Final Validation Taskleader Sample Clauses

Final Validation Taskleader. UNIPD The selected suppliers will carry out the testing and validation activities for the three software prototypes developed in WP6. Testing and validation will be based on the use of the data sets provided by the memory institutions. Each memory institution will prepare testing data sets extracted from their own repositories. The data sets will include data and metada covering the different media types addressed by the three software prototypes, i.e. documents, images and audiovisual material. One demonstration will be organised by the suppliers at the end of the testing period to present the result of the work done. The location of the demonstration will be agreed with the suppliers. Person-Months per Participant Participant number 10 Participant short name 11 Person-months per participant 1 RA 2.00 6 UNIPD 2.00 7 BEELD EN GELUID 1.00 8 KIK-IRPA 2.00 9 GFC 2.00 10 LGMA 1.00 11 SPK 2.00 12 AJGI 2.00 00 Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Kultuuriministeerium 1.00 14 KUNGLIGA BIBLIOTEKET (NATIONAL LIBRARY O 2.00 Person-Months per Participant Participant number 10 Participant short name 11 Person-months per participant Total 17.00 List of deliverables Delive- rable Number 61 Deliverable Title Lead benefi- ciary number Estimated indicative person- months Nature 62 Dissemi- nation level 63 Delivery date 64 Total 0.00 Description of deliverables Schedule of relevant Milestones Milestone number 59 Milestone name Lead benefi- ciary number Delivery date from Annex I 60 Comments MS24 Testing completed 6 42 The testing phase is completed and final report on the implementation of the tender is delivered Project Number 1‌ 619568 Project Acronym 2 PREFORMA One form per Work Package Work package number 53 WP8 Type of activity 54 COORD Work package title Competitive Evaluation and Monitoring of the RTD work Start month 11 End month 42 Lead beneficiary number 55 6 Objectives WP8 has the following objectives: - to establish the competitive evaluation strategy to be used at the end of the Design phase 1 to chose the suppliers who continue the implementation of the tender - to support and monitor the execution of the tender, including its 3 phases (design, prototyping and testing) - to carry out the final assessment of the results of the tender Description of work and role of partners This WP8 is composed by 4 tasks: Task 8.1 Evaluation strategy Task Leader: UNIPD This task will define the evaluation strategy for comparing the results of the suppliers, at the end of the design phase. The eval...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Final Validation Taskleader

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK Firms and/or individuals that assisted in the development or drafting of the specifications, requirements, statements of work, or solicitation documents contained herein are excluded from competing for this solicitation. This shall not be applicable to firms and/or individuals providing responses to a publicly posted Request for Information (RFI) associated with a solicitation.

  • Office of Supplier Diversity The State of Florida supports its diverse business community by creating opportunities for woman-, veteran-, and minority-owned small business enterprises to participate in procurements and contracts. The Department encourages supplier diversity through certification of woman-, veteran-, and minority-owned small business enterprises and provides advocacy, outreach, and networking through regional business events. For additional information, please contact the Office of Supplier Diversity (OSD) at xxxxxxx@xxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Validation Review In the event OIG has reason to believe that: (a) Good Shepherd’s Claims Review fails to conform to the requirements of this CIA; or (b) the IRO’s findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate, OIG may, at its sole discretion, conduct its own review to determine whether the Claims Review complied with the requirements of the CIA and/or the findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate (Validation Review). Good Shepherd shall pay for the reasonable cost of any such review performed by OIG or any of its designated agents. Any Validation Review of Reports submitted as part of Good Shepherd’s final Annual Report shall be initiated no later than one year after Good Shepherd’s final submission (as described in Section II) is received by OIG. Prior to initiating a Validation Review, OIG shall notify Good Shepherd of its intent to do so and provide a written explanation of why OIG believes such a review is necessary. To resolve any concerns raised by OIG, Good Shepherd may request a meeting with OIG to: (a) discuss the results of any Claims Review submissions or findings; (b) present any additional information to clarify the results of the Claims Review or to correct the inaccuracy of the Claims Review; and/or (c) propose alternatives to the proposed Validation Review. Good Shepherd agrees to provide any additional information as may be requested by OIG under this Section III.D.3 in an expedited manner. OIG will attempt in good faith to resolve any Claims Review issues with Good Shepherd prior to conducting a Validation Review. However, the final determination as to whether or not to proceed with a Validation Review shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.

  • Terms of Reference of the Investigator (a) The purpose of the investigator will be to ascertain facts.

  • Academic Policies and Student Support Services X. Xxxx College courses offered as dual credit, regardless of where they are taught, follow the same syllabus, course outline, textbook, grading method, and other academic policies and procedures as the courses outlined in the Hill College policy manual, catalog, and student handbook. [TAC 19, Part 1, Chapter 4, Subchapter D, 4.85(g)(1)]

  • Commencement, Prosecution, and Completion of Work The Contractor will be required (a) to commence the Work under this Contract on the applicable Proceed Order Date, (b) to prosecute the Work with faithfulness and energy (c) to install the various parts of the work with equal steps shown on the Overall Project Schedule and at the same rate (or better) shown on the Overall Project Schedule and (d) to complete the Work within the Contract Time, as adjusted. Commencement of the Work shall mean actual physical work on the Site. Unless otherwise agreed, and subject to Change Orders, Material Completion of the Project must be achieved on or before the date established as the Material Completion and Occupancy Date under the Schedule.

  • Inspection and Testing Each Constructing Entity shall cause inspection and testing of the Interconnection Facilities that it constructs in accordance with the provisions of this section. The Construction Parties acknowledge and agree that inspection and testing of facilities may be undertaken as facilities are completed and need not await completion of all of the facilities that a Constructing Entity is building.

  • C-TPAT In connection with providing Goods and Services to AGILENT, Seller shall comply with Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C- TPAT) or equivalent supply chain security measures. When requested by AGILENT, Seller shall demonstrate compliance by providing certification thereof to AGILENT.

  • Maintenance and Testing 54.5.1. Sprint is only responsible for maintaining the facilities that it owns.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.