Highway Projects. 3.3.1 Except as provided in subpart 3.3.2 of this MOU or otherwise specified in this subpart, the assignments and assumptions of the USDOT Secretary's responsibilities under subparts
3.1 and 3.2 of this MOU shall apply to the environmental review, consultation, or any other action pertaining to the environmental review or approval of the following classes of highway projects located within the State of Arizona. The definition of "highway project" is found at 23 C.F.R. 773.103, and for purposes of this MOU, "highway project" includes eligible preventative maintenance activities. ADOT shall conduct any reevaluation required by 23 C.F.R. 771.129 for projects for which construction is not completed prior to the date of this MOU in accordance with the provisions of this MOU. Prior to approving any CE determination, FONSl, final EIS, or final EIS/ROD, ADOT shall ensure and document that for any proposed project the design concept, scope, and funding are consistent with the current Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), or Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), as applicable.
A. All Class I, or EIS projects, that are funded by FHWA or require FHWA approvals.
B. All Class II, or CE projects, that are funded by FHWA or require FHWA approvals, and that do not qualify for assignment of responsibilities pursuant to ADOT’s Section 326 MOU.
C. All Class III, or EA projects, that are funded by FHWA or require FHWA approvals.
D. Projects funded by other Federal agencies (or projects without any Federal funding) that also require FHWA approvals. For these projects, ADOT would not assume the NEPA responsibilities of other Federal agencies; however, ADOT may use or adopt another Federal agency’s NEPA analysis or documents consistent with 40 C.F.R. parts 1500-1508, current law, and USDOT and FHWA regulations, policies, and guidance.
E. FHWA will retain responsibility for the South Mountain Freeway EIS until the notices of limitation of claims issued by FHWA pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 139(l) have expired. ADOT agrees to be responsible for any re-evaluations needed under 23 C.F.R. 771.129 or other environmental reviews needed for the South Mountain Freeway project thereafter.
3.3.2 The following are specifically excluded from the list in subpart 3.3.1 of highway projects:
A. Any Federal Lands Highway projects authorized under 23 U.S.C. 202, 203, 204, and FAST Act Section 1123, unless such projects will be designed and constructed by ADOT.
B. A...
Highway Projects. 3.3.1 Except as provided by subpart 3.3.2 below or otherwise specified in this subpart, the assignments and assumptions of the USDOT Secretary’s responsibilities under subparts 3.1 and 3.2 above shall apply with respect to the environmental review, consultation, or other action pertaining to the review or approval of the following classes of highway projects located within the State of California. The definition of “highway project” is found at 23 CFR 773.103, and for purposes of this MOU, “highway project” includes eligible preventative maintenance activities. Prior to approving any CE determination under this MOU, FONSI, final EIS, or final EIS/ROD, the State of California shall ensure and document that for any proposed project the design concept, scope, and funding are consistent with the current Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP), Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), or Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP).
A. Projects requiring an EIS, both on the state highway system (SHS) and Local Assistance projects off the SHS that are funded by the FHWA or require FHWA approvals.
B. Projects qualifying for CEs, both on the SHS and Local Assistance projects off the SHS that are funded by the FHWA or require FHWA approvals, and that do not qualify for assignment of responsibilities pursuant to the 326 CE MOU.
C. Projects requiring EAs, both on the SHS and Local Assistance projects off the SHS that are funded by the FHWA or require FHWA approvals:
D. Projects funded by other Federal agencies [or projects without any Federal funding] that also require FHWA approvals and meet the definition of a highway project found at 23 CFR 773.103. For these projects, Xxxxxxxx would not assume the NEPA responsibilities of other Federal agencies. However, Caltrans may use or adopt other Federal agencies’ NEPA analyses consistent with 40 CFR parts 1500–1508, and USDOT and FHWA regulations, policies, and guidance.
3.3.2 The following are specifically excluded from the list in subpart 3.3.1 of highway projects and classes of highway projects:
A. Any highway projects authorized under 23 U.S.C. 202, 203, and 204 unless such projects will be designed and constructed by Caltrans;
B. Any project that crosses State boundaries and any project that crosses or is adjacent to international boundaries. For purposes of this agreement a project is considered “adjacent to international boundaries” if it requires the issuance of a new or the modification of an existing Presidential Permit by th...
Highway Projects. 3.3.1 Except as provided by subpart 3.3.2 below or otherwise specified in this subpart, the assignments and assumptions of the USDOT Secretary's and FHWA’s responsibilities under subparts 3.1 and
Highway Projects. 3.3.1 Except as provided by subpart 3.3.2 below or otherwise specified in this subpart, the assignments and assumptions of the USDOT Secretary's responsibilities under subparts 3.1 and 3.2 above shall apply to the environmental review, consultation, or other action pertaining to the environmental review or approval of the following classes of highway projects located within the State of Texas. The definition of “highway project” is found at 23 CFR 773.103, and for purposes of this MOU, “highway project” includes eligible preventative maintenance activities. The State shall conduct any reevaluations required under 23 CFR 771.129 for projects for which construction is not completed prior to the date of this MOU, in accordance with the provisions of this MOU. Prior to approving any CE determination, FONSI, final EIS, or final EIS/ROD, the State shall ensure and document that for any proposed project the design concept, scope, and funding are consistent with the current Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP), Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), or Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP).
