Loss of Longevity Sample Clauses

Loss of Longevity. (1) If a faculty member receives a “Needs Improvement” or an “Unsatisfactory” evaluation on the summary/overall evaluation form (Form C1), the Evaluation Committee shall provide him/her with a written Improvement Plan that specifies what he/she must do to receive a “Satisfactory” on the subsequent term’s follow-up evaluation. The Improvement Plan must be reasonable, i.e. the terms and conditions established by the plan must be achievable. The follow-up evaluation must be conducted the following regular term that the faculty member teaches, but not until at least two (2) months have elapsed from the date of the meeting at which the evaluatee received the Improvement Plan from the evaluation committee. (2) A faculty member will be removed from the longevity list in either of these two scenarios listed below:

Loss of Longevity. (1) If a faculty member receives a “Needs Improvement” or an “Unsatisfactory” evaluation from two or more of the evaluators, the Evaluation Committee shall provide him/her with a written Improvement Plan that specifies what he/she must do to receive a “Satisfactory” on the follow-up evaluation. The Improvement Plan must be reasonable, i.e. the terms and conditions established by the plan must be achievable. The follow-up evaluation must be conducted the following semester, but not until at least two months have elapsed from the date of the meeting at which the evaluatee received the Improvement Plan from the evaluation committee. (2) Two consecutive performance evaluations with summary ratings (Form C1) of “Unsatisfactory,” or three consecutive evaluations with summary ratings of two “Needs Improvement” followed by an “Unsatisfactory” will result in loss of future assignments and removal from the longevity list. See 5.B(1)(e). A. Upon completion of the evaluation process the following forms will be included in the faculty member’s personnel file (if applicable): Form A1: Faculty Self-Appraisal Report for Full/Part-Time Faculty Form A2: Administrator and Peer Evaluation Form for Full-Time Tenured Faculty Form A4: Administrator and Peer Evaluation Form for Non-Contract Faculty Form B3: Summary of Student Evaluation of Teaching Effectiveness Form B4: Summary of Student Evaluation of Counselor/Librarian Effectiveness Form C1: Summary Administrator and Peer Evaluation Form for Non-Contract and Contract Tenured Faculty Form C3: President’s Summary Evaluation Report

Loss of Longevity. If a faculty member receives a “Needs Improvement” or an “Unsatisfactory” evaluation from two or more of the evaluators, the Evaluation Committee shall provide him/her with a written Improvement Plan that specifies what he/she must do to receive a “Satisfactory” on the follow-up evaluation. The Improvement Plan must be reasonable, i.e. the terms and conditions established by the plan must be achievable. The follow-up evaluation must be conducted the following semester, but not until at least two months have elapsed from the date of the meeting at which the evaluatee received the Improvement Plan from the evaluation committee.