Final Summative Evaluation Conference. 1. No later than May 10, the evaluator and teacher shall meet to discuss the teacher’s final summative score. The final summative score, including the student growth score, must be determined by an analysis of evidence. This analysis will take a holistic assessment of the teacher’s performance over the course of the year. 2. The teacher has the right to provide additional evidence for each criterion to be scored. 3. All evidence, measures, and observations used in developing the final summative evaluation score must be a product of the school year in which the evaluation is conducted. 4. If the teacher believes the criterion score or final summative score did not consider certain teacher evidence, procedures outlined in this section were not followed, and/or the criteria were not objectively scored, they shall be granted any of the following (except for teachers being recommended for non-renewal, beyond May 15th): a. An additional formal observation by June 1st; and/or b. An alternative evaluator scoring of evidence. 5. The teacher will sign two (2) copies of the Final Summative Evaluation Report. Each teacher shall sign the observation and evaluation forms to indicate receipt. The signature of the teacher does not, however, necessarily imply that the employee agrees with its contents. The teacher may attach any written comments to observations and to the final annual evaluation report as well. 6. Teachers shall have the right to attach additional comments or a rebuttal to the Final Summative Evaluation.
Appears in 4 contracts
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement
Final Summative Evaluation Conference. 1. No later than May 10, June 1st the evaluator and teacher shall meet to discuss the teacher’s final summative score. The final summative score, including the student growth score, must be determined by an analysis of evidence. This analysis will take a holistic assessment of the teacher’s performance over the course of the year.
2. The teacher has the right to provide additional evidence for each criterion to be scored.
3. All evidence, measures, measures and observations used in developing the final summative evaluation score must be a product of the school year in which the evaluation is conducted.
4. If the evaluator judges the teacher to be below Proficient, the evaluator must provide at least three (3) pieces of evidence from at least two (2) artifacts.
5. If the teacher believes the criterion score or final summative score did not consider certain teacher evidence, procedures outlined in this section were not followed, evidence and/or the criteria were not objectively scored, they shall be granted any of the following (except for teachers being recommended for non-renewal, beyond May 15th):following:
a. 1. An additional formal observation by June 1st; and/or;
b. 2. An alternative evaluator scoring of evidenceevidence whom is mutually agreed upon by the teacher and the Association;
3. An additional observation by a different evaluator.
56. Nothing prohibits an evaluator from evaluating all teachers as Distinguished -4 within a school year.
7. The teacher will sign two (2) copies of the Final Summative Evaluation Report. Each teacher shall sign the observation and evaluation forms to indicate receipt. The signature of the teacher does not, however, necessarily imply that the employee agrees with its contents. The teacher may attach any written comments to observations and to the final annual evaluation report as well.
6. Teachers shall have the right to attach additional comments or a rebuttal to the Final Summative Evaluation.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement
Final Summative Evaluation Conference. 1. No later than May 10, 10th the evaluator and teacher shall meet to discuss the teacher’s final summative score. The final summative score, including the student growth score, must be determined by an analysis of evidence. This analysis will take a holistic assessment of the teacher’s performance over the course of the year.
2. The teacher has the right to provide additional evidence for each criterion to be scored.
3. All evidence, measures, and observations used in developing the final summative evaluation score must be a product of the school year in which the evaluation is conducted.
4. If the evaluator judges the teacher to be below Proficient, the evaluator must provide at least three (3) pieces of evidence from at least two (2) artifacts.
5. If the teacher believes the criterion score or final summative score did not consider certain teacher evidence, procedures outlined in this section were not followed, evidence and/or the criteria were not objectively scored, they shall be granted any of the following (except for teachers being recommended for non-renewal, beyond May 15th):following:
a. An additional formal observation by June 1st; and/or
b. An alternative evaluator scoring score of evidenceevidence whom is mutually agreed upon by the teacher and the Association;
c. Assignment of a new evaluator for the ensuing school year.
56. Nothing prohibits an evaluator from evaluating all teachers as Distinguished – 4 within a school year.
7. The teacher will sign two (2) copies of the Final Summative Evaluation Report. Each teacher shall sign the observation and evaluation forms to indicate receipt. The signature of the teacher does not, however, necessarily imply that the employee agrees with its contents. The teacher may attach any written comments to observations and to the final annual evaluation report as well.
6. Teachers shall have the right to attach additional comments or a rebuttal to the Final Summative Evaluation.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement
Final Summative Evaluation Conference. 1. No later than May 10, 15th the evaluator and teacher shall meet to discuss the teacher’s final summative score. The final summative score, including the student growth score, must be determined by an analysis of evidence. This analysis will take a holistic assessment of the teacher’s performance over the course of the year.
2. The teacher has the right to provide additional evidence for each criterion to be scored.
3. All evidence, measures, measures and observations used in developing the final summative evaluation score must be a product of the school year in which the evaluation is conducted.
4. If the evaluator judges the teacher to be below Proficient, the evaluator must provide at least three (3) pieces of evidence from at least two (2) artifacts.
5. If the teacher believes the criterion score or final summative score did not consider certain teacher evidence, procedures outlined in this section were not followed, evidence and/or the criteria were not objectively scored, they shall be granted any one of the following (except for teachers being recommended for non-renewal, beyond May 15th):following:
a. 1. An additional formal observation by June 1st; and/or;
b. 2. An alternative evaluator scoring of evidence;
3. Assignment of a new evaluator for the ensuing school year.
56. Nothing prohibits an evaluator from evaluating all teachers as Distinguished -4 within a school year.
7. The teacher will sign two (2) copies of the Final Summative Evaluation ReportReport (Appendix C- 7). Each teacher shall sign the observation and evaluation forms to indicate receipt. The signature of the teacher does not, however, necessarily imply that the employee agrees with its contents. The teacher may attach any written comments to observations and to the final annual evaluation report as well.
6. Teachers shall have the right to attach additional comments or a rebuttal to the Final Summative Evaluation.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement
