Implementation and performance Sample Clauses

Implementation and performance. For certain languages targeted by PANACEA, standalone tools for different processing stages are not available. Instead, pipelines or comprehensive one-does-it-all tools cover all processing stages up to and including syntactic analysis (e.g. the Italian SynSg System, or the Charniak and RASP parsers). Almost half of the tools are implemented in Java, with C/C++ coming second together with some hybrid systems (Figure 2) involving Perl, Python, etc. More than half of the tools claim to be OS independent or, at least, operating on both Windows and Linux (Figure 3). Proprietary 38% GPL 16% Open source 9% Free for research 37% Figure 1 Licenses of NLP tools 15 xxxx://xxx.x0.xxx/TR/ws-gloss/ Hybrid: 22% Linux; 13% Java; 48% OS independent; 45% Window s; 32% C/C++; 22% Other; 9% Window s/Linux; 10% Figure 2 Programming Languages Figure 3 Operating Systems‌ 25,00 20,00 15,00 10,00 5,00 0,00 It is not easy to compare the processing speed of different categories of NLP tools, especially if pipelines of tools instead of standalone versions are documented. Depending on the perspective, the majority of most basic tools (i.e. up to lemmatization) seem to perform relatively fast (Figure 5). Nevertheless, higher level tools, like for example constituency parsers for EN, are much slower in comparison (Figure 5). XXXX Processing Tool XXXX POS Tagger ILSP SST ILSP FBT ILSP Lemmatizer XXXX Xxxxxxx ILSP MENER LT-Lemmatiser LT-Decomposer LT-MonoTermExtract TreeTagger Figure 4 Performance (hours for 20M tokens) for a subset of basic NLP tools 160,00 140,00 120,00 100,00 80,00 60,00 40,00 20,00 0,00 Charniak Xxxxx Berkeley Stanford Figure 5 Performance (hours for 20M tokens) for EN parsers (projected from their performance on Sec. 22 of Penn TB)
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Implementation and performance. Responsibilities The main responsibilities discussed in this subcategory are the project mem- bers’ responsibility, participants’ responsibility, and responsibility of the government. Each Green Deal has own project team. The project members have shared respon- sibility. The project team of the CPGD consists of six people from six different organizations. The project members’ responsibilities presented in FIGURE 8 below are not only valid for the CPGD but for others Green Deals as well. •Tasks & events •Data gathering (phone; ICT platform) •Providing assisstance if difficulties occur Knowledge management Facilitation •Community of Practice •Workshops Sharing best practices Monitoring progress & compliance •Personal meetings •ICT platform FIGURE 8 Responsibilities of the project members Interviewees emphasized that structure is crucial for the implementation of the deal. Knowledge gathering and evaluating participants’ experience is rather easy for a small group of participants and can be done by phone. In contrast, an ICT based platform for information sharing and virtual meetings is needed for larger number of participants. In addition, it was highlighted that project mem- bers and the project manager are usually having full-time jobs in addition to the tasks they perform in relation the Green Deal. For instance, the project members spend on average four to eight hours per month working on the CPGD. However, this is not an exact estimation as the hours spend on the deal may vary for differ- ent Green Deals. Thus, it was highlighted that the project members should secure enough time to spend working on the deal. “There were weeks with 20 hours, but also months without any activity from our side.” (Interview 1) The respondents indicated that the project team is responsible for facilita- tion of the process. Often, if difficulties occur, the project members offer assis- tance or advice to the participants. In other cases, the participants are encouraged to contact other organizations which are dealing or have dealt with the same problem. “We are just facilitating that everyone can learn in their own pace their own les- sons and share them with the rest.” (Interview 1) Progress and compliance is monitored by the project team through personal meetings and the ICT platform. Once in eight weeks the project team meets to discuss participants’ progress. In case some participants are not keeping the pace, the project team discusses different strategies to activate ...
Sample 1

Related to Implementation and performance

  • DELIVERY AND PERFORMANCE All work performed under contracts or task orders will be at the highest quality applicable and delivered according to Statement of Objectives (SOO), Statement of Works (SOW), or Performance Work Statements (PWS). The Contractor must deliver and perform according to the requirements of the contract or task order, and may be denied further work for substandard performance. The Government may include deliveries or performance requirements, such as (1) optional clauses, (2) agency clauses, or (3) specific clauses, in a contract or task order.

