Final score Sample Clauses
Final score. The scores for the award criteria will be added up. The procurement contract will be awarded to the tenderer with the highest final score, after the contracting authority has verified the accuracy of the Declaration on honour of this tenderer and provided the control shows that the Declaration on honour corresponds with reality.
Final score. “Potential for Harm”
Final score. The final weighted scores from the quality evaluation and the final weighted scores from the price evaluation should be added together for each Supplier and Suppliers should be ranked based on their final total score;
Final score. With respect to the purchase by the Issuer of Dealer Loans and related Seller Property on each Distribution Date during the Revolving Period, on each such Distribution Date, immediately after giving effect thereto, the weighted average of the Final Scores of all Contracts transferred on such Distribution Date is 680 or greater.
Final score. Final Score =
Final score. The final score of the candidate will be calculated by the sum of the score under the Educational and Professional Background and the Economic Proposal Final Score = (Technical Capabilities) + (Economic Proposal)
Final score. Harm or Potential Harm to Beneficial Uses
Final score. Harm or Potential Harm to Beneficial Uses The sums of the above factor scores are (3) for dibromochloromethane, (3) for dichlorobromomethane, (6) for total nitrogen, and (7) for total copper. These values are used in Step 2 as the “Potential for Harm” scores.
Final score. Further, the final testing score shall be the arithmetic average of the written test and the oral examination. Scores, ranking and information from written tests, oral boards, etc. will be accessible to the appointing officer to assist in his evaluation of candidates for promotion.
Final score. The Final Score (NF) will be obtained by means of the formula below, using two decimal places: Where: • NF = Final score • N1 = Score of Required Experience and Equipment • N2 = Score of Technical Proposal The technical documents of each proponent will be evaluated and will be assigned an “evaluation score”, ranging from 0 (zero) to 100 (one hundred) points. The proponent who obtains a zero score in any article (criterion), or even a score of less than 70 (seventy) points in the sum of the articles, will be ineligible.
3.1. Evaluation on the presentation of documents (N1) - TOP SCORE = 50 points. TOP SCORE 20 CRITERIA TEAM/PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE N1-B Coordinator or team leader 10 Specialist in development of computer systems and web platforms 08 Expert in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) 08 Participatory processes facilitator 04 TOP SCORE 30 TOTAL TOP SCORE N1 50 3.2. Evaluation of documents (N2) - TOP SCORE = 30 points.
i) Regular: when the content meets the minimum specified in the ToR; ii) Good: when the content of the proposal meets a quality higher than that required in the ToR; and iii) Excellent: when the proposal exceeded requirements in the Terms of Reference, presenting new ideas and concepts.