Discussion and Conclusion. All indices discussed in this article can be defended and have their use, but their meanings are not alike. We wish to demon- strate these differences from an example, trying to capture each index’s meaning in nontechnical terminology. We study a mea- surement system producing measurement values on a five-point nominal scale. The distribution of the true values P and the dis- system M (with aM classes). Let its reproducibility be charac- terized by νM , and let A νM (the largest integer strictly smaller than νM ) and B νM A. We construct a hypotheti- cal system N that has identical reproducibility as M, but clearly interpretable properties. System N measures on a (A 1)-point scale. It is applied in a population of objects with distribution PN = (1/(A + 1), 1/(A + 1),..., 1/(A + 1)). The stochastic properties of N are specified by the (A + 1) × (A + 1) matrix + = − = ⎝ ] 1 ··· 0 0 0 .
Discussion and Conclusion. Any measure of ecological quality or status is of little value without some knowledge of its level of uncertainty. To measure the uncertainty on lake assessment, it is important to have an understanding of the variability of the metric value (Xxxxxx et al., 2006). To estimate this variability within metric values and to quantify the different components, especially the variability due to sampling, the WISER project organized a replicate field sampling program. This design allows to accurately estimate the sampling variability of the metric values. Here we conducted a time-for-space analysis in which we use an existing long term data series of 23 years of macroinvertebrate data and abiotic variables of a Dutch shallow lake. Analysis dataset 1981-2004 When we take the entire dataset into account (1981-2004) a large proportion of the total variation (70%) in the MM values can be attributed to changes in abiotic factors, especially chlorophlyll A. The higher the chlorophyll A concentration the lower the values of MM. The remaining 30 % can’t be explained by this model, and is the unexplained variation. This can also be expressed as the standard deviation of the residuals (SDr) which is 0.04. For the values of % EPT abundance abiotic factors NH4, NO3 and chlorophyll A explain the majority of the variation (80%). The unexplained variation in %EPT abundance is related to different sources, such as sampling variation, taxonomic identification errors, natural temporal variation or unknown sources. Due to lack of information about these sources we cannot divide this unexplained variation any further. That’s why the value that we found for the SDr value of %EPT abundance (0.11) is larger than the value that Xxxxxx et al. (2006) found for the average sampling SD for % EPT abundance (0.031) of samples taken with the RIVPACS method in different Austrian river. Afterall, sampling variation is just a part of the total unexplained variation we found. Similar to Xxxxxx et al. (2006) we find that EPT abundance, one of the individual component metrics of MM has a larger variance than multimetric MM. Because the lower SDr of MM, the Multimetric MM has a higher precision to estimate the ecological status of a lake. Analysis dataset 1992-2004 Another method to improve the insights on variability or uncertainty is to use a subset of data of the stable period of the lake. This way the SDt will be smaller and is a better estimate of unexplained variation. If we look at the values o...
Discussion and Conclusion. Inviting a wide variety of stakeholders from different sectors to the MOVE pre-conference meant that the discussions that were held were very enriching for all involved, allowing participants to exchange and discuss with other participants coming from a different perspective and professional background. The recommendations that have come out of the discussions come from experienced professionals who are familiar with European (and international) youth mobility, and should be seriously considered at both European and national levels.
Discussion and Conclusion. References Artstein, R. and X. Xxxxxx. (2005). Kappa3=Alpha (or Beta). Technical Report NLE Technote 2005-01, University of Essex. Essex. Xxxxx, R. and X. Xxxxx. (1998). Word-sense distinguishability an inter-coder agreement. In Proceedings of Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Xx Xxxxxxx, B. and M. Glass. (2004). The kappa statistic: A second look. Computational Linguistics, 30(1):95- 101. Xx Xxxxxxx, B. (2000). On the usage of Kappa to evaluate agreement on coding tasks, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC). Athens, Greece. Xxxx, B.; Green, R.; Xxxxx, L.; Xxxxxx, O.; Xxxxxxx, D.; Xxxxxx, N.; Xxxxxxxxx, S.; Hovy, E.; Xxxxxx, X.X.; Mitamura, T.; Xxxxxx, F.; Xxxxxxxxxxx, A. (2004).. Semantic annotation and lexico-syntactic paraphrase. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Building Lexical Resources from Semantically Annotated Corpora, (LREC) Portugal,. Xxxxxxx, D.; Xxxxxxxxx, S.; Xxxx, X. X.; Xxxxxx, N.; Xxxxxx, F.; Xxxxxx, K.; Xxxxx, L.; Mitamura, T.; Hovy, In the NLP literature, inter-annotator agreement measures are usually presented in order to make the claim that an annotation is reliable. We have repeated arguments from previous literature that it is difficult to infer much about the absolute values of reliability measures without a context, such as an independent assessment of the significance of variables derived from the annotation. We have illustrated another use of reliability measures, namely to examine variations in reliability along different dimensions. As a consequence, we have been able to demonstrate overall improvement E.; Xxxxxx, O.; Xxxxxxxxxxx, A. (2004). Interlingual annotation of multilingual text corpora. In Proceedings of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics Workshop on Frontiers in Corpus Annotation, Boston, MA, pp. 55-62, 2004. Xxxxxxxx, C. (1998). WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press. Jaccard, P. (1908). Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bulletin de la Societe Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 44:223-270.
