Findings and Conclusions Concerning Notice. The Court finds that the form, content, and method of giving notice to the Settlement Class as described in Paragraph 7 of this Order and the Settlement Agreement (including the exhibits thereto): (a) will constitute the best practicable notice to the Settlement Class; (b) are reasonably calculated to apprise Settlement Class Members of the pendency of the action, the terms of the proposed Settlement, and their rights under the proposed Settlement, including but not limited to their rights to object or exclude themselves from the proposed Settlement and other rights under the terms of the Settlement Agreement; (c) are reasonable and constitute due, adequate, and sufficient notice to all Class Members and other persons entitled to receive notice; and the Court concludes that the Notice FILED DATE: 7/11/2022 8:54 PM 2021CH06274 Program meets all applicable requirements of law, and (e), and the Due Process Clause(s) of the United States Constitution. The Court further finds that the Notice is written in plain language, uses simple terminology, and is designed to be readily understandable by Class Members.
Findings and Conclusions Concerning Notice. The Court finds that the form, content, and method of giving notice to the Settlement Class as described in Section 7 of this Order and the Settlement Agreement (including the exhibits thereto): (a) will constitute the best practicable notice to the Settlement Class; (b) are reasonably calculated to apprise the Settlement Class Members of the pendency of the action, the terms of the proposed Settlement, including but not limited to their rights to object to or exclude themselves from the proposed Settlement and other rights under the terms of the Settlement Agreement; (c) are reasonable and constitute due, adequate, and sufficient notice to all Class Members and other persons entitled to receive notice; and the Court concludes that the Notice program meets all applicable requirements of law, including Rule 23 (c) and (e) and the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution. The Court further finds that the Notice is written in plain language, uses simple terminology, and is designed to be readily understandable by Class Members.
Findings and Conclusions Concerning Notice. The Court finds that the form, content, and method of giving notice to the Settlement Class as described in Article VII of the Settlement Agreement (including the exhibits thereto): (a) was the best practicable notice to the Settlement Class; (b) was reasonably calculated to apprise Settlement Class Members of the pendency of the action, the terms of the proposed Settlement, and their rights under the proposed Settlement, including but not limited to their rights to object to or exclude themselves from the proposed Settlement and other rights under the terms of the Settlement Agreement; (c) was reasonable and constitute due, adequate, and sufficient notice to all Class Members and other persons entitled to receive notice; and (d) met all applicable requirements of law, including Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(c) and (e), and met the Due Process Clause(s) of the United States Constitution. The Court further finds that the Notice was written in plain language, used simple terminology, and was designed to be readily understandable by Class Members. The Court finds that Defendant has fully complied with the notice requirements of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005, 28 U.S.C. § 1715.
Findings and Conclusions Concerning Notice. The Court finds that the form, content, and method of giving notice to the Settlement Class as described in this Preliminary Approval Order and the Settlement Agreement (including the exhibits thereto) constitutes reasonable notice of the commencement of the action to the Settlement Class. Specifically, the Notices (both Short Form and Long Form in Exhibits B and C) themselves are clear and straightforward. They define the Settlement Class; clearly describe the options available to class members and the deadlines for taking action; describe the essential terms of the Settlement, including a description of the subject matter and the proposed terms of the Settlement, including a summary of the monetary or other benefits the class would receive; disclose the requested Service Award for the Class Representative, as well as the amount that Settlement Class Counsel intends to seek in fees, costs, and expenses; describe procedures for making claims, objections, and requesting exclusion; provide information that will enable Settlement Class Members to calculate their individual recovery; describe the date, time, and place of the Final Fairness Hearing; and prominently display the address and phone number of Settlement Class Counsel and the Settlement Administrator for Settlement Class Members to make further inquiry about the Settlement. Finally, direct mailing, combined with publishing on the Settlement Website, is designed to be the best reasonable notice of the commencement of the action to reach the Settlement Class Members under the circumstances. The Court concludes that the Notice Program meets all applicable requirements of law and constitutes Due Process under the U.S. and Wisconsin Constitutions.
Findings and Conclusions Concerning Notice. The Court finds that the form, Electronically Filed - Xxxxxxx - Kansas City - December 30, 2020 - 01:40 PM content, and method of giving notice to the Settlement Class as described in Paragraph 8 of this Order and the Settlement Agreement (including the exhibits thereto): (a) will constitute the best practicable notice to the Settlement Class; (b) are reasonably calculated to apprise Settlement Class Members of the pendency of the action, the terms of the proposed Settlement, and their rights under the proposed Settlement, including but not limited to their rights to object to or exclude themselves from the proposed Settlement and other rights under the terms of the Settlement Agreement; (c) are reasonable and constitute due, adequate, and sufficient notice to all Class Members and other persons entitled to receive notice; and the Court concludes that the Notice Program meets all applicable requirements of law, including Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 52.08, and the Due Process Clause(s) of the Missouri and United States Constitutions. The Court further finds that the Notice is written in plain language, uses simple terminology, and is designed to be readily understandable by Class Members.
