MULTIMODAL CORRIDOR ANALYSIS Sample Clauses

MULTIMODAL CORRIDOR ANALYSIS. As the population in the region grows and congestion increases, the long term solutions that are proposed for urban corridors become more complex from a mobility, engineering, and cost perspective. In addition, federal regulations strongly encourage the analysis of multimodal solutions, which include roadway improvements, public transportation, bikeways, and pedestrian facilities. The ENGINEER shall develop alternative scenarios and analyze, compare, and evaluate them through various measures of effectiveness (MOE).  Development of Goals and Objectives for Corridor Analysis – The ENGINEER shall be tasked to give the current physical and operational characteristics of the corridor to be looked at, specific goals and objectives will be determined through a consensus of the stakeholders, including Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), user groups, Xxxxxxxx of Commerce, and other interest groups. Examples of potential goals include mobility enhancement, increased reliability, air quality improvements, economic development, urban form and environmental justice. Existing urban patterns, expressed in current land uses and densities, and travel patterns will play an important role in determining goals.  Development and Derivation of Measure of Effectiveness – The ENGINEER shall develop Measures of Effectiveness (XXXx) to measure strategy effectiveness for the pre-established goals to be achieved from the specific corridor analysis. DocuSign Envelope ID: F5521467-ECBA-4D51-AE58-E0461126F7CF Contract No. 36-6RFP5449 PSoft Contract 6320 These XXXx will adequately compare multimodal alternatives. Thus, they should not be limited to traditional roadway alternative analysis where typically level-of-service (LOS) and average vehicle speeds are considered. True multimodal analysis requires that person-trip performance, such as average person-trip travel time, be determined and evaluated as well.
Sample 1See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
MULTIMODAL CORRIDOR ANALYSIS. As the population in the region grows and congestion increases, the long term solutions that are proposed for urban corridors become more complex from a mobility, engineering, and cost perspective. In addition, federal regulations strongly encourage the analysis of multimodal solutions, which include roadway improvements, public transportation, bikeways, and pedestrian facilities. The ENGINEER shall develop alternative scenarios and analyze, compare, and evaluate them through various measures of effectiveness (MOE). • Development of Goals and Objectives for Corridor Analysis – The ENGINEER shall be tasked to give the current physical and operational characteristics of the corridor to be analyzed, specific goals and objectives should be determined through a consensus of the stakeholders, including Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), user groups, Xxxxxxxx of Commerce, and other interest groups. Examples of potential goals include mobility enhancement, increased reliability, air quality improvements, economic development, urban form and environmental justice. Existing urban patterns, expressed in current land uses and densities, and travel patterns should play an important role in determining goals. • Development and Derivation of Measure of Effectiveness – The ENGINEER shall develop Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) to measure strategy effectiveness for the pre-established goals to be achieved from the specific corridor analysis. DocuSign Envelope ID: FFA39A92-595D-4553-9F3E-2AE0A3A88CFF Contract No. 24-8IDP5009 PS Contract No. 8450 These MOE should adequately compare multimodal alternatives. They should not be limited to traditional roadway alternative analysis where typically level-of- service (LOS) and average vehicle speeds are considered. True multimodal analysis requires that person-trip performance, such as average person-trip travel time, be determined and evaluated. • Development of Alternative Scenarios for the Corridor – The ENGINEER shall, depending on the specific needs and characteristics of the corridor develop and present different scenarios that represent potential multimodal alternatives. The analysis shall include the No-Build scenario as a reference point. Each scenario shall be developed with sufficient engineering and operational detail to allow the travel demand model to simulate the impact of the proposed solutions. • Travel Demand Model (TDM) Forecasts - The ENGINEER shall use the MPO’s travel demand model to test the alternative...
Sample 1See All (4)
MULTIMODAL CORRIDOR ANALYSIS. The Engineer shall develop alternative scenarios and analyze, compare, and evaluate them through various measures of effectiveness (MOE).
Sample 1Sample 2
MULTIMODAL CORRIDOR ANALYSIS. As the population in the region grows and congestion increases, the long term solutions that are proposed for urban corridors become more complex from a mobility, engineering, and cost perspective. In addition, federal regulations strongly encourage the analysis of multimodal solutions, which include roadway improvements, public transportation, bikeways, and pedestrian facilities. The ENGINEER shall develop alternative scenarios and analyze, compare, and evaluate them through various measures of effectiveness (MOE).  Development of Goals and Objectives for Corridor Analysis – The ENGINEER shall be tasked to give the current physical and operational characteristics of the corridor to be looked at, specific goals and objectives will be determined through a consensus of the stakeholders, including Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), user groups, Xxxxxxxx of Commerce, and other interest groups. Examples of potential goals include mobility enhancement, increased reliability, air quality improvements, economic development, urban form and environmental justice. Existing urban patterns, expressed in current land uses and densities, and travel patterns will play an important role in determining goals.  Development and Derivation of Measure of Effectiveness – The ENGINEER shall develop Measures of Effectiveness (XXXx) to measure strategy effectiveness for the pre-established goals to be achieved from the specific corridor analysis. These XXXx will adequately compare multimodal alternatives. Thus, they should not be limited to traditional roadway alternative analysis where typically level-of-service (LOS) and average vehicle speeds are considered. True multimodal analysis requires that person-trip performance, such as average person-trip travel time, be determined and evaluated as well.
Sample 1

