Incentive Award Selection. (1) TIPs/RIAs. College or unit committees for the TIP and RIA award programs shall be elected by and from the unit employees. The committees shall equitably represent the departments or units within them. Employees who plan to apply in the current cycle for a particular award shall not be eligible to serve on the committee. A committee chairperson for each incentive award program shall be elected by and from the college/unit committee. The chairperson shall charge the committee that members shall only consider the merits of the application. No additional outside information or discussion of position, e.g., instructor vs. tenure track employee, past awards, current salary, etc., may be considered, nor may additional criteria be used. The committee shall review the award applications and shall submit a ranked list of recommended employees to the xxxx or xxxx’x representative. In ranking the applicants, committee members shall only consider the merits of the application.
a. Each committee member shall review all applications and transmit a preliminary ranking to the committee chair. Committee members may rank as many applicants as they deem merit the award, with the highest rank given to the top candidate (i.e., the highest rank equals the number of applicants, N), the next highest rank being N-1, and so on. Applications that are not deemed acceptable for an award by a committee member shall be left unranked in that committee member’s rankings.
b. In larger colleges or units, subcommittees may be formed from the committee at-large in the interest of efficient evaluation of the incentive award applications. Each subcommittee must include at least three members, and every member of the committee at- large must serve on a subcommittee. The applications to be reviewed shall be equitably partitioned among the subcommittees. The subcommittees shall follow the ranking procedure outlined above to determine which applications they recommend to the committee at-large. Then the committee at-large shall be convened to review the applications recommended by the subcommittees.
c. The committee chair shall convene the committee (at-large) and review their initial rankings. Discussion shall be limited to information contained in the application and may focus on applicants with few or dispersed rankings.
d. Following this discussion, the committee shall use a secret ballot to rank candidates using the procedure outlined in (a) above.
e. A majority of voting committee members ...
Incentive Award Selection. TIPs/RIAs. College or unit committees for the TIP and RIA award programs 93 shall be elected by and from the unit employees. The committees shall equitably represent the 94 departments or units within them. Employees who plan to apply for a particular award in the current or 95 immediately following cycle shall not be eligible to serve on the committee. A committee chairperson for 96 each incentive award program shall be elected by and from the college/unit committee. The chairperson 97 shall charge the committee that members shall only consider the merits of the application. No additional 98 outside information or discussion of position, e.g., instructor vs. tenure track faculty, past awards, current 99 salary, etc., may be considered. The committee shall review the award applications and shall submit a 100 ranked list of recommended employees to the xxxx or xxxx’x representative. In ranking the applicants, 101 committee members shall only consider the merits of the application. The committee shall not impose any 2016-2017 Article 23 Status Quo 102 numerical criteria or weightings during the ranking process, and for completed applications, departures 103 from the application specifications may impact but shall not disqualify an application.
Incentive Award Selection. 176 (1) TIPs/RIAs. College or unit committees for the TIP and RIA award 177 programs shall be elected by and from the unit employees. The committees shall 178 equitably represent the departments or units within them. Employees who plan to apply 179 for a particular award in the current or immediately following cycle shall not be eligible 180 to serve on the committee. A committee chairperson for each incentive award program 181 shall be elected by and from the college/unit committee. The chairperson shall charge the 182 committee that members shall only consider the merits of the application. No additional 183 outside information or discussion of position, e.g., instructor vs. tenure track faculty, past 184 awards, current salary, etc., may be considered. The committee shall review the award 185 applications and shall submit a ranked list of recommended employees to the xxxx or 186 xxxx’x representative. In ranking the applicants, committee members shall only consider 187 the merits of the application. The committee shall not impose any numerical criteria or 188 weightings during the ranking process, and for completed applications, departures from 189 the specifications in 23.5(e) may impact but shall not disqualify an application. 190 (a) Each committee member shall review all applications and 191 transmit a preliminary ranking to the committee chair. Committee members may rank as 192 many applicants as they deem merit the award, with 1 being the highest, 2 the next 193 highest, and so on. Applications that are not deemed acceptable for an award shall be left 194 unranked. The committee chair shall determine the number of ranked votes for each 195 applicant, the arithmetic mean ranking, and the variance in ranking. 196 (b) The committee chair shall convene the committee and review 197 their initial rankings. Discussion shall be limited to information contained in the 198 application and may focus on applicants with a large variance in rankings, to try to 199 identify the cause of and reduce disparate rankings. 200 (c) Following this discussion, the committee shall use a secret 201 ballot to rank candidates using the procedure stated above. 202 (d) A majority of voting committee members must rank an 203 applicant for that employee to be eligible for an incentive award. 204 (e) The applicant with the lowest mean score will have the 205 highest priority for an incentive award, the applicant with the next lowest mean score the 206 next highest priority, and s...
Incentive Award Selection. TIPs/RIAs. College or unit committees for the TIP and RIA award programs 95 shall be elected by and from the unit employees. The committees shall equitably represent the 96 departments or units within them. Employees who plan to apply for a particular award in the current 97 or immediately following cycle shall not be eligible to serve on the committee. A committee 98 chairperson for each incentive award program shall be elected by and from the college/unit
Incentive Award Selection. TIPs/RIAs. College or unit committees for the TIP and RIA award programs shall be elected by 2545 and from the unit employees. The committees shall equitably represent the departments or units within 2546 them. Employees who plan to apply for a particular award shall not be eligible to serve on the committee. A 2547 committee chairperson for each incentive award program shall be elected by and from the college/unit 2548 committee. The chairperson shall charge the committee that members shall only consider the merits of the 2549 application. No additional outside information or discussion of position, e.g., instructor vs. tenure track 2550 employee, past awards, current salary, etc., may be considered, nor may additional criteria be used. The 2551 committee shall review the award applications and shall submit a ranked list of recommended employees to 2552 the xxxx or xxxx’x representative. In ranking the applicants, committee members shall only consider the 2553 merits of the application.
Incentive Award Selection. TIPs/RIAs. College or unit committees for the TIP and RIA award programs 93 shall be elected by and from the unit employees. The committees shall equitably represent the 94 departments or units within them. Employees who plan to apply for a particular award in the current or 95 immediately following cycle shall not be eligible to serve on the committee. A committee chairperson for 96 each incentive award program shall be elected by and from the college/unit committee. The chairperson 97 shall charge the committee that members shall only consider the merits of the application. No additional 98 outside information or discussion of position, e.g., instructor vs. tenure track faculty, past awards, current 99 salary, etc., may be considered. The committee shall review the award applications and shall submit a 100 ranked list of recommended employees to the xxxx or xxxx’x representative. In ranking the applicants, 101 committee members shall only consider the merits of the application. The committee shall not impose any 2016-2017 Article 23 Status Quo 102 numerical criteria or weightings during the ranking process, and for completed applications, departures 103 from the application specifications may impact but shall not disqualify an application.
