If Testing Results are Inconsistent Sample Clauses

If Testing Results are Inconsistent. If the results of the two confirmatory testing procedures are inconsistent, then no finding shall be made regarding the drug and alcohol testing of the employee. This shall be communicated to the employee and the IAFF Local No. 1348 President in writing. The Fire Chief shall be free to initiate subsequent testing at its discretion pursuant to the reasonable suspicion provisions found in Section 4A. However, the results of the initial testing shall not be a factor in establishing “reasonable suspicion.”
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
If Testing Results are Inconsistent. If the results of the two confirmatory testing procedures are inconsistent, then no finding shall be made regarding the drug testing of the employee. This shall be communicated to the employee and the F.O.P #87 President or his/her designee in writing. The Police Chief shall be free to initiate subsequent testing at his/her discretion pursuant to the reasonable suspicion provisions found in Section 4A. However, the results of the initial testing shall not be a factor in establishing “reasonable suspicion.”

Related to If Testing Results are Inconsistent

  • SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The interim financial statements are prepared by using the same accounting policies and methods of computation as were used for the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019, except the changes in accounting policies as follows.

  • Justification and Anticipated Results The Privacy Act requires that each matching agreement specify the justification for the program and the anticipated results, including a specific estimate of any savings. 5 U.S.C. § 552a(o)(1)(B).

  • Course Description The Chief Academic Officer of any participating community college or university may request that a course be removed from the CAA transfer list. Both a community college and a university must partner to request the addition of a course to the transfer list. The university endorsement signifies that the university accepts the course and believes the course should be recommended for statewide consideration. Name of the Community College: Name of UNC Senior Institution: would like for the above course to be added to the CAA transfer course list with a status of: Pre-Major/Elective General Education or UGETC for the following discipline: Communications Humanities/Fine Arts Math Social/Behavioral Science Science would like for the above course to be deleted from the CAA transfer course list Please provide rationale for the course addition or deletion: (additional page may be utilized) Signature of Chief Academic Officer NCCCS College Date Signature of Chief Academic Officer UNC Senior Institution Date Please submit the completed and signed request to all of the following three representatives: Xxxx Xxxxxxx, Ed.D. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, M.D. Senior Vice President, Programs Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs Academic and Student Services Academic Affairs North Carolina Community College System UNC-General Administration 5016 Mail Service Center Xxxx Xxxxxx Xxx 0000 Xxxxxxx, XX 00000-0000 Xxxxxx Xxxx, XX 00000 Xx. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Director for Student Development and Association of Student Governments Advisor UNC General Administration X.X. Xxx 0000 Xxxxxx Xxxx, XX 00000 Upon receipt of the form, either Vice President may indicate endorsement of the request and send the request to the Transfer Advisory Committee for action a minimum of thirty days prior to the TAC meeting. The NC Community College System Office will solicit a response from all community colleges approved to offer the course and include the results of the vote along with their endorsement. The CAO at UNC may seek input from its respective campuses as deemed appropriate. Please Note: New, proposed courses that are not currently in the NC Community College Combined Course Library must first be submitted to the NCCCS Curriculum Review Committee, by a community college, accompanied by a request for addition to the Combined Course Library. Please see Section 15 of the Curriculum Procedures Reference Manual at: xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/academic- programs/curriculum-procedures-reference-manual-cprm Comprehensive Articulation Agreement Transfer Course List Change of Course Status to Universal General Education Transfer Component (UGETC) Form CAA02