Findings and Conclusions Concerning Notice. The Court finds that the form, content, and method of giving notice to the Settlement Class as described in the Settlement Agreement (including without limitation Section 4.2, and the exhibits to the Settlement Agreement): (a) will constitute the best practicable notice to the Settlement Class; (b) are reasonably calculated to apprise Settlement Class Members of the pendency of the action, the terms of the proposed Settlement, and their rights under the proposed Settlement, including but not limited to their rights to object to or exclude themselves from the proposed Settlement and other rights under the terms of the Settlement Agreement; (c) are reasonable and constitute due, adequate, and sufficient notice to all Class Members and other persons entitled to receive notice; and the Court concludes that the notice program meets all applicable requirements of law, including Tex. R. Civ. P. 42(c)(2), and the Due Process Clause of the Texas and United States Constitutions. The Court further finds that the Notice is written in plain language, uses simple terminology, and is designed to be readily understandable by Class Members.
Findings and Conclusions Concerning Notice. The Court finds that the form, content, and method of giving notice to the Settlement Class as described in Paragraph 8 of this Order and the Settlement Agreement (including the exhibits thereto): (a) will constitute the best practicable notice to the Settlement Class; (b) are reasonably calculated to apprise Settlement Class Members of the pendency of the action, the terms of the proposed Settlement, and their rights under the proposed Settlement, including but not limited to their rights to object to or exclude themselves from the proposed Settlement and other rights under the terms of the Settlement Agreement; (c) are reasonable and constitute due, adequate, and sufficient notice to all Class Members and other persons entitled to receive notice; and the Court concludes that the Notice Program meets all applicable requirements of law, including MCR 3.501(C), and the Due Process Clause(s) of the United States Constitution and Michigan State Constitution. The Court further finds that the Notice is written in plain language, uses simple terminology, and is designed to be readily understandable by Class Members.
Findings and Conclusions Concerning Notice. The Court finds that the form, content, and method of giving notice to the Settlement Class as described in Paragraph 7 of this Order and the Settlement Agreement (including the exhibits thereto): (a) will constitute the best practicable notice to the Settlement Class; (b) are reasonably calculated to apprise Settlement Class Members of the pendency of the action, the terms of the proposed Settlement, and their rights under the proposed Settlement, including but not limited to their rights to object to or exclude
Findings and Conclusions Concerning Notice. The Court finds that the form, content, and method of giving notice to the Settlement Class as described in Paragraph 8 of this Preliminary Approval Order and the Settlement Agreement (including the exhibits thereto) constitutes reasonable notice of the commencement of the action to the Settlement Class pursuant to Tex. R. Civ. P. 42. Specifically, the Notices (both Short Form and Long Form in Exhibits A and B, respectively) themselves are clear and straightforward. They define the Settlement Class; clearly describe the options available to class members and the deadlines for taking action; describe the essential terms of the Settlement, including a description of the subject matter and the proposed terms of the Settlement, including a summary of the monetary or other benefits the class would receive; disclose the requested Service Award for the Class Representative, as well as the amount that Settlement Class Counsel intends to seek in fees, costs, and expenses; describe procedures for making claims, objections, and requesting exclusion; provide information that will enable Settlement Class Members to calculate their individual recovery; describe the date, time, and place of the Final Fairness Hearing; and prominently display the address and phone number of Settlement Class Counsel and the Settlement Administrator for Settlement Class Members to make further inquiry about the Settlement. Finally, direct mailing, combined with publishing on the Settlement Website, is designed to be the best reasonable notice of the commencement of the action to reach the Settlement Class Members under the circumstances. The Court concludes that the Notice Program meets all applicable requirements of law pursuant to Tex. R. Civ. P. 42 and constitutes Due Process under the U.S. and Texas Constitutions.
Findings and Conclusions Concerning Notice. The Court finds that the form, 2 content, and method of giving notice to the Settlement Class as described in Paragraph 8 of this 3 Order and the Settlement Agreement (including the exhibits thereto): (a) will constitute the best 4 practicable notice to the Settlement Class; (b) are reasonably calculated to apprise Settlement Class 5 Members of the pendency of the action, the terms of the proposed Settlement, and their rights 6 under the proposed Settlement, including but not limited to their rights to object to or exclude 7 themselves from the proposed Settlement and other rights under the terms of the Settlement 8 Agreement; (c) are reasonable and constitute due, adequate, and sufficient notice to all Class 9 Members and other persons entitled to receive notice; and the Court concludes that the Notice 10 Program meets all applicable requirements of law, including Washington Civil Rule 23(c) and (e), 11 and the Due Process Clause(s) of the United States Constitution and Washington State
