MITC-IAWG Process Initiation Sample Clauses

MITC-IAWG Process Initiation. Transportation Conformity Actionable Events and Lead Agency Roles The MITC-IAWG consultation process is to be initiated and directed by the corresponding lead agency for the following transportation conformity related tasks and events. The designation of a lead agency is determined by legal obligations and professional expertise. Any MITC-IAWG member agency may initiate the consultation process to address pertinent air quality or transportation planning issues related to transportation conformity events. • Development/review of on-road mobile source emissions models and methods - lead agency: USEPA, MDOT, or MPO; • Development/review of travel demand models or any other analytical methods used to predict vehicle miles traveled - lead agency: MPO or MDOT; • Development/review of regionally significant projects and changes - lead agency: MPO; • Development/review of drafts for a new or amended LRTP and TIP; - lead agency: MPO; • Development of conformity determination for a new or amended LRTP and TIP - lead agency: MPO; • Development of conformity determination for projects in non-metropolitan nonattainment and maintenance areas - lead agency: MDOT; • Development of a list of the Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) to be considered in the development/review of draft or revisions to the SIP, if necessary - lead agency: MDEQ; • TCM revisions prepared by the MPO for the MDEQ to be included in the SIP - lead agency: MPO; • Notification of pending transportation conformity lapse - lead agency: FHWA/FTA; • Notification of SIP actions, including those that may lead to nonconformity and/or sanctions – lead agency: USEPA; • Approval of TIPs as Governor's designee for inclusion in the State Transportation Improvement Program - lead agency: MDOT; • Formal conformity determination on the LRTP or TIP through a resolution of the MPO’s body - lead agency: MPO; • Ensures the adequacy of the interagency consultation process with respect to LRTPs, TIPs, and associated conformity analysis - lead agency: MPO; • Conducts project-level conformity analysis regardless of project sponsor - lead agency: MDOT or project applicant; • Accepts the LRTP or TIP and sends them to FHWA and FTA for action - lead agency: MDOT; • Provides comments to FHWA/FTA on the conformity process and results - lead agency: USEPA; • Reviews MDEQ, USEPA, and public comments and makes final conformity determination on the LRTP or TIP through a joint FHWA/FTA letter - lead agency: FHWA/FTA; • Maintains rec...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to MITC-IAWG Process Initiation

  • Joint Network Implementation and Grooming Process Upon request of either Party, the Parties shall jointly develop an implementation and grooming process (the “Joint Grooming Process” or “Joint Process”) which may define and detail, inter alia:

  • Benchmarking Process 2.2.1 The Supplier shall produce and send to the Authority for Approval, a draft plan for the Benchmark Review.

  • Project Initiation i - Upon final execution of the Agreement with the DISTRICT, the ARCHITECT shall: ♦ Review the Program Management Plan (PMP) with the DISTRICT and its representatives to familiarize them with the proposed tasks and schedule and develop necessary modifications. The PMP defines the Program Master Schedule and Budgets and each Project scope and budget.

  • Ordering Process 6.4.1 CLEC, or CLEC's agent, shall act as the single point of contact for its End User Customers' service needs, including without limitation, sales, service design, order taking, Provisioning, change orders, training, maintenance, trouble reports, repair, post-sale servicing, Billing, collection and inquiry. CLEC's End User Customers contacting Qwest in error will be instructed to contact CLEC; and Qwest's End User Customers contacting CLEC in error will be instructed to contact Qwest. In responding to calls, neither Party shall make disparaging remarks about each other. To the extent the correct provider can be determined, misdirected calls received by either Party will be referred to the proper provider of local Exchange Service; however, nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to prohibit Qwest or CLEC from discussing its products and services with CLEC's or Qwest's End User Customers who call the other Party seeking such information.

  • CONTRACTOR STAFF WITHIN AUTHORIZED USER AGREEMENT The provisions of this section shall apply unless otherwise agreed in the Authorized User Agreement. All employees of the Contractor, or of its Subcontractors, who shall perform under an Authorized User Agreement, shall possess the necessary qualifications, training, licenses, and permits as may be required within the jurisdiction where the Services specified are to be provided or performed, and shall be legally entitled to work in such jurisdiction. All Business Entities that perform Services under the Contract on behalf of Contractor shall, in performing the Services, comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws concerning employment in the United States. Staffing Changes within Authorized User Agreement

  • Bidding Process 3.1. Bidding shall generally commence based on the sequence of the lot being shown on the PAH Website. However the Auctioneer has the right to vary the sequence without having to give prior notice to the intended bidders.

  • Initiation and Processing 1. Level One

  • Authorized User Overview and Mini-Bid Process Project Based IT Consulting Services Contracts enable Authorized Users to use a competitive Mini-bid Process to acquire Services on an as-needed basis, for qualified IT Projects. Project Based IT Consulting Services may include, but will not be limited to projects requiring: analysis, data classification, design, development, testing, quality assurance, security and associated training for Information Technology based applications. See section 1.3 Out of Scope Work for a listing of projects expressly excluded from the scope of this Contract. An Authorized User Agreement for Project Based IT Consulting Services will be governed first by the terms and conditions specified in the OGS Centralized Contract and second by terms and conditions added to the Authorized User Statement of Work. Additional terms and conditions shall not conflict with or modify the terms and conditions of the OGS Centralized Contract. NYS Executive Agencies must adhere to all internal processes and approvals including, as required, approval from NYS Office of Information Technology Services. Other Authorized Users must adhere to their own internal processes and approvals. In accordance with Appendix B, section 28, Modification of Contract Terms, an Authorized User may add additional required terms and conditions to this Mini-Bid and resultant Authorized User Agreement only if such terms and conditions (1) are more favorable to the Authorized User and (2) do not conflict with or supersede the OGS Centralized Contract terms and conditions. Examples of additional terms and conditions include: • Expedited delivery timeframe; • Additional incentives, such as discount for expedited payment/Procurement Card use; and • Any additional requirements imposed by the funding source or Federal law.

  • Project Monitoring The Developer shall provide regular status reports to the NYISO in accordance with the monitoring requirements set forth in the Development Schedule, the Public Policy Transmission Planning Process Manual and Attachment Y of the OATT.

  • Hiring Process i. School District and Teach For America will collaborate in good faith to facilitate the efficient hiring of individual Teachers, in accordance with the School District’s established District hiring practices.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.