Masculine/Feminine. Whenever the masculine is used in this Agreement, it shall be also considered as if the feminine has been used.
Masculine/Feminine the masculine gender as used herein shall also mean and include the feminine gender unless otherwise indicated in the context.
Masculine/Feminine. The use of the masculine gender in this Agreement shall be considered also to include the feminine.
Masculine/Feminine. The masculine gender is also used for the feminine gender; whenever necessary, substitutions are made.
Masculine/Feminine. All provisions in this Collective Agreement apply to all Employees. In this Collective Agreement, the masculine gender also represents the female gender.
Masculine/Feminine. Where the masculine pronoun is used in this Agreement, it shall be deemed to include the feminine and vice versa where the context so requires.
Masculine/Feminine. Determiner Adjective Determiner Adjective Singular Plural % () % () % () % () % () % () % () % () In order to test whether the proportion wrong answers depend on (combinations of) the three explanatory variables (Masculine vs Feminine; Determiner vs Adjective; Singular vs Plural) several binomial regression models were fitted to the data. The fit of these models can be compared using a likelihood-ratio test (as the difference in −2 log likelihood of nested models is chi-square distributed with difference in number of parameters as degrees of freedom). In Table 2 the fit of the tested models is presented. Table 2: Fit and comparison of different models to estimate the influence of singular/plural, feminine/masculine and determiner/adjective on errors of Dutch students. Model − log like-lihood Comparison Models χ df p . Constant . vs . <. . + S[ingular () vs Plural ()] . vs . <. . + M[ascul. () vs Feminine ()] . vs . <. . + D[eterm. () vs Adjective ()] . vs . . . + S * M . vs . . . + S * D . vs . <. . + M * D . vs . . . + S * M * D . If the distinction Singular-Plural (S) is added to the model, the model is a significant better description of the observed data than without this distinction (χ2(1) = 29.15; p < 0.001). For both the distinction Masculine-Feminine (M) and Determiner-Adjective (D), the fit of the model increases significantly if either effect is taken into account (see Table 2). In the remainder of the models (5–8) different interaction effects are sub- sequently added to the model. Comparison of the fit of the model shows that adding the interaction between S(ingular – Plural) and M(asculine – Feminine) does not improve the fit of the model over a model with only the three main effects (χ2(1) = 0.03; p = 0.834). The interaction effect between S(ingular – Plural) and D(eterminer – Adjective) also fails to reach significance as well (χ2(1) = 1.27; p = 0.260). However, the interaction between M(asculine – Feminine) and D(eterminer – Adjective) does explain differences in error rate in the writing of Dutch students (χ2(1) = 12.26; p < 0.001). Finally, the interaction between the three explanatory variables (S * M * D) did not reach significance (χ2(1) = 0.50; p = 0.481). Hence, the most sparse model which explains the (relative) error rate best contains nex...
Masculine/Feminine. The use of s/he will be used throughout this document to indicate both genders.
Masculine/Feminine. Singular and Plural Wherever the singular or masculine is used in this Agreement, it shall be considered as if the plural or feminine has been used where the context of the party or parties hereto so require. Wherever the word Administrator is used in this Agreement shall be considered to signify "or other designated
Masculine/Feminine. Where the singular or the masculine expressions are used in this Agreement, the same shall be construed as meaning the feminine or the neuter gender where the context so requires and the converse shall also apply.
