Individual Subject Criteria Sample Clauses

Individual Subject Criteria. If any of the criteria below are met by an individual subject, then no further dosing will occur at any of the study sites until a review of all available safety information is performed by the DSMB, Medical Monitor, and Sponsor. Appropriate Regulatory Agencies and Ethics Committees will be informed as applicable. If it is later determined that further dosing can be performed safely then an application for a substantial protocol amendment will be submitted to the appropriate Regulatory Agencies and Ethics Committees, if applicable. Stopping criteria for an individual subject includes: • Grade 3 or higher CTCAE AEs possibly or probably related to study drug as determined by the investigator and sponsor; • Grade 4 CTCAE AEs regardless of relation to study drug as determined by the investigator and sponsor; • Any SAEs thought to be related to the study drug as determined by the investigator and sponsor. For subjects experiencing any hepatic AEs or SAEs judged by the investigator or sponsor to be related to study drug, the investigator, DSMB, Medical Monitor and Sponsor will review all available safety data and make a determination to proceed with one of the following options: • If the event was a drug-induced liver injury (DILI), considered as increases in aminotransferases (AT) >3 x ULN or >3 x baseline where baseline is defined as the average values of Screening and Day -1, no additional subjects will be dosed until it is determined that it is safe to proceed and in addition the frequency of blood chemistries will increase to daily, if appropriate. − Repeat testing of ALT, AST, ALP, TBL will be performed within 48-72 hours to confirm the abnormality. − If there are persistent elevations of AT > 3 x ULN or a 2-fold increase above baseline values (for those subjects with elevated values prior to drug exposure) upon repeat testing then close observation visits should be implemented and/or discontinuation of drug should be considered. Close Observations are described in Section 7.8. • If the event was not a DILI, as defined above, one of the following actions will be taken: − Dose an entire additional cohort at the same or lower dose than the dose taken by the subject that experienced the event in question; − Continue to pause the study, until it is determined, that it is safe to proceed. A decision to discontinue or temporarily interrupt the study drug for a subject will be considered based on following criteria: • If ALT/AST baseline measurements (BLM) are <2...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Individual Subject Criteria

  • Exclusion Criteria Subjects fulfilling any of the following criteria are not eligible for participation in this study.

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Qualification Criteria The College may offer or an employee may request an early retirement incentive provided the employee meets the following qualifications:

  • Additional RO Review Criteria (1) In addition to the requirements in Subparagraph 34A, the RO must:

  • Desirable Selection Criteria 1. Possession of, or significant progression toward the attainment of a post graduate qualification in area of specialty.

  • General Criteria a) Approved varieties shall be those varieties recommended by the Department, the Corporation, or those listed in the Atlantic Provinces Field Crop Guide, Publication 100A.

  • Service Eligibility Criteria 4.3.4.1 High capacity EELs must comply with the following service eligibility requirements:

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is an NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram with the exception of the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”) to be completed by the LEA, and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by XXX xxxxxxxx to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. XXX shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by XXX.

  • Power Factor Design Criteria Developer shall design the Large Generating Facility to maintain an effective power delivery at demonstrated maximum net capability at the Point of Interconnection at a power factor within the range established by the Connecting Transmission Owner on a comparable basis, until NYISO has established different requirements that apply to all generators in the New York Control Area on a comparable basis. The Developer shall design and maintain the plant auxiliary systems to operate safely throughout the entire real and reactive power design range. The Connecting Transmission Owner shall not unreasonably restrict or condition the reactive power production or absorption of the Large Generating Facility in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!