Grade 4 means that, under the Originator’s loan grading system, which ranks loans based on its analysis of credit quality of the underlying assets, the Obligor is performing above expectations, the trends and risk factors are generally favorable and the Loan involves the least amount of risk in the Originator’s portfolio.
Grade 4 means an operator able to operate three sections of plant competently.
Grade 4 means an employee whose duties require competence and diligence in work and the operation of ancillary equipment and machinery or to carry out a major function with limited supervision within a Section.
Examples of Grade 4 in a sentence
Grade 4 master’s degree with a minimum of 30 graduate credits in an approved instructional field(s), or equivalency or a bachelor’s degree plus approved contact hours of occupationally related discipline, or a bachelor’s degree plus 60 graduate credits or equivalency in an approved instructional field(s).
Grade 4 - Team: Plan work for the team; allocate tasks to members of the team; provide training for team members.
Grade 4 - Business Financial: Prepare financial reports; draft financial forecasts/budgets; undertake and document costing procedures.
Grade 4 ELAGrade 4 MathState AssessmentGrade 4 ELAGrade 4 MathTask 2.
If the locking bar is internal, it must be used with a padlock conforming to BS EN 12320 Security Grade 4 (including amendments).
More Definitions of Grade 4
Grade 4 means an employee able to carry out three tasks competently.
Grade 4 means an Employee appointed as such who: Has completed an appropriate course in a skill stream and is able to exercise the skills and knowledge of that study or an Employee who has advanced skill (either specialised or broadly based) in the Employee's trade or skill stream including trades person cook. A Grade 4 Employee works above and beyond an Employee at Grade 3 and to the level of the Employee's training:
Grade 4. Life-threatening • Grade 5: Fatal An event is defined as “serious” when it meets at least one of the predefined outcomes as described in the definition of an SAE, not when it is rated as severe. The PI (or designee) should determine the severity of the AE based on the overall clinical importance or significance of the finding for that individual patient. If a lab abnormality is deemed to be clinically significant, according to the criteria described in Section 10.3.1, it will be reported as an AE, and the AE grade reported should correspond to the grade of the laboratory abnormality on the CTCAE grading scale. If an AE that was reported during the study increases or decreases in severity, then that AE is given a resolution date and time and a new record initiated with the new severity. If the severity of an AE remains the same, the AE will be kept open through to resolution.
Grade 4. A Grade 4 employee:
i. Is required to have a Degree or Diploma qualification or other qualification or extensive industry experience.
ii. Works under general work instructions and is expected to supervise other staff, trainees and students on practicum.
iii. Undertakes complex tasks and is expected to vary work routines as necessary.
iv. Develops and implements work plans within the centre.
v. Is required to design work systems used within the centre, and develop policies, practices and procedures for use by other staff, based on their experience and expertise (e.g. programming, administration, health & safety).
vi. May be required to be in charge of the centre from time to time;
vii. Shall be classified on engagement based on relevant experience, as per clause 10 2; and:
(1) Will progress with yearly increments to Step 4, and is eligible for advancement to step 9, and such advancement and subsequent continued classification shall be based on suitable work achievement; or
(2) If holding a Registered Nurse or Teacher 2 qualification, will progress with yearly increments to Step 9; or
(3) If holding a Teacher 3 qualification 3 shall be classified as at least Step 3 and will progress with yearly increments to Step 12; or
(4) If holding a Teacher 4 qualification 4 shall be classified as at least Step 5 and will progress with yearly increments to Step 13.
Grade 4. Life-threatening • Grade 5: Fatal • The Investigator is obligated to assess the relationship between the study intervention and each occurrence of each AE or SAE. An Investigator causality assessment must be provided for all AEs (both nonserious and serious). This assessment must be recorded in the CRF and on any additional forms, as appropriate. The definitions for the causality assessments are as follows: − Not related: There is no reasonable possibility the study intervention caused the AE. ▪ The AE has a more likely alternative etiology; it may be due to underlying or concurrent illness, complications, concurrent treatments, or effects of another concurrent drug. ▪ The event does not follow a reasonable temporal relationship to administration of the study intervention. − Related: There is a reasonable possibility the study intervention caused the AE. ▪ The AE has a temporal relationship to the administration of the study intervention. ▪ The event does not have a likely alternative etiology. ▪ The event corresponds with the known pharmaceutical profile of the study intervention. ▪ There is improvement on discontinuation and/or reappearance on rechallenge. • The Investigator will use clinical judgment to determine the relationship. • Alternative causes, such as underlying disease(s), concomitant therapy, and other risk factors, as well as the temporal relationship of the event to study intervention administration will be considered and investigated. • The Investigator will also consult the IB and/or Product Information, for marketed products, in his/her assessment. • For each AE/SAE, the Investigator must document in the medical notes that he/she has reviewed the AE/SAE and has provided an assessment of causality. • There may be situations in which an SAE has occurred, and the Investigator has minimal information to include in the initial report to Xxxxxxx. However, it is very important that the Investigator always make an assessment of causality for every event before the initial transmission of the SAE data to Alexion. • The Investigator may change his/her opinion of causality in light of follow-up information and send an SAE follow-up report with the updated causality assessment. • The causality assessment is one of the criteria used when determining regulatory reporting requirements. • The Investigator is obligated to perform or arrange for the conduct of supplemental measurements and/or evaluations as medically indicated or as requested by Xxxxxxx t...
Grade 4. Operator/Strip Starter-Pressroom, Punchmaker, Toll Gate Attendant START 45 DAYS 3 MONTHS 6 MONTHS 8 MONTHS 10 MONTHS 12 MONTHS 9.46 10.10 10.91 11.70 12.51 13.31 14.09 Grade 5: Plater B, Operator/Strip-Starter/Inspector-Pressroom START 45 DAYS 3 MONTHS 6 MONTHS 8 MONTHS 10 MONTHS 12 MONTHS 9.75 10.39 11.15 11.92 12.69 13.46 14.24 Grade 6: Machine Operator-Bandolier, Shipper START 45 DAYS 3 MONTHS 6 MONTHS 8 MONTHS 10 MONTHS 12 MONTHS 10.04 10.67 11.49 12.29 13.11 13.93 14.73 Grade 7: Assistant Setup-Electronics, In-Process Inspector B, Maintenance Mechanic B, Maintenance Machinist C, Material Handler, Receiver, Distribution Coordinator START 45 DAYS 3 MONTHS 6 MONTHS 8 MONTHS 10 MONTHS 12 MONTHS 10.32 10.96 11.85 12.75 13.64 14.53 15.41
Grade 4. The patient has severe ulceration with inability to swallow any food. The NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03 grades OM depending on oral function. These grades are described below (National Cancer Institute, 2010):