Selection of Tenderers Sample Clauses

Selection of Tenderers. 1.3.7.1 Exclusion grounds and qualitative selection
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Selection of Tenderers. The LEP shall be responsible for compiling the list of Prospective Tenderers. The LEP shall be responsible for selecting the Tenderers from the list of Prospective Tenders on the basis of the following criteria: the financial standing of the Prospective Tenderers; and the technical, managerial and other relevant experience and ability of the Prospective Tenders (taking into account any relevant customer references). The Local Authority shall have a right to object to the selection of any person as a Prospective Tenderer if such person does not (or could not reasonably be considered) to comply with any of the criteria referred to in paragraph 6.2 above. To avoid doubt, an Excluded Person shall not be disqualified from selection as a Tenderer merely by virtue of the existence of the contractual relationship reflected in the Project Documents, Partnering Service Agreements or Supply Chain Agreements or in circumstances where its selection has been approved by the shareholders of the LEP pursuant to the terms of clause 6.2 of the Shareholders' Agreement, subject to: compliance with all Laws; and the establishment by the LEP of, and compliance with, arrangements satisfactory to the Local Authority (acting reasonably) to avoid any conflict of interest or unfair advantage. Failure by the LEP to comply with any such arrangements shall automatically lead to the disqualification of the Excluded Person and the provisions of paragraph 11 (Indemnities) shall apply. The Local Authority shall, in its absolute discretion, have the right to veto the selection of any person as a Tenderer on the grounds that the Prospective Tenderer has committed a Prohibited Act. The LEP shall (after consultation with the Local Authority) provide any Prospective Tenderer which is unsuccessful in being selected as a Tenderer with an appropriate explanation of the reasons behind its non-selection, if so requested by the person in question. Where, in respect of any Market Tested Service or group of Market Tested Services or any part of any Market Tested Service, there is only one Prospective Tenderer (or the LEP intends to select only one of the Prospective Tenderers as Tenderer), the LEP shall not be entitled to proceed with the Market Testing of the same without the prior written consent of the Local Authority, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed. The LEP shall be responsible for managing and co-ordinating the Market Testing in an efficient and fair manner in accordance w...
Sample 1Sample 2
Selection of Tenderers. Articles 66 – 80 of the Law; Articles 59 to 74 Royal Decree Award
Sample 1
Selection of Tenderers. 3.5.1 European Single Procurement Document (ESPD)
Sample 1
Selection of Tenderers a) Tenderers are ranked for selection for each lot in order of their overall scores for prices and quality from C item c) for the lot, highest score ranks first. i. EXCLUDING Site Staff: 1) The weighted average Fee percentage (%) by each Tender considered for the lot is calculated from the values entered by the Tenderer in table. 4.4.1 in volume 4 as follows. a) For each works value range band, the fee is calculated as the average of: The product of maximum works value for the band and the Tendered fee percentage for the band (e.g. £500,000 x 4% = £20,000), and The Tendered minimum fee for the band b) The resulting fees are multiplied by the weighting factor for each value band given in the table E below and the results summed to give an initial weighted fee. 0-100,000 0.380 >100,000 – 250,000 0.250 >250,000 – 500,000 0.140 >500,000 – 1,000,000 0.075 >1,000,000 – 1,500,000 0.047 >1,5000,000 – 2,250,000 0.035 >2,250,000 – 3,000,000 0.027 >3,000,000 – 4,000,000 0.023 >4,000,000 - 5,000,000 0.023 c) The mid range works values for each value band are also multiplied by the weighting factor for the value band given in the table 1 above and the results summed to give a weighted works value. d) An initial weighted fee percentage, is then derived as follows: 2) Uplift to weighted fee percentage to allow for refurbishment projects ii. Site Staff ONLY – LOT 4 ONLY: 1) The amount for site staff for each value band in table 4.4.2 is determined by evaluating the cost for the staff included in the Authority‟s minimum requirements in column (1) and the costs of any additional provisions entered by the Tenderer in the columns to the right of column (1) (see note below table 4.4.2) by calculating the total time each person is on site during the construction period for the value band and applying the staff rate for the person to this; the Core Services Staff rates in table 4.1.4i. (Project Management, Contract Administration and Site Supervision Services) shall be used for all persons. 2) A weighted amount for staff for each Tender considered is then calculated from the values entered by the Tenderer in table 4.4.2 in volume 4 as follows. a) For each works value band in table 4.4.2, the amount for site staff in table calculated in accordance with item 1) above is multiplied by the weighting factor for the value band given in the table 1 above. The results are then summed to give an initial weighted amount for site staff. 3) Uplift to aggregate weighted amount for site staff...
Sample 1
Selection of Tenderers 
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (53)

