Effect of non-approval of proposals (6) Notwithstanding that under subclause (1) any proposals of the Company are approved by the Minister or determined by arbitration award, unless each and every such proposal and matter is so approved or determined by 31 October 1992 or by such extended date or period if any as the Company shall be granted pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement then the Minister may give to the Company 12 months notice of intention to determine this Agreement and unless before the expiration of the said 12 months period all the detailed proposals and matters are so approved or determined this Agreement shall cease and determine subject however to the provisions of Clause 35. Implementation of proposals
PROCEDURE FOR APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT 28. Acceptance of this Settlement Agreement shall be sought at a hearing of the Central Regional Council of the MFDA on a date agreed to by counsel for Staff and the Respondent.
Application of other Rules and Special Commitments 1. Where a matter is governed simultaneously both by this Agreement and by another international agreement to which both Contracting Parties are parties, nothing in this Agreement shall prevent either Contracting Party or any of its investors who own investments in the territory of the other Contracting Party from taking advantage of whichever rules are more favourable to his case.
Conclusions and Recommendations For the reasons stated herein, Merrimack Energy concludes that the shortlisting decisions by PG&E in the 2007 RPS RFO were reasonable and based on the requirements and evaluation criteria set forth in the Solicitation Protocol. The selection of the shortlist was very inclusive and erred on the side of including more offers in what was a very ample shortlist relative to the procurement target. In the Shortlist Report, Merrimack Energy recommended a number of changes to the RPS procurement process, several of which were adopted by PG&E in the 2008 RPS RFO. Despite recommending certain changes, our assessment is that the PG&E evaluation methodology was appropriate and that it was administered fairly and reasonably. Consistent with suggestions we had made in and after the Shortlist Report, PG&E developed a negotiation prioritization strategy with shortlisted bidders that created an active group of negotiations based on price and viability factors. The Mojave Solar bid was consistently placed in the secondary group and although its proposal changed over time from the proposal initially shortlisted, it remained in the secondary group during the course of contract negotiations. While the project sponsor is a very viable and experienced developer of solar thermal projects and is capable of developing the project effectively, there are concerns associated with the timing of the project that adds risk to the ultimate success of the project. PG&E has done an effective job in managing these risks through contract provisions in both the original contract and the amended and restated agreement. The details of the PPA and the amended and restated agreement are addressed in the confidential appendix to this report. The positive attributes of the project should be balanced against the negative attributes in assessing whether or not the amended and restated agreement should be approved. PG&E Gas and Electric Advice Filing List General Order 96-B, Section IV AT&T Department of Water Resources North Coast SolarResources Xxxxxxxx & Xxxx LLP Dept of General Services Northern California Power Association Ameresco Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxxxx Occidental Energy Marketing, Inc. Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxx Xxxxxx & Brand OnGrid Solar Arizona Public Service Company Duke Energy Praxair BART Economic Sciences Corporation X. X. Xxxx & Associates Xxxxxxxxx & Xxx, Inc. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx LLP RCS, Inc. Xxxxxx Xxxxx Associates Xxxxxx Farms Recurrent Energy Bloomberg X. X. Xxxxxx & Assoc. SCD Energy Solutions Bloomberg New Energy Finance GLJ Publications SCE Boston Properties GenOn Energy, Inc. SMUD Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx XxXxxxxxxx, X.X. Xxxxxx, XxxXxxxx, Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx & Xxxxxxx XXXXX Brookfield Renewable Power Green Power Institute San Francisco Public Utilities Commission CA Bldg Industry Association Xxxxx & Xxxxxx Seattle City Light CLECA Law Office Hitachi Sempra Utilities CSC Energy Services In House Energy Sierra Pacific Power Company California Cotton Ginners & Growers Assn International Power Technology Silicon Valley Power California Energy Commission Intestate Gas Services, Inc. Silo Energy LLC California League of Food Processors Xxxxxxxx Berkeley National Lab Southern California Edison Company California Public Utilities Commission Los Angeles Dept of Water & Power Spark Energy, L.P. Calpine Xxxx, Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx & Scripps LLP Sun Light & Power Cardinal Cogen MAC Lighting Consulting Sunshine Design Xxxxxx, Xxxxx MBMC, Inc. Xxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx & Xxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxx MRW & Associates Tabors Caramanis & Associates City of Palo Alto Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Tecogen, Inc. City of Palo Alto Utilities XxXxxxxx & Associates Tiger Natural Gas, Inc. City of San Xxxx Xxxxxx Irrigation District TransCanada Clean Energy Fuels Modesto Irrigation District Turlock Irrigation District Coast Economic Consulting Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx United Cogen Commercial Energy Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxxxxx Utility Cost Management Consumer Federation of California NLine Energy, Inc. Utility Specialists Crossborder Energy NRG West Verizon Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx LLP Navigant Consulting Wellhead Electric Company Day Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx & Xxxx Associates Western Manufactured Housing Communities Association (WMA)
Non-Substantive Amendments The following items are considered by both parties to be not substantive and may be amended by resolution of Council.
Application Approval Our representative will notify you (or one of you, if there are co-applicants) of the Application approval, execute the Lease agreements for signature prior to occupancy, and, once complete, credit the application deposit of all applicants toward the required security deposit.
Effect of Non-Agreement on Guidelines Applications The parties understand, acknowledge and agree that there are no agreements between the parties with respect to any Sentencing Guidelines issues other than those specifically listed in Paragraph 10, and its subsections. As to any other Guidelines issues, the parties are free to advocate their respective positions at the sentencing hearing.
Substantive Amendments 6.2.1 Amendments to any matters not identified under Section 6.1 shall be deemed substantive and may only be amended in accordance with the approval requirements of the Halifax Regional Municipality Charter.
Final Decisions The Contracting Officer will issue a final decision as required by 33.211 if—
