In Egypt. (i) in respect of tax withheld at source, on amounts paid or credited on or after the first day of January in the calendar year next following that in which the Agreement enters into force; and
(ii) in respect of other taxes, for taxation years beginning on or after the first day of January in the calendar year next following that in which the Agreement enters into force;
In Egypt. (i) as respects tax withheld at the source on amounts paid or credited on or after the first day of January in the calendar year following that in which the notice is given; and
(ii) as respects other taxes for taxation years beginning on or after the first day of January in the calendar year following that in which the notice is given.
In Egypt. Each scholarship holder is entitled to receive German language and intercultural training in Egypt up to two months before the candidates’ travel to Germany. • Distribution among language centers will be defined by the DAAD Cairo office. • After the elapse of language course a unified final exam will be conducted at Goethe Institute Cairo/ Alexandria. • For the candidates who didn’t pass the final exam the DAAD may offer the possibility to attend the second crash course at the Goethe Institute and therefore a second test. • In that case, the decision will be taken by the DAAD. The test fees should be covered by the candidate whereas the crash course fees will be covered by DAAD. • A per diem will be provided to the scholarship holders according to the distance between the scholars’ home University/Institute and language course center. • Scholarship holders are expected to arrange for their own health and liability insurance for these courses.
In Egypt. (i) in respect of tax withheld at source, on amounts paid or credited on or after the first day of January in the calendar year next following that in which the period specified in the said notice of termination expires; and
(ii) in respect of other taxes, for taxation years beginning on or after the first day of January in the calendar year next following that in which the period specified in the said notice of termination expires;
In Egypt the tax on income derived from immovable property (including the agriculture land tax and the building tax), - the unified tax on income of individuals, - the tax on corporation profits, - the duty for the development of the financial resources of the State, - supplementary taxes imposed as percentage of taxes mentioned above or otherwise, (hereinafter referred to as “Egyptian tax”).
In Egypt. Provide details relating to the prevention of your rights of access to your child(ren).
In Egypt. Steel Rebar, the Panel rejected the argument of one of the parties whereby the requirement of a written analysis of the Article 3.4 factors would be exclusively governed by Article 12 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement: "Nor do we consider, as suggested by Egypt, that the requirement of a written analysis of the Article 3.4 factors is exclusively governed by Article 12 of the AD Agreement (public notice and explanation of determinations). While Article 12 contains a requirement to publish, and to make available to the interested parties in the investigation, some form of a report on the investigating authority's determination, this is, as the Appellate Body has noted, a procedural requirement having to do with due process, rather than with the relevant substantive analytical requirements (which in the context of this claim are found in Article 3.4)."246 183. The Panel in Russia – Commercial Vehicles held that explanations regarding dumping margins in the part of the Russian investigating authority's determination dealing with cumulation were not relevant to whether the authority had considered the magnitude of dumping margins as an injury factor for purposes of Article 3.4:
In Egypt. Steel Rebar, Türkiye claimed that because the period of investigation for dumping ended on 31 December 1998, and most of the injury found by the investigating authorities occurred in the first quarter of 1999, the investigating authorities had failed to demonstrate that dumping and injury occurred at the same point in time and that there was a link between the imports that were specifically found to be dumped and the injury found, violating Articles 3.5 and 3.
