Inference. All Parties have had the opportunity to review this Agreement prior to execution, and no adverse inference shall be made against the party drafting this Agreement in any dispute over the interpretation of any provision herein.
Inference. Again, while not conclusive by itself, this data suggests that the Existing Site has experienced a twelve percent (12%) decrease vs. expectation during the Post Period due to localized factors specific to the Existing Site trade area, and not due to DMA-wide variables. Multi-State Disclosure Document Control No. 040114 Exhibit E to Procedures for Resolving Disputes Relating to the Development of New Restaurants Development Agreement #000000 Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxxx STEP II: If there appears to be an impact on the Existing Site that is due to factors within its trade area, rather than due to broader, DMA-wide trends (Example 2 above), identify all significant factors that may have contributed to this impact in addition to the New Restaurant. These could include but may not be limited to the following:
Inference. Many of the Existing Site’s customers will be drawn to the traffic generators in the new center, and allocate some of their limited eating out dollars to whatever restaurant choices are available when they are there, since it is convenient. All or a substantial portion of the 8% drop in sales can reasonably be attributed to the new center. Multi-State Disclosure Document Control No. 040114 Exhibit E to Procedures for Resolving Disputes Relating to the Development of New Restaurants Development Agreement #000000 Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxxx Example 4: Same as Example 3, except that a new EPL Restaurant opens at the new Power Center 6 months after the last anchor tenant opens. Existing Site’s sales then decline further, to a 12% overall decline vs. before the Power Center opened, as follows: Existing Site’s Avg. Monthly Sales: Amount Cumulative % Change 12 months prior to New Power Center opening $ 83,333 — First 6 months New Power Center open $ 76,666 (8 %) Next 12 months New Restaurant Open $ 73,333 (12 %) Inference: It would appear that the majority of the decline is due to the existence of the new Power Center (8%), and that only about 4% is due to the New Restaurant (= 12%-8%).
Inference the relation can be identified and classified through inference via other existing relations (e.g. two events linked to two different timexes can be ordered by means of the comparison of the values of timexes only). •
Inference. The given table presents the results of t-tests conducted on various aspects related to academic responsibilities and work environment in academia. Here are the inferences drawn from the provided data:
Inference. Many of the Existing Site's customers will be drawn to the traffic generators in the new center, and allocate some of their limited eating out dollars to whatever restaurant choices are available when they are there, since it is convenient. All or a substantial portion of the 8% drop in sales can reasonably be attributed to the new center. Example 4: Same as Example 3, except that a new EPL Restaurant opens at the new Power Center 6 months after the last anchor tenant opens. Existing Site's sales then decline further, to a 12% overall decline vs. before the Power Center opened, as follows: Existing Site’s Avg. Monthly Sales: Amount Cumulative % Change 12 months prior to New Power Center opening $ 83,333 — First 6 months New Power Center open $ 76,666 (8 )% Next 12 months New Restaurant Open $ 73,333 (12 )% Inference: It would appear that the majority of the decline is due to the existence of the new Power Center (8%), and that only about 4% is due to the New Restaurant (= 12%- 8%).
Inference. No inference shall be drawn in favor of or against any party based on its participation in the drafting of this Agreement. [Signature Page Follows] Elk Ridge, Inc. (7/7/05) 22 CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. BOXES AND ASTERISKS DENOTE SUCH OMISSION.
Inference. (except for the intercept) must be eliminated to Bayesian inference is based on the posterior of the model. In terms of the GLMM representation of the model we obtain Yp p(βunp, βpen|y) ∝ L(y, βunp, βpen) p(βpen|τ 2)
Inference. The above methodological aspects differ in terms of scope and complexity. For instance, accuracy assessment addresses almost the whole statistical production process: from collecting data through data processing to data analysis. Almost all stages of statistical production process have something to do with accuracy. Some issues are however more Big Data specific. Dealing with changes in data sources is a good example. Being technology driven, Big Data sources change more rapidly over time (certainly compared to administrative data) and NSIs need to adapt accordingly. If NSIs do not adapt to such changes, variation over time could be attributed not only in variation in the object of interest, but also in the variation in data sources as well. Such a component in overall variation is missing in survey-based statistics. Literature is abundant with Big Data good practices. However, most of those good practices are one-time-only research work. For instance, a group of expert take a Big Data source, process data and come up with inference about the company’s business model gap, or gaps in city management, etc. The researchers do not care about data source stability or the ability to link the data with other data sources in the long run. Production of Big Data based statistics on a regular base is quite different. For this, NSIs -for instance- need to deal with changing data sources and with a lot of restriction on the access to that data. WP5 clearly demonstrated that Big Data sources are not readily available. Despite the fact that no WP has reached a full statistical production cycle yet, there are already many insights on the use of Big Data for official statistics. The accumulated experience obtained so far is used to derive steps on how to embed Big Data in official statistics (see 3. Conclusions). Looking back we can make an association with sample surveys. Despite being the foundation of nearly all statistical production process nowadays, sample surveys have not been accepted quickly by social sciences. In the beginning doing a survey has been ridiculously compared with a “cartographer to map only one square in ten on his grid.”(Ayrton, 2017). In the remainder of this report, the above mentioned 11 methodological issues are described one by one, followed by conclusions.
Inference. An inference procedure is not a list of facts or rules, but a program. It indicates how to do something, such as how to do diagnosis or how to teach. An inference procedure can also be called a strategy. It controls how knowledge is used. Inference procedures apply domain models to particular problems. There are as many kinds as inference procedures as reasons for wanting to use a model: design, diagnosis, repair, auditing, prediction, and control are the most typical reasons. An inference procedure, then, is a program for gathering information about system behavior and the environment (data) in order to make assertions about the system producing this behavior (diagnosis), the system that could produce this behavior (design and control), or how a system will behave (prediction). Each inference procedure constructs a situation-specific model of some system. There are four general inferential operators which generate transformations on processes: • diagnosis is an analytic technique (describing processes in an existing system), • design is a synthetic technique (designing a new system). • control is a situation specific technique (describing how the current system should be configured, and possibly what the input should be, to produce desired behavior). • assembly is a constructive technique (describing a manufacturing process within the model that will produce the desired new system). Within EduSpace, inference procedures apply to the subject material (objects and events in the visible world), the instructional process (topics, initiatives, and outcomes), and the student’s reasoning process (the student's actions and strategic explanations for them). In the EduSpace modeling tools, each inferential strategy is implemented as a partition of the dynamic database. That partitioned database represents a particular environment which follows a particular set of inferential rules. Behavior and computation in the database are achieved by match-and-substitute algorithms running on the EduSpace Accelerator Board.
