Final score. The scores for the award criteria will be added up. The procurement contract will be awarded to the tenderer with the highest final score, after the contracting authority has verified the accuracy of the Declaration on honour of this tenderer and provided the control shows that the Declaration on honour corresponds with reality.
Final score. “Potential for Harm”
Final score o The final weighted scores from the quality evaluation and the final weighted scores from the price evaluation should be added together for each Supplier and Suppliers should be ranked based on their final total score; o You may award the contract to the highest scoring/ranking Supplier, provided that they have passed any showstopper questions and they do not breach any quality thresholds you have stipulated within Attachment 2 – How to Bid;
Final score. With respect to the purchase by the Issuer of Dealer Loans and related Seller Property on each Distribution Date during the Revolving Period, on each such Distribution Date, immediately after giving effect thereto, the weighted average of the Final Scores of all Contracts transferred on such Distribution Date is 680 or greater.
Final score. Final Score =
Final score. The final score of the candidate will be calculated by the sum of the score under the Educational and Professional Background and the Economic Proposal Final Score = (Technical Capabilities) + (Economic Proposal)
Final score. Harm or Potential Harm to Beneficial Uses
Final score. Further, the final testing score shall be the arithmetic average of the written test and the oral examination. Scores, ranking and information from written tests, oral boards, etc. will be accessible to the appointing officer to assist in his evaluation of candidates for promotion.
Final score. The Final Score (NF) will be obtained by means of the formula below, using two decimal places: Where: • NF = Final score • N1 = Score of Required Experience and Equipment • N2 = Score of Technical Proposal The technical documents of each proponent will be evaluated and will be assigned an “evaluation score”, ranging from 0 (zero) to 100 (one hundred) points. The proponent who obtains a zero score in any article (criterion), or even a score of less than 70 (seventy) points in the sum of the articles, will be ineligible.
3.1. Evaluation on the presentation of documents (N1) - TOP SCORE = 50 points. TOP SCORE 20 CRITERIA TEAM/PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE N1-B Coordinator or team leader 10 Specialist in development of computer systems and web platforms 08 Expert in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) 08 Participatory processes facilitator 04 TOP SCORE 30 TOTAL TOP SCORE N1 50 3.2. Evaluation of documents (N2) - TOP SCORE = 30 points.
i) Regular: when the content meets the minimum specified in the ToR; ii) Good: when the content of the proposal meets a quality higher than that required in the ToR; and iii) Excellent: when the proposal exceeded requirements in the Terms of Reference, presenting new ideas and concepts.
Final score. The procurement contract will be awarded to the tenderer with the highest final score (Sf), summing up the two award criteria: 𝑆𝑓 = 𝐴𝑡 + 𝐵𝑡 Notice though that in accordance with Art. 85 of the Law of 17 June 2016, there is no obligation for the contracting authority to award the procurement contract. The contracting authority may either decide not to award the procurement contract; either redo the procedure, if necessary, through another award procedure. In an objective of transparency, Enabel undertakes to publish each year a list of recipients of its contracts. By introducing his tender, the successful tenderer declares that he agrees with the publication of the title of the contract, the nature and object of the contract, its name and location, and the amount of the contract.