  • Assignment and Performance Neither this Agreement nor any right or interest herein shall be assigned, transferred, or encumbered without the written consent of the other party. In addition, Contractor shall not subcontract any portion of the Work required by this Agreement, except as provided in the Schedule of Subcontractor Participation. City may terminate this Agreement, effective immediately, if there is any assignment, or attempted assignment, transfer, or encumbrance, by Contractor of this Agreement or any right or interest herein without City’s prior written consent. Contractor represents that each person who will render services pursuant to this Agreement is duly qualified to perform such services by all appropriate governmental authorities, where required, and that each such person is reasonably experienced and skilled in the area(s) for which he or she will render his or her services. Contractor shall perform Contractor’s duties, obligations, and services under this Agreement in a skillful and respectable manner. The quality of Contractor’s performance and all interim and final product(s) provided to or on behalf of City shall be comparable to the best local and national standards. In the event Contractor engages any subcontractor in the performance of this Agreement, Contractor shall ensure that all of Contractor’s subcontractors perform in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Contractor shall be fully responsible for all of Contractor’s subcontractors’ performance, and liable for any of Contractor’s subcontractors’ non-performance and all of Contractor’s subcontractors’ acts and omissions. Contractor shall defend at Contractor’s expense, counsel being subject to City’s approval or disapproval, and indemnify and hold City and City’s officers, employees, and agents harmless from and against any claim, lawsuit, third party action, fine, penalty, settlement, or judgment, including any award of attorney fees and any award of costs, by or in favor of any of Contractor’s subcontractors for payment for work performed for City by any of such subcontractors, and from and against any claim, lawsuit, third party action, fine, penalty, settlement, or judgment, including any award of attorney fees and any award of costs, occasioned by or arising out of any act or omission by any of Contractor’s subcontractors or by any of Contractor’s subcontractors’ officers, agents, or employees. Contractor’s use of subcontractors in connection with this Agreement shall be subject to City’s prior written approval, which approval City may revoke at any time.

  • COMPLIANCE AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Two (2) Mandatory Compliance and Performance Evaluation Meetings shall be conducted during each Term of this Agreement. Additional meetings may be scheduled at the discretion of Department to ensure Concessionaire’s effectiveness and compliance. The meetings shall review all aspects of the Concession Operation, ensuring that quality public services are being provided on a continuing basis in accordance with the Bid Specifications and this Agreement, that operational problems/concerns are addressed on a timely basis, and that all terms and conditions are clearly understood. The meetings shall be held on site with Department-designated State Park Service staff representative(s), the on-site concession manager, and a management/supervisory representative of Concessionaire’s firm. A report form shall be utilized to document the meeting, and to identify any deficiencies and the corrective action required. A copy of the completed report form shall be provided to the on- site concession manager or the management/supervisory representative of Concessionaire’s firm and shall be attached to and made a part of this Agreement. The Mandatory Compliance and Performance Evaluation Meetings shall be held as follows: • Meeting #1 - Prior to commencement of the Period of Operation or Memorial Day, whichever comes first. • Meeting #2 - Within ten (10) calendar days after the last approved day of the Period of Operation.

  • Payment and Performance Bond Prior to the execution of this Contract, City may require Contractor to post a payment and performance bond (Bond). The Bond shall guarantee Contractor’s faithful performance of this Contract and assure payment to contractors, subcontractors, and to persons furnishing goods and/or services under this Contract.

  • Payment and Performance Bonds The Contractor shall comply with the following minimum bonding requirements:

  • Security for Performance In the event that Exhibit A Section 4 indicates the need for Consultant to provide additional security for performance of its duties under this Agreement, Consultant shall provide such additional security prior to commencement of its Required Services in the form and on the terms prescribed on Exhibit A, or as otherwise prescribed by the City Attorney.

  • Bid and Performance Security The Contractor hereby and herewith deposits with and delivers to the Minister, as security of the due fulfilment of the Contract, one of the following, which shall remain in effect for a minimum of 30 days after tender closing:

  • Continued Performance The Contractor and Contractor Parties shall continue to Perform their obligations under the Contract while any dispute concerning the Contract is being resolved.

  • F2 Monitoring of Contract Performance F2.1 The Contractor shall immediately inform the Authority if any aspect of the Contract is not being or is unable to be performed, the reasons for non-performance, any corrective action and the date by which that action will be completed.

  • Excused Performance 6.1 Notwithstanding the occurrence of a Force Majeure Event, in which case Clause 17 will govern, BT will not be liable for any failure or delay to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement (including any of its obligations to meet any Service Levels) to the extent that BT’s failure or delay in performing arises as a result of:

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!