Discussion and Conclusion. The main results of the present study showed good agreement and reproducibility between the velocities determined by the CV, AT, and simu- lated time trial on the track with the real-time of a 10-km official race. These results corroborate the findings of another study (Xxxxx, et al., 2014), which analyzed the predictive capacity of the AT determined in the laboratory and Montreal Test (MT) (Xxxxx & Xxxxxxx, 1980) for performance
Discussion and Conclusion. The main topic of this article is the phonological properties of morphemes of the same nominal class in Fròʔò, the most striking aspect being the presence of recurrent articulatory features for each inflectional class, a case of alliterative concord. This pattern arises when several functional morphemes of the same class are linearized. The best answer of morphology is to reproduce the pairing between class and phonological features each time a function word is present. In (57), a longer sequence of functional morphemes, the same pairing is reproduced six times.
Discussion and Conclusion. This section must present the significance of results and their relation to the aims of the study. In addition, how the findings of the study affect what we know about the subject must be explained by citing the relevant literature. ☐ ☐
Discussion and Conclusion. Discussion In the case of the decriminalized abortion services offered at CHPR, the single most important finding of this study was very high overall satisfaction among abortion clients, particularly with the treatment received by healthcare professionals. Demographic characteristics, partner status and consultation type had no impact on reported satisfaction among unique individuals. The decriminalization of abortion in Uruguay received great media attention, which sometimes portrayed the multidisciplinary team as an intimidating 'panel' of experts, potentially discouraging women from continuing the abortion process (Xxxxxxx, 2014; La Nacion, 2013). This study suggests that in this setting the SRH services staff, including the multidisciplinary team, were generally perceived as respectful and supportive rather than as a barrier. In the abortion clients’ comments in this sample, positive interaction with the healthcare professionals was the most frequently mentioned aspect of their experience. This is consistent with satisfaction surveys carried out by Iniciativas Sanitarias for the harm reduction services before the decriminalization of the procedure (Xxxxxxx et al., 2010), the qualitative study by Doctors of the World (Médecins du Monde, 2014) as well as with the observations of the PI. According to one of the psychologists at CHPR, the purpose of the multidisciplinary team is to “improve the physical, psychological and social health of a woman” and to not only consider the client as a “body that walks in”, but as a person with psychological and social needs, which need to be taken into consideration during an emotionally complex process. The SRH services team at CHPR, however, has been at a champion of safe abortion for years and their attitudes may differ from other SRH services around the country. The high rate of conscientious objection in other provinces (Presidencia de la República del Uruguay, 2013) can be seen as an indicator of prevalent ambivalence about the procedure among healthcare providers elsewhere. Given that the law requires healthcare professionals to provide abortion services, only making an exception for gynecologists and only for the third consultation (during which the medication is dispensed), supportive attitudes may vary in different settings. In the Doctors of the World study, three women (none of whom received services at CHPR), reported that they felt that providers had not been impartial towards their decision to terminate t...
Discussion and Conclusion. I am pleased that Xxxxx Mountain, the DPS, and GMP were able to reach an agreement that addresses the DPS's concerns regarding Stowe Mountain's participation in the Lamoille County Loop Area-Specific Collaborative. I expect Stowe Mountain's participation in this Collaborative will be helpful as the Collaborative participants negotiate regarding the
Discussion and Conclusion. In general the types of issues discussed above may be considered findings if they are first determined to be, or to be attributable to, licensee performance deficiencies. Then, if they screen through the questions in Appendix B (and/or Appendix E) of IMC 0612, and are thus determined to be more than minor, they may be documented findings under the ROP. Their significance may then be determined as the circumstances warrant as discussed above. When SSCs and safety functions become degraded, if the proximate causes of such degradation are reasonably judged to be performance deficiencies, then inspection findings may be written and their significance assessed using the SDP. In such cases, the SDP estimates the added risk (delta CDF or delta LERF) to the public above the otherwise nominal or “baseline” risk. If a licensee’s maintenance monitoring program is in compliance with 10 CFR 50.65, then that program cannot reasonably be judged as deficient. This is true even when, for example, planned unavailability of an SSC is allowed to exceed that of a point-estimate unavailability value in the licensee’s PRA model. Note that a point-estimate value in a PRA model generally represents the median of a probability function. For regulatory assessment under the ROP, it is more appropriate to view the licensee’s 10 CFR 50.65 maintenance monitoring program as one part of their overall problem identification and resolution program. Inspection guidance related to evaluating and documenting issues in this cross-cutting area is provided in IMC 0612, IMC 0305, and other related documents. Also, as discussed above, inspecting licensee activities for conformance to regulatory guides or industry standards that are not binding documents, i.e., that are not invoked by a regulation, license condition, or technical specification, normally does not result in enforceable findings. Therefore, one of the major changes in the new revision to the procedure for ROP baseline inspection of licensee maintenance effectiveness activities (including MR implementation), IP 71111.12, reflects this fact. A portion of the revised procedure will focus inspection of MR implementation more on the requirements of rule itself with provisions of the industry guidance and the NRC regulatory guide used only as supporting information. If you have any questions regarding this issue, please contact Xx. X. Lyon of my staff at (000) 000-0000. Docket Nos. 50-254 and 50-265 cc: X. Xxxxxxxx, RGN-I X. X. Xxxxxx, RGN-I...