Related to Selection of Tenderers

  • Evaluation of Tenders 33.1 The Procuring Entity shall use the criteria and methodologies listed in this ITT and Section III, Evaluation and Qualification criteria. No other evaluation criteria or methodologies shall be permitted. By applying the criteria and methodologies, the Procuring Entity shall determine the Lowest Evaluated Tender. This is the Tender of the Tenderer that meets the qualification criteria and whose Tender has been determined to be: a) substantially responsive to the tender documents; and b) the lowest evaluated price. 33.2 Price evaluation will be done for Items or Lots (contracts), as specified in the TDS; and the Tender Price as quoted in accordance with ITT 14. To evaluate a Tender, the Procuring Entity shall consider the following: a) price adjustment due to unconditional discounts offered in accordance with ITT 13.4; b) converting the amount resulting from applying (a) and (b) above, if relevant, to a single currency in accordance with ITT 31; c) price adjustment due to quantifiable nonmaterial non-conformities in accordance with ITT 29.3; and d) any additional evaluation factors specified in the TDS and Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria. 33.3 The estimated effect of the price adjustment provisions of the Conditions of Contract, applied over the period of execution of the Contract, shall not be considered in Tender evaluation. 33.4 Where the tender involves multiple lots or contracts, the tenderer will be allowed to tender for one or more lots (contracts). Each lot or contract will be evaluated in accordance with ITT 33.

  • Clarification of Tenders 26.1 To assist in the examination, evaluation, comparison of the Tenders, and qualification of the Tenderers, the Procuring Entity may, at its discretion, ask any Tenderer for a clarification of its Tender. Any clarification submitted by a Tenderer in respect to its Tender and that is not in response to a request by the Procuring Entity shall not be considered. The Procuring Entity's request for clarification and the response shall be in writing. No change, including any voluntary increase or decrease, in the prices or substance of the Tender shall be sought, offered, or permitted except to confirm the correction of arithmetic errors discovered by the Procuring Entity in the Evaluation of the Tenders, in accordance with ITT 30. If a Tenderer does not provide clarifications of its Tender by the date and time set in the Procuring Entity's request for clarification, its Tender may be rejected.

  • Comparison of Tenders 34.1 The Procuring Entity shall compare the evaluated costs of all substantially responsive Tenders established in accordance with ITT 33.2 to determine the Tender that has the lowest evaluated cost. The comparison shall be on the basis of total cost (place of final destination) prices for all goods and all prices, plus cost of inland transportation and insurance to place of destination, for goods manufactured within the Kenya, together with prices for any required installation, training, commissioning and other services.

  • Selection Lessee acknowledges that it has selected the Equipment and disclaims any reliance upon statements made by the Lessor, other than as set forth in the Schedule.

  • Qualification of the Tenderer 5.1 All Tenderers shall provide in Section IV, Tendering Forms, a preliminary description of the proposed work method and schedule, including drawings and charts, as necessary. 5.2 In the event that pre-qualification of Tenderers has been undertaken as stated in ITT 18.3, the provisions on qualifications of the Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria shall not apply.