Task leader. An NRC task leader will be chosen to lead a Rulemaking working group. Responsibilities for task leaders are listed in Section III.F of this directive.
Task leader. The persons responsible for the daily technical management of the work associated to a particular task. The task leader report to the respective WP leader and they should make sure that the proper deliverables are ready to be reviewed in time for the corresponding milestone. Each WP leader will nominate the Task leaders in respective workpackages.
Task leader. GeoZS Geo-ZS: Facilitator at capacity building activities, support with editing, designing/ preparing page – break for materials / book MIRO: Contribute to capacity building activities, organisation of events, editing all kinds of publica- tions, editing the envisaged book BGS: Contribute to organisation and content of capacity building activities, contributing to presen- tations, editing of publications (in English) BRGM, DLR, WI, CGS, UVSQ: Contribute to content of presentations and other material, work- shops, seminars and/or capacity building events
Task leader. BGS BGS: Preparation of content and design of non-technical leaflet series ready for printing with con- tribution from all partners as appropriate, design and compilation of text and images for the website with technical material supplied by the relevant partners. conceptual design of multimedia material. MIRO: Contribute to establishment of communication strategy, provide communication channel to ETP SMR, contribute to creation of promotion material, hosting project web site Geo-ZS: Contribute to preparation of communication strategy, provide and maintain communica- tion channel to RMSG BRGM, DLR, WI, CGS, UVSQ, CzechGS, SU, AACL: Contribute to content of technical promotion material and non-technical leaflet series as well as multimedia material Task 5.3: Initiating and establishing a sound “trialogue” Exploration as well as exploitation activities related to winning of mineral resources will always cause some impact to the environment and the society in the affected region. The project will make available reliable and objective information about affected ecosystems, populations and societies, to serve as a basis for a sound “trialogue” between industrialists, governmental organisations and stakeholders. Using the communication strategy established in Task 5.2, Task 5.3 will initiate and develop this “trialogue”, which is meant to contribute to reconciliation of interests in order to reach common agreement upon actions to deal with environmental and social impacts of mining activi- ties. Apart from this the “trialogue” would in a way also confirm the project idea and outcomes and confirm its usefulness. In the context of structuring the “trialogue” a Deliberation Matrix, a multimedia evaluation tool de- veloped by C3ED, may be applied. This tool confronts the diversity of stakeholders views on the different issues (eg. biodiversity preservation), using indicators. This should represent an opportu- nity to build a common representation and language of the exploitation and to structure the dia- xxxxx between the different actors. Similar to the capacity building events (see Task 5.1) “trialogue” events will be organised on local level in connection with the annual project meetings (at test sites) and the final meeting. Addition- ally, one event will take place in Brussels in the second half of the project involving lobbying or- ganisations like Euromines or IMA and other EU stakeholders together with members of the RMSG. Correspondingly, the “trialogue” is...
Task leader. UoW This task addresses objectives 1 and 2 by disseminating the latest results and technologies of desktop grid computing towards scientific user communities, and by organising training courses to facilitate the broader take-up of these technologies. Application domain specific success stories will be written and published. Participation and presentations on specific user community related events (workshops, conferences, industry events, etc.) will be organised. Scientific organisations will be supported in setting up local desktop grid infrastructures (with concrete technical support provided by WP2). Training courses for different audiences (end-users, application developers and system administrators), and existing or potential user communities will be held. Emphasis will also be put on training future trainers and provide them with IDGF training certification to facilitate the sustainability of these events. Training material will be made available and updated on-line. Task 4.2 – Analysis of potential applications to be ported to desktop grid platforms Task leader: UoW This task also contributes to the implementation of objective 1 by analysing the feasibility of applications of potential new user communities on IDGF supported platforms. The task will utilise the IDGF Application Description template to collect information about the applications, and together with the user community it will analyse the feasibility of the porting and identify user requirements.
Task leader. RA Maintaining a coherent view of the project work and results Facilitate a project intranet for collecting work material and results Facilitate communication between partners, through face-to-face and electronic meetings Initiate overall project start-up activities Follow-up on proper start and execution of work packages and tasks Risk Management
Task leader. HS This task follows the Design phase 2 and aims to deliver and demonstrate the improved final version of the prototypes, that will be ready to enter the testing and validation phase (WP7) The software developed by the suppliers will be delivered in the Open Source Portal. Reports about the progresses of the suppliers work are provided in the CSA part.
Task leader. Generating a scalable abstract model in Matlab of the EMI generated from the power supply variations in a GALS system. Develop the optimal algorithms for reducing the EMI. Evaluate the proposed EMI reduction algorithms theoretically and in practice. Fabrication of simple test chip in IHP 0.13 um CMOS process for evaluation of the developed techniques and algorithms (common deliverable for 7.2 and 7.3); Characterizing EMI of the fabricated test chip; Evaluation of measurement results and comparison with theoretical estimations. Duration: 14 person-months • Low-power GALS design (7.2): GALS design has always been known for its low-power potential. Up to now, this potential has been largely unfulfilled, and research in this area has been more on high-level analyses of processor architectures. In this task we plan to combine state-of-the-art low-power methods like dynamic voltage scaling (DVS), and subthreshold logic design with GALS techniques.
Task leader. LSE; Partners involved: All A systematic review protocol will be developed consisted with standard review protocol guidance to help identify research on health care financing models and tools used to influence the mix and utilisation of services so as to promote better quality and outcomes for health care service users in general and mental health services in particular. The protocol with cover a range of bibliographic databases; key web based resources will be included in the search along with a hand search of key journals. Pilot searches in different databases will be run to help refine search.
Task leader. SINTEF; Partners involved: all Prepare data from service mapping (WP 6), pathways of care (WP 7) and quality indicators and need for care (WP 8) to be used for analysis purposes within the framework analytical tool. Use data from work packages 4-8 on the national level and below the national level to examine associations between financing system characteristic and financing mechanisms on one side and different aspects of quality on the other side. We will perform analysis within a multi level statistical approach to the extent that data permit. For those catchment areas where data will be available at individual or service level (micro level), the influence of incentives on pathways of care and on quality of care will be assessed using a quasi-experimental approach.
