Union Discussions Sample Clauses

Union Discussions. Notwithstanding Articles 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.6 and 6.7, where a College asserts that one (1) or more employees are or will be engaged on special shifts, and seeks to apply the provisions set out in Appendix C (Averaging of Hours of Work), it shall discuss the matter with the Union College/Campus Committee and hear any representations by it prior to implementation provided such representations are made promptly. Following such discussion, implementation may be effected. Once each year, the Local Union may ask the College to review the arrangement to ensure the conditions outlined in point one (1) of Appendix C continue to apply and if requested, the College shall provide the Local Union with the data used by the College in its review. If those conditions are not applicable, then the Appendix C arrangement will no longer apply. In all other cases, overtime payment will be in accordance with Articles 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.6 and 6.7.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (13)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Union Discussions. In connection with Purchaser’s proposed assumption of the respective Collective Bargaining Agreements, Seller agrees that Purchaser may, prior to the Closing Date, discuss, and if required, negotiate, with the United Steelworkers International Union (Local No. 2688) and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (Local No. 518). Seller agrees to cooperate with Purchaser and to facilitate such discussions and, if required, negotiations, if requested by Purchaser.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
Union Discussions. Notwithstanding Articles 6.1 to 6.5, where a College asserts that one (1) or more employees are engaged on special shifts, and seeks to apply the provisions set out in Appendix C (Averaging of Hours of Work), it shall discuss the matter with the Union College/Campus Committee and hear any representations by it prior to implementation provided such representations are made promptly. Following such discussion, implemen- tation may be effected. In all other cases, overtime payment will be in accordance with Articles 6.1 to 6.5.
Sample 1
Union Discussions. Retention of Standard Hours
Sample 1
Union Discussions. Notwithstanding Articles 6.1 to 6.5, where a College asserts that one (1) or more employees are engaged on special shifts, and seeks to apply the provisions set out in Appendix C (Averaging of Hours of Work), it shall discuss the matter with the Union College/Campus Committee and hear any representations by it prior to implementation provided such representations are made promptly. Following such discussion, implementation may be effected. After one (1) year, the Local Union may ask the College to review the arrangement to ensure the conditions outlined in point one (1) of Appendix C continue to apply. If those conditions are not applicable, then the Appendix C arrangement will no longer apply. In all other cases, overtime payment will be in accordance with Articles 6.1 to 6.5.
Sample 1
Union Discussions. Notwithstanding Articles to where a College asserts that one (1) or more employees are or will be engaged on special shifts, and seeks to apply the provisions set out in Appendix C (Averaging of Hours of Work), it shall discuss the matter with the Union Committee and hear any representations by it prior to implementation provided such representations are made promptly. Following such discussion, implementation may be effected. Once each year, the Local Union may ask the College to review the arrangement to ensure the conditions outlined in point one (1) of Appendix continue to apply and if requested, the College shall provide the Local Union with the data used by the College in its review, If those conditions are not applicable, then the Appendix C arrangement will no longer apply. In all other cases, overtime payment will be in accordance with Articles to
Sample 1
Union Discussions. Notwithstanding Articles to where a College asserts that one (1) or more employees are or will be engaged on special shifts, and seeks to apply the provisions set out in Appendix C (Averaging of Hours of Work), it shall discuss the matter with the Union Committee and hear any representations by it prior to implementation provided such representations are made promptly. Following such discussion, implementation may be effected. Once each year, the Local Union may ask the College to reviewthe arrangement to ensure the conditions outlined in point one (I) of Appendix C continue to apply. If those conditions are not applicable, then the Appendix C arrangement will no longer apply. In all other cases, overtime payment will be in accordance with Articles to Retention of Standard Hours No employee employed as of September other than a Support Services Officer, Programmer, Systems Analyst or Technical Support Specialist shall have Appendix C (Averaging of Hours of Work) applied while remains in current position, unless agreed to by the employee. Rest periods and any refreshment facilities required shall be as established from time to time by the College following discussion with the Union Committee.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Union Discussions. Prior to the Closing Date, Buyer may, at it discretion, contact any labor organization currently representing Business Employees to discuss and negotiate terms of employment for such Business Employees after the Closing Date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Buyer shall not undertake any “effects” bargaining for the purpose of triggering any withdrawal liability under any Multiemployer Plan provided for in the Collective Bargaining Agreements.
Sample 1

Related to Union Discussions

  • Mutual Discussions The Employer and the Union acknowledge the mutual benefits to be derived from dialogue between the parties and are prepared to discuss matters of common interest.