  • Expected Results VA’s agreement with DoD to provide educational assistance is a statutory requirement of Chapter 1606, Title 10, U.S.C., Chapter 1607, Title 10, U.S.C., Chapter 30, Title 38, U.S.C. and Chapter 33, Title 38, U.S.C (Post-9/11 GI Xxxx). These laws require VA to make payments to eligible veterans, service members, guard, reservist, and family members under the transfer of entitlement provisions. The responsibility of determining basic eligibility for Chapter 1606 is placed on the DoD. The responsibility of determining basic eligibility for Chapter 30 and Chapter 33 is placed on VA, while the responsibility of providing initial eligibility data for Chapter 30 and Chapter 33 is placed on DoD. Thus, the two agencies must exchange data to ensure that VA makes payments only to those who are eligible for a program. Without an exchange of enrollment and eligibility data, VA would not be able to establish or verify applicant and recipient eligibility for the programs. Subject to the due process requirements, set forth in Article VII.B.1., 38 U.S.C. §3684A, VA may suspend, terminate, or make a final denial of any financial assistance on the basis of data produced by a computer matching program with DoD. To minimize administrative costs of implementation of the law and to maximize the service to the veteran or service member, a system of data exchanges and subsequent computer matching programs was developed. The purposes of the computer matching programs are to minimize the costs of administering the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Active Duty, the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Selected Reserve, Reserve Educational Assistance Program, and the Post-9/11 GI Xxxx program; facilitate accurate payment to eligible veterans or service members training under the Chapter of the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Active Duty, the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Selected Reserve, Reserve Educational Assistance Program, and the Post-9/11 GI Xxxx program; and to avoid payment to those who lose eligibility. The current automated systems, both at VA and DoD, have been developed over the last twenty-two years. The systems were specifically designed to utilize computer matching in transferring enrollment and eligibility data to facilitate accurate payments and avoid incorrect payments. The source agency, DMDC, stores eligibility data on its computer based system of record. The cost of providing this data to VA electronically are minimal when compared to the cost DMDC would incur if the data were forwarded to VA in a hard-copy manner. By comparing records electronically, VA avoids the personnel costs of inputting data manually as well as the storage costs of the DMDC documents. This results in a VA estimated annual savings of $26,724,091 to VA in mailing and data entry costs. DoD reported an estimated annual savings of $12,350,000. A cost-benefit analysis is at Attachment 1. In the 32 years since the inception of the Chapter 30 program, the cost savings of using computer matching to administer the benefit payments for these educational assistance programs have remained significant. The implementation of Chapter 33 has impacted the Chapter 30 program over the past 8 years (fiscal year 2010 through fiscal year 2017). Statistics show a decrease of 23 percent in the number of persons who ultimately use Chapter 30 from fiscal year 2015 to 2016. The number of persons who use Chapter 33 has consistently been above 700,000 in the past four years. VA foresees continued cost savings due to the number of persons eligible for the education programs.‌

  • Program Narrative All restricted xxxxxx courses which are taught for the purpose of qualifying an individual for restricted xxxxxx license to practice barbering shall consist of a minimum of 1200 hours of training to prepare each restricted xxxxxx to service their communities.

  • ADVERTISING RESULTS The prior written approval of the Commissioner is required in order for results of the Bid to be used by the Contractor as part of any commercial advertising. The Contractor shall also obtain the prior written approval of the Commissioner relative to the Bid or Contract for press or other media releases.

  • Drug Test Results 1. All records pertaining to department-required drug tests shall remain confidential, and shall not be provided to other employers or agencies without the written permission of the person whose records are sought. However, medical, administrative, and immediate supervisory personnel may have access to relevant portions of the records as necessary to insure the acceptable performance of the officer's job duties.

  • Method of Operations The edging of sidewalks, paved approaches, and curbs will create a distinct void; approximately one-half (1/2) inch horizontally between the structure and the turf. String trimmers will not be used in edging. Edging also includes the removal of all sand and debris from the areas designated to be edged. Upon completion of edging by the Contractor, no growth, sand or debris will touch any of the structures designated to be edged. The Contractor will remove all sand and debris from the areas designated for edging. The cost of this removal and disposal will be included in the unit price bid for mowing.

  • Drug Testing Procedures a. The testing procedures and safeguards provided in this policy shall be adhered to by any laboratory personnel administering departmental drug tests.

  • Claims Review Methodology a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject to the Quarterly Claims Review.‌

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.