A. Projects requiring an EIS, both on the state highway system (SHS) and local government projects off the SHS that are funded by FHWA or require FHWA approvals. This assignment does not include the environmental review associated with the development and approval of the Draft EIS, Final EIS, and ROD for the following projects:
1. Trinity Parkway – This project is in the Dallas District with limits from IH 35E/SH 183 to US 175/SH 310. The project would include new location construction of a four (4) to six (6) lane tollway with a nine-mile encroachment into a USACE- regulated floodway of the Trinity River.
Highway Projects. 3.3.1 Except as provided in subpart 3.3.2 of this MOU or otherwise specified in this subpart, the assignments and assumptions of the USDOT Secretary's responsibilities under subparts 3.1 and 3.2 of this MOU shall apply to the environmental review, consultation, or any other action pertaining to the environmental review or approval of the following classes of highway projects located within the State of Alaska. The definition of "highway project" is found at 23 C.F.R. part 773.103, and for purposes of this MOU, "highway project" includes eligible preventative maintenance activities. The DOT&PF shall conduct any reevaluation required by 23 C.F.R. part 771.129 for projects for which construction is not completed prior to the date of the Original MOU, in accordance with the provisions of this MOU and the Original MOU. Prior to approving any CE determination, FONSI, final EIS, or final EIS/ROD, DOT&PF shall ensure and document that for any proposed project the design concept, scope, and funding are consistent with the current Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP), Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), or Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), as applicable.
A. All Class I, or EIS projects that are funded by FHWA or require FHWA approvals.
B. All Class II, or CE projects, that are funded by FHWA or require FHWA approvals.
C. All Class III, or EA projects, that are funded by FHWA or require FHWA approvals.
D. The DOT&PF will not assume the NEPA responsibilities of other Federal agencies. However, DOT&PF may use or adopt another Federal agency's NEPA analysis or documents consistent with 40 C.F.R. parts 1500-1508, current law, and USDOT and FHWA regulations, policies, and guidance.
3.3.2 The following are specifically excluded from the list in subpart 3.3.1 of highway projects:
A. Any Federal Lands Highway projects authorized under 23 U.S.C. 202, 203, 204, and Section 1123 of the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (P.L. 114-94), unless such projects will be designed and constructed by DOT&PF.
B. Any project that crosses or is adjacent to international boundaries. For purposes of this MOU, a project is considered "adjacent to international boundaries" if it requires the issuance of a new, or the modification of an existing, Presidential Permit by the U.S. Department of State.
C. Projects under the Recreational Trails Program (23 U.S.C. 206).
D. Denali Commission projects (fully administered by the Denali Commission, with no FHWA involvement after transfer o...
Highway Projects. 3.3.1 Except as provided in subpart 3.3.2 of this MOU or otherwise specified in this subpart, the assignments and assumptions of the USDOT Secretary's responsibilities under subparts 3.1 and 3.2 of this MOU shall apply to the environmental review, consultation, or any other action pertaining to the environmental review or approval of the following classes of highway projects located within the State of Alaska. The definition of "highway project" is found at 23 C.F.R. part 773.103, and for purposes of this MOU, "highway project" includes eligible preventative maintenance activities. The DOT&PF shall conduct any reevaluation required by 23 C.F.R. part 771.129 for projects for which construction is not completed prior to the date of the Original MOU, in accordance with the provisions of this MOU and the Original MOU. Prior to approving any CE determination, FONSI, final EIS, or final EIS/ROD, DOT&PF shall ensure and document that for any proposed project the design concept, scope, and funding are consistent with the current Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP), Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), or Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), as applicable.
A. All Class I, or EIS projects that are funded by FHWA or require FHWA approvals.
B. All Class II, or CE projects, that are funded by FHWA or require FHWA approvals. C. All Class III, or EA projects, that are funded by FHWA or require FHWA approvals.
Highway Projects. 3.3.1 Except as provided in subpart 3.3.2 of this MOU or otherwise specified in this subpart, the assignments and assumptions of the USDOT Secretary's responsibilities under subparts 3.1 and 3.2 of this MOU shall apply to the environmental review, consultation, or any other action pertaining to the environmental review or approval of the following classes of highway projects located within the State of Arizona. The definition of "highway project" is found at 23 CFR 773.103, and for purposes of this MOU, "highway project" includes eligible preventative maintenance activities. ADOT shall conduct any reevaluation required by 23 CFR 771.129 for projects for which construction is not completed prior to the date of this MOU in accordance with the provisions of this MOU. Prior to approving any CE determination, FONSl, final EIS, or final EIS/ROD, ADOT shall ensure and document that for any proposed project the design concept, scope, and funding are consistent with the current Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), or Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), as applicable. All Class I, or EIS projects, that are funded by FHWA or require FHWA approvals, with the exception of the following projects:
a. South Mountain Freeway
b. Interstate 11 (I-11) Corridor Tier 1 EIS, Nogales to Wickenburg
c. Sonoran Corridor Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement
Highway Projects. Execute the enclosed documents as provided by Article 1306 of the specifications.
