Evaluation of Task Order Proposal Sample Clauses

Evaluation of Task Order Proposal. LADWP will review and evaluate the Task Order Proposal for completeness, clarity, Consultant's ability to perform the work and services, schedule, and proposed use of Subconsultants and Consultant personnel. Los Angeles Department of Water and Power-Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Agreement No. 47439F ' Professional, Technical, and Engineering Consulting Services During the review of the Consultant's Task Order Proposal, LADWP and the Consultant shall cooperatively work to develop a Task Order. To that end, informal exchanges between the Consultant and LADWP Task Order administrator or project manager are encouraged to aid in the development of the Task Order. Any particular Task Order may be performed either on a time-and-materials basis with a not-to-exceed amount established for each Task Order, or upon a lump-sum basis, or a combination thereof. The particular method of compensation for each Task Order shall be determined by the Parties during its development. LADWP and the Consultant shall select the method of compensation that is most compatible with the particular Task Order, provides the least cost to LADWP, and assures the Consultant adequate compensation consistent with this fee schedule in Exhibit C. LADWP and the Consultant agree to make a good faith effort to reach a mutually agreed upon fixed price or time and materials Task Order for services based upon the Consultant labor rates established in Exhibit C, Fee Schedule. Failure to agree on the price of such Task Orders shall be treated as a dispute and subject to the provisions of Article XI, Disputes, of this Agreement. Upon agreement over the final form of a Task Order, the Consultant shall transmit the Task Order, signed by the Consultant's Authorized Representative, to LADWP.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Evaluation of Task Order Proposal

  • Technical Proposal The technical proposal may be presented in free format. It shall not exceed ten pages, not counting the CVs. It shall respect the following page limit and structure: • Technical methodology (max. 7 pages) • Quality management (max. 1 page) • Project management (max. 1 page) • Resource management (proposal (max. 1 page) + CVs of experts)

  • Evaluation of Tenders 33.1 The Procuring Entity shall use the criteria and methodologies listed in this ITT and Section III, Evaluation and Qualification criteria. No other evaluation criteria or methodologies shall be permitted. By applying the criteria and methodologies, the Procuring Entity shall determine the Lowest Evaluated Tender. This is the Tender of the Tenderer that meets the qualification criteria and whose Tender has been determined to be:

  • EVALUATION OF BIDS i) Bids submitted by the tenderer will be opened first and evaluated for fulfilling the Pre-qualification criteria and other conditions in NIT/Tender documents, based on documentary evidence submitted along with the offer.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Evaluation of Teaching 1. All reports on a teacher shall be in writing.

  • Technical Advisory Committee (TAC The goal of this subtask is to create an advisory committee for this Agreement. The TAC should be composed of diverse professionals. The composition will vary depending on interest, availability, and need. TAC members will serve at the CAM’s discretion. The purpose of the TAC is to: • Provide guidance in project direction. The guidance may include scope and methodologies, timing, and coordination with other projects. The guidance may be based on: o Technical area expertise; o Knowledge of market applications; or o Linkages between the agreement work and other past, present, or future projects (both public and private sectors) that TAC members are aware of in a particular area. • Review products and provide recommendations for needed product adjustments, refinements, or enhancements. • Evaluate the tangible benefits of the project to the state of California, and provide recommendations as needed to enhance the benefits. • Provide recommendations regarding information dissemination, market pathways, or commercialization strategies relevant to the project products. The TAC may be composed of qualified professionals spanning the following types of disciplines: • Researchers knowledgeable about the project subject matter; • Members of trades that will apply the results of the project (e.g., designers, engineers, architects, contractors, and trade representatives); • Public interest market transformation implementers; • Product developers relevant to the project; • U.S. Department of Energy research managers, or experts from other federal or state agencies relevant to the project; • Public interest environmental groups; • Utility representatives; • Air district staff; and • Members of relevant technical society committees. The Recipient shall: • Prepare a List of Potential TAC Members that includes the names, companies, physical and electronic addresses, and phone numbers of potential members. The list will be discussed at the Kick-off meeting, and a schedule for recruiting members and holding the first TAC meeting will be developed. • Recruit TAC members. Ensure that each individual understands member obligations and the TAC meeting schedule developed in subtask 1.11. • Prepare a List of TAC Members once all TAC members have committed to serving on the TAC. • Submit Documentation of TAC Member Commitment (such as Letters of Acceptance) from each TAC member. Products: • List of Potential TAC Members • List of TAC Members • Documentation of TAC Member Commitment

  • Evaluation of Proposals 29.1 UNDP shall examine the Proposal to confirm that all terms and conditions under the UNDP General Terms and Conditions and Special Conditions have been accepted by the Proposer without any deviation or reservation.

  • Informal Resolution Outcomes a. When a complainant approaches an administrative officer and alleges harassment by another BCTF member, the following shall apply:

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.