Modified Selection Procedures Sample Clauses

Modified Selection Procedures. For construction inspection, bridge inspection services, and non- complex or selected moderately complex projects as defined in DM1, the most qualified consultant is selected based on the letters of interest. The municipality will request Technical and Price proposals from this consultant for the purpose of negotiating a Consultant Agreement. Timeframes for Modified Selection Procedures outlined in Section 2.1.2 are recommended for third party agreements. When a project specific agreement is advertised, a firm is eligible to submit an SOI as a prime or subconsultant, only if the following conditions are met:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Modified Selection Procedures. Normally this process takes three to five months. There is a maximum timeframe of 8 months allowed from the date of the advertisement to the date of Agreement Execution. For Agreements advertised before January 31, 2010, the maximum allowed timeframe will be 12 months. [Not meeting these time limitations may require that the project be readvertised.] The CAS Chief has the authority to waive these timeframes in unique circumstances, upon receipt of written request and justification. 2.2 Identifying Need for Consultant Services 2.3.2 2.3.3 2.4 IO publishes Planned Project CAS publishes advertisement Consultants submit SOI’s
Modified Selection Procedures. The IO Consultant Selection Committee uses the submitted SOI for Final Ranking the consultants. This ranking should be in accordance with Section 3.4.

Related to Modified Selection Procedures

  • Selection Procedures In selecting the Loan Assets to be Pledged pursuant to this Agreement, no selection procedures were employed which are intended to be adverse to the interests of the Lenders.

  • Election Procedures Each holder of record of shares of Company Common Stock (“Holder”) shall have the right, subject to the limitations set forth in this Article II, to submit an election in accordance with the following procedures:

  • Application Procedures a) An employee applies for a listing on the system-wide registry through the employee’s Human Resources Department by completing the form in Appendix B.

  • Selection Procedure 10.2.4.1 Internal applicants shall be defined as all applicants with seniority in accordance with Article 12.5.

  • Induction Procedures a) The parties to this Agreement acknowledge that it is in the interests of the industry that all new employees and employers on a building project understand their obligations to this Agreement and are introduced to their jobs in a manner which will help them work safely and efficiently.

  • Alternative Procedures By electing not to use all available Security Procedures (as described above) to initiate and authorize Wire Transfers, Customer acknowledges that it has declined to use other available security procedures, including, but not limited to, security procedures that use a call back feature to verify authorization of Wire Transfers initiated by telephone or facsimile transmission. Wire Notification Procedures‌ Information sent by e-mail is not secure! The bank will attempt to keep non-public information out of the advice by masking fields normally containing account number information. However, because we cannot control the information as it is received by a sending institution, confidential information may appear in parts of the incoming e- mail advice. By selecting this option you expressly agree to be liable for any information contained in such advice. ACH SERVICES‌ ACH Origination‌ The Customer (“Originator”) has requested to initiate electronic fund transfer entries (“Entry” or “Entries”) through the Bank (“Originating Depository Financial Institution” or “ODFI”) for the deposit ("Credit") and/or payment ("Debit") of money to and from the accounts of Receivers maintained at Bank and at other Depository Financial Institutions (“DFIs”), by means of the Automated Clearing House ("ACH.")

  • Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.

  • Evaluation Procedures 7.2.1 Evaluation procedures designed to fairly and adequately assess performance of full- time faculty employees shall be established and reviewed annually by the Vice President, after consultation with appropriate faculty groups at divisional/departmental meetings for their recommendations.

  • Notification Procedures To address non-compliance, the receiving Competent Authority would notify the providing Competent Authority pursuant to Article 5 of the IGA. The notification procedures would differ depending upon whether the receiving Competent Authority seeks to address administrative or other minor errors or significant non-compliance.

  • Time Off for Selection Procedures A regular, limited-term or probationary employee shall be entitled to necessary time off with pay to participate in tests of fitness, examinations and interviews required by the Chief Human Resources Officer during working hours for the purpose of determining eligibility for movement to another class in the County service or transfer from one agency/department to another.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.