Loss of Longevity. (1) If a faculty member receives a “Needs Improvement” or an “Unsatisfactory” evaluation on the summary/overall evaluation form (Form C1), the Evaluation Committee shall provide him/her with a written Improvement Plan that specifies what he/she must do to receive a “Satisfactory” on the subsequent term’s follow-up evaluation. The Improvement Plan must be reasonable, i.e. the terms and conditions established by the plan must be achievable. The follow-up evaluation must be conducted the following regular term that the faculty member teaches, but not until at least two (2) months have elapsed from the date of the meeting at which the evaluatee received the Improvement Plan from the evaluation committee.
Loss of Longevity. (1) If a faculty member receives a “Needs Improvement” or an “Unsatisfactory” evaluation from two or more of the evaluators, the Evaluation Committee shall provide him/her with a written Improvement Plan that specifies what he/she must do to receive a “Satisfactory” on the follow-up evaluation. The Improvement Plan must be reasonable, i.e. the terms and conditions established by the plan must be achievable. The follow-up evaluation must be conducted the following semester, but not until at least two months have elapsed from the date of the meeting at which the evaluatee received the Improvement Plan from the evaluation committee.
