly send a copy of those findings to the non-responsible offeror. The written determination shall be part of the permanent contract file and is a public record available for inspection pursuant to §00-00-000, et seq., C.R.S., as amended.
Sample 1

Related to DETERMINATION OF NON-RESPONSIBILITY

  • For Non-Responsibility The Bidder agrees that if it is found by the State that the Bidder’s responses to the Vendor Responsibility Questionnaire were intentionally false or intentionally incomplete, on such finding, the Commissioner may terminate the Contract.

  • Employer Responsibility The Employer accepts its responsibility to insure equal opportunity in all aspects of employment for all qualified persons regardless of race, creed, religion, color, national origin, age, disability, reliance on public assistance, sex, marital status, sexual orientation/affectional preference, or any other class or group distinction, as set forth by state or federal anti-discrimination laws, or in Board policy.

  • Union Responsibility The Union will attend to any necessary documentation required as a result of a change in the designated institution.

  • Allocation of Responsibility The City assumes no responsibility for the tax consequences of any VEBA contributions made by or on behalf of any member. Each union that elects to require VEBA contributions for the benefit of its members assumes sole responsibility for insuring that the VEBA complies with all applicable laws, including, without limitation, the Internal Revenue Code, and agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless for any taxes, penalties and any other costs and expenses resulting from such contributions.

  • Allocation of Responsibilities The persons responsible for the Plan and the duties and responsibilities allocated to each are as follows:

  • Employer Responsibilities Recognizing the inherent risk(s) in a correctional setting, the Employer is obligated to provide a safe workplace and to educate employees on proper safety procedures and use of protective and safety equipment. The Employer is committed to responding to legitimate safety concerns raised by the Union and employees. The Employer will comply with federal and state safety standards, including requirements relating to first aid training, first aid equipment and the use of protective devices and equipment.

  • Provider Responsibilities The Private Child-Caring Facility (PCC) (a.k.a., Provider) must comply with the following requirements:

  • Engineer Responsibilities No subcontract relieves the Engineer of any responsibilities under this contract.

  • Administrative Responsibilities Client shall be responsible for orienting Consultant to Client’s policies and procedures regarding the submission of any requisite paperwork which must be tendered for reimbursement by funding entities such as Medicare, Medicaid, or health insurance. Such paperwork may include, but is not limited to, patient care plans, comprehensive patient histories, individual education plans, or Client specific program plans. During the contracted assignment, should Consultant fail to submit paperwork as required per Client’s policies and procedures, Client must notify ProCare in writing within three (3) business days of alleged failure. Failure to notify ProCare before assignment ends shall negate any Client claim to withhold payment due to untimely work and/or paperwork non-compliance by Consultant. Client agrees that all approved time sheets by Client’s assigned representative are not subjected to billing dispute if Client fails to notify ProCare of time sheet and work performed discrepancies.

  • Construction Responsibilities The party named in Article 1, Responsible Parties, under AGREEMENT is responsible for the following: A. Advertise for construction bids, issue bid proposals, receive and tabulate the bids, and award and administer the contract for construction of the Project. Administration of the contract includes the responsibility for construction engineering and for issuance of any change orders, supplemental agreements, amendments, or additional work orders that may become necessary subsequent to the award of the construction contract. In order to ensure federal funding eligibility, projects must be authorized by the State prior to advertising for construction. B. If the State is the responsible party, the State will use its approved contract letting and award procedures to let and award the construction contract. C. If the Local Government is the responsible party, the Local Government shall submit its contract letting and award procedures to the State for review and approval prior to letting. D. If the Local Government is the responsible party, the State must concur with the low bidder selection before the Local Government can enter into a contract with the vendor. E. If the Local Government is the responsible party, the State must review and approve change orders. F. Upon completion of the Project, the party responsible for constructing the Project will issue and sign a “Notification of Completion” acknowledging the Project’s construction completion and submit certification(s) sealed by a professional engineer(s) licensed in the State of Texas. G. For federally funded contracts, the parties to this Agreement will comply with federal construction requirements cited in 23 CFR Part 635 and with requirements cited in 23 CFR Part 633, and shall include the latest version of Form “FHWA-1273” in the contract bidding documents. If force account work will be performed, a finding of cost effectiveness shall be made in compliance with 23 CFR 635, Subpart B.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!