  • Informal Discussions The employee's concerns will be presented orally by the employee to the appropriate supervisor. Every effort shall be made by all concerned in an informal manner to develop an understanding of the facts and the issues in order to create a climate which will lead to resolution of the problem. If the employee is not satisfied with the informal discussion(s) relative to the matter in question, he/she may proceed to the formal grievance procedure.

  • Informal Discussion If an employee has a problem relating to a work situation, the employee is encouraged to request a meeting with his or her immediate supervisor to discuss the problem in an effort to clarify the issue and to work cooperatively towards settlement.

  • Existing Discussions The Company agrees that it will immediately cease and cause to be terminated any existing activities, discussions or negotiations with any Persons conducted heretofore with respect to any Acquisition Proposal. The Company agrees that it will take the necessary steps to promptly inform the individuals or entities referred to in the first sentence hereof of the obligations undertaken in this Section 6.2. The Company also agrees that it will promptly request each Person that has heretofore executed a confidentiality agreement in connection with its consideration of acquiring it or any of its Subsidiaries to return or destroy all confidential information heretofore furnished to such Person by or on behalf of it or any of its Subsidiaries.

  • Discussion Staff has reviewed the proposal relative to all relevant policies and advise that it is reasonably consistent with the intent of the MPS. Attachment B provides an evaluation of the proposed development agreement in relation to the relevant MPS policies.

  • Settlement Discussions This Agreement is part of a proposed settlement of matters that could otherwise be the subject of litigation among the Parties hereto. Nothing herein shall be deemed an admission of any kind. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 408 and any applicable state rules of evidence, this Agreement and all negotiations relating thereto shall not be admissible into evidence in any proceeding other than to prove the existence of this Agreement or in a proceeding to enforce the terms of this Agreement.

  • Discussions Within 14 days of the date of the notice under Clause 23.2 (Advance Notice) of this article, the Union and the Employer will commence discussions for the purpose of reaching agreement as to the effects of the technological change and in what way, if any, this agreement should be amended.

  • No Existing Discussions As of the date hereof, the Company is not engaged, directly or indirectly, in any discussions or negotiations with any other party with respect to an Acquisition Proposal.

  • Results and Discussion Table 1 (top) shows the root mean square error (RMSE) between the three tests for different numbers of topics. These results show that all three tests largely agree with each other but as the sample size (number of topics) decreases, the agreement decreases. In line with the results found for 50 topics, the randomization and bootstrap tests agree more with the t-test than with each other. We looked at pairwise scatterplots of the three tests at the different topic sizes. While there is some disagreement among the tests at large p-values, i.e. those greater than 0.5, none of the tests would predict such a run pair to have a significant difference. More interesting to us is the behavior of the tests for run pairs with lower p-values. Table 1 (bottom) shows the RMSE among the three tests for run pairs that all three tests agreed had a p-value greater than 0.0001 and less than 0.5. In contrast to all pairs with p-values 0.0001 (Table 1 top), these run pairs are of more importance to the IR researcher since they are the runs that require a statistical test to judge the significance of the per- formance difference. For these run pairs, the randomization and t tests are much more in agreement with each other than the bootstrap is with either of the other two tests. Looking at scatterplots, we found that the bootstrap tracks the t-test very well but shows a systematic bias to produce p-values smaller than the t-test. As the number of topics de- creases, this bias becomes more pronounced. Figure 1 shows a pairwise scatterplot of the three tests when the number of topics is 10. The randomization test also tends to produce smaller p-values than the t-test for run pairs where the t- test estimated a p-value smaller than 0.1, but at the same time, produces some p-values greater than the t-test’s. As Figure 1 shows, the bootstrap consistently gives smaller p- values than the t-test for these smaller p-values. While the bootstrap and the randomization test disagree with each other more than with the t-test, Figure 1 shows that for a low number of topics, the randomization test shows less noise in its agreement with the bootstrap com- pared to the t-test for small p-values.

  • Information Disclosure We will disclose information to third parties about your account or the transactions you make: (1) when it is necessary for completing transactions, or (2) in order to verify the existence and condition of your account for a third party, such as a credit bureau or merchant, or (3) in order to comply with government agency or court orders, or (4) if you give us your written permission.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!