Related to MULTIMODAL CORRIDOR ANALYSIS

  • Project Management Plan 1 3.4.1 Developer is responsible for all quality assurance and quality control 2 activities necessary to manage the Work, including the Utility Adjustment Work.

  • STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM If the maximum amount payable to Contractor under this Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at any time thereafter, this section shall apply. Contractor agrees to be governed by and comply with the provisions of §§00-000-000, 00-000-000, 00-000-000, and 00- 000-000, C.R.S. regarding the monitoring of vendor performance and the reporting of contract information in the State’s contract management system (“Contract Management System” or “CMS”). Contractor’s performance shall be subject to evaluation and review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Contract, Colorado statutes governing CMS, and State Fiscal Rules and State Controller policies.

  • Management Plan The Management Plan is the description and definition of the phasing, sequencing and timing of the major Individual Project activities for design, construction procurement, construction and occupancy as described in the IPPA.

  • Configuration Management The Contractor shall maintain a configuration management program, which shall provide for the administrative and functional systems necessary for configuration identification, control, status accounting and reporting, to ensure configuration identity with the UCEU and associated cables produced by the Contractor. The Contractor shall maintain a Contractor approved Configuration Management Plan that complies with ANSI/EIA-649 2011. Notwithstanding ANSI/EIA-649 2011, the Contractor’s configuration management program shall comply with the VLS Configuration Management Plans, TL130-AD-PLN-010-VLS, and shall comply with the following:

  • Quality Management System Supplier hereby undertakes, warrants and confirms, and will ensue same for its subcontractors, to remain certified in accordance with ISO 9001 standard or equivalent. At any time during the term of this Agreement, the Supplier shall, if so instructed by ISR, provide evidence of such certifications. In any event, Supplier must notify ISR, in writing, in the event said certification is suspended and/or canceled and/or not continued.

  • Commercial Operation Date Testing and Modifications Prior to the Commercial Operation Date, the Connecting Transmission Owner shall test the Connecting Transmission Owner’s Attachment Facilities and System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades and Developer shall test the Large Generating Facility and the Developer Attachment Facilities to ensure their safe and reliable operation. Similar testing may be required after initial operation. Developer and Connecting Transmission Owner shall each make any modifications to its facilities that are found to be necessary as a result of such testing. Developer shall bear the cost of all such testing and modifications. Developer shall generate test energy at the Large Generating Facility only if it has arranged for the injection of such test energy in accordance with NYISO procedures.

  • Post-Commercial Operation Date Testing and Modifications Each Party shall at its own expense perform routine inspection and testing of its facilities and equipment in accordance with Good Utility Practice as may be necessary to ensure the continued interconnection of the Large Generating Facility with the Participating TO’s Transmission System in a safe and reliable manner. Each Party shall have the right, upon advance written notice, to require reasonable additional testing of the other Party’s facilities, at the requesting Party’s expense, as may be in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!