Merit Review Date Sample Clauses

Merit Review Date. If an employee is promoted or demoted to a new position that results in a salary increase or decrease of five percent (5%) or more, then a new anniversary date for current position will be established.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Merit Review Date. An employee’s merit review date is the first day of the pay period following the date of hire, except that those employees hired on the first day of the pay period shall have their date of hire as their merit review date. If an employee is promoted to a new promotional position (Sergeant or above) which results in a salary increase of five percent (5.0%) or more, then a new merit review date will be established for that employee on the same basis as shown above for new employees. The date used to establish the merit review date is known as the anniversary date. All changes in salary shall be effective at the beginning of the pay period.
Merit Review Date. An employee’s merit review date is the first day of the pay period following the date of hire, except that those employees hired on the first day of the pay period shall have their date of hire as their merit review date. If an employee is promoted to a new position which results in a salary increase of five percent (5%) or more, then a new merit review date will be established for that employee on the same basis as shown above for new employees. If an employee accepts a position or is demoted to a position that results in a salary decrease of five percent (5%) or more, a new merit review date will be established on the same basis as shown above for new employees. The advancement of an employee from a new hire “trainee” status to regular employee shall not be considered a promotion and will not establish a new merit review date. The date used to establish the merit review date is known as the anniversary date. All changes in salary shall be effective at the beginning of the next scheduled pay period.
Merit Review Date. An employee’s merit review date is the first day of the pay period following the date of hire, except that those employees hired on the first day of the pay period shall have their date of hire as their merit review date. If an employee is promoted to a new position which results in a salary increase of five percent (5%) or more, then a new merit review date will be established for that employee on the same basis as shown above for new employees. The advancement of an employee from a new hire “trainee” status to regular employee shall not be considered a promotion and will not establish a new merit review date. The date used to establish the merit review date is known as the anniversary date. All changes in salary shall be effective at the beginning of the next scheduled pay period.

Related to Merit Review Date

  • Post Review With respect to each contract not governed by paragraph 2 of this Part, the procedures set forth in paragraph 4 of Appendix 1 to the Guidelines shall apply.

  • Agreement Review If, pursuant to section 25.10 (Review of Agreement) of the Bilateral Agreement, the Bilateral Agreement is reviewed after three or five years, or both, of the effective date of the Bilateral Agreement, and any changes to the Bilateral Agreement are required as a result, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as necessary and in a manner that is consistent with such changes.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Contract Review Agent shall have reviewed all material contracts of Borrowers including, without limitation, leases, union contracts, labor contracts, vendor supply contracts, license agreements and distributorship agreements and such contracts and agreements shall be satisfactory in all respects to Agent;

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Peer Review Dental Group, after consultation with the Joint ----------- Operations Committee, shall implement, regularly review, modify as necessary or appropriate and obtain the commitment of Providers to actively participate in peer review procedures for Providers. Dental Group shall assist Manager in the production of periodic reports describing the results of such procedures. Dental Group shall provide Manager with prompt notice of any information that raises a reasonable risk to the health and safety of Group Patients or Beneficiaries. In any event, after consultation with the Joint Operations Committee, Dental Group shall take such action as may be reasonably warranted under the facts and circumstances.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!