Alternative Analysis. Utilize a decision matrix to evaluate the conceptual schematic alternatives and to select a recommended alternative considering various engineering, environmental, socioeconomic, cost, and safety factors. The selection of a recommended alternative will be coordinated with the FBCTRA and various alignment alternatives for Segment C to the south of FM 2759.
Alternative Analysis. Engineer will use the results from the existing conditions assessment, feedback from the City and comments from the neighborhood meetings to prepare graphical concept alternatives addressing the drainage issues occurring in the areas of Xxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxx xxx Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxx/Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx.
a. Engineer shall prepare at least two (2) alternatives for each project area for the purpose of identifying the alignment and scope of future improvements for each area:
i. Develop design alternatives meeting current City drainage requirements;
ii. Identify potential right‐of‐way and or easements necessary for future construction and maintenance of improvement alternatives;
iii. Attend up to four (4) meetings with City staff to discuss potential alternatives;
iv. Prepare exhibits showing plan‐view location of proposed improvement alternatives; and
v. Develop engineer’s opinion of probable cost for each alternative.
b. Detailed survey and design plans for the selected alternatives are not included with this phase of analysis. However, results from the alternative analysis will be used during later detailed plan development to potentially reduce total design time for each project area.
Alternative Analysis. Consultant will provide Landscape Architecture Design services that consist of up to (3) section-perspective views that will be rendered in 3D views. Consultant will attend up to two public meetings to present these concepts.
Alternative Analysis. Based on existing and future “no-build” condition modeling results and each system’s identified flooding problems and future drainage infrastructure needs, improvement measures will be proposed. The improvement measures, including structural and non-structural elements, will be evaluated separately to determine individual effectiveness and impacts. These improvements will then be combined into different alternative plans, which will be evaluated, analyzed, and compared. All improvement measures and alternative plans will be evaluated based on level of protection for existing and future conditions, effectiveness, benefit, constructability, cost, ROW needs, potential upstream/downstream impacts, environmental impacts, multi-purpose/ enhancement capabilities, and public/agency acceptance. The alternative formulation shall consider improvements to reduce the potential flooding impacts and mitigate multiple flood events. Recommendations will be made based on comparison of alternatives that provide measurable reductions in flooding impacts in support of the project’s overall flood mitigation objectives and floodplain management goals. The recommended alternative shall not adversely impact or affect neighboring areas located within or outside of the project area. Additionally, the alternative formulation will consider drainage infrastructure needs to accommodate future roadway and development. The improvements may include drainage ditch improvements to provide storm sewer depth as well as proposed drainage lateral systems (ditch and/or storm sewer) to provide conveyance to main drainage ditches or systems. Each flood mitigation/drainage improvement alternative, cost and benefits will be identified and compared based on an Alternative Ranking Matrix. The components considered for the matrix include, but no limited to: damage reduction for structures (residential, commercial, public facilities, and critical facilities), damage reduction for roadway and crossings, reduction in economic loss (business interruptions and temporary job lost), cost, constructability, maintenance (O&E) cost, structure resilience, environmental impacts, socio-economics, environmental enhancement / green infrastructure, multiple purpose utilization, and ROW impacts. Specifically, quantification of cost will include engineering, permitting, easement and/or property acquisition, capital cost, operation and maintenance, and other costs as applicable. The alternative analysis results will be do...
Alternative Analysis. The ENGINEER shall consider the requirements for construction staging and traffic control throughout the development of schematic design to ensure that the proposed design can be constructed. The ENGINEER shall provide construction phasing assumptions to the County as requested. A comparative assessment will be provided for up to two (2) TCP alternatives. TCP Narrative and Construction Sequence. The ENGINEER shall prepare a Preliminary Construction Narrative and Typical Sections in conjunction with the Geometric Schematic of the Preferred Alternative. Quantity and Cost Estimate. The ENGINEER shall prepare a preliminary planning-level cost estimate for the Preliminary Traffic Control Plan.
Alternative Analysis. The intent of this section is to conduct an intersection control analysis associated with the project intersection as analyzed as part of Section 4.2 based on WSDOT’s ICA approach:
Alternative Analysis. Task
4.1.1 Summarize traffic operations
Alternative Analysis. BPA is considering various transmission and other alternatives to meet their service obligations in eastern Idaho. BPA’s decision whether to participate in and timing associated with participation in the development and construction of the Xxxxxxxx to Xxxxxxxxx Transmission Project may be based on BPA’s evaluation of such alternatives.
Alternative Analysis. The study has reviewed a number of previous analyses on agreement and word order in SA and pointed out that they are not adoptable within Xxxxxxx'x (2005) feature inheritance model. I assume that the proposed feature-based- inheritance analysis can present a good alternative to the preceding null expletive hypothesis (Xxxxxxxx, 1990, 2000) and the null pro hypothesis (Soltan, 2006). Furthermore, the alternative analysis provides a neat account of agreement in SA than that presented in the agreement loss (Xxxx et al, 1994 and Xxxxxxxxx, 2002) and MP merger of the verb and subject (Xxxxxxxxx, 2000a and Xxxx and Xxxxxxxxx, 1999) because these accounts do not offer a satisfactory treatment when I compare them to the analysis in Xxxxxxx'x (2005) feature inheritance approach. Moreover, the proposed analysis shows clearly that agreement asymmetry in SA disappears once I adopt Xxxxxxx'x (2005) feature inheritance framework which illustrates that agreement on the verb (as the result of the Agree relation) is achieved under the probe-goal relation. What is interesting in the proposed account is that agreement does not change when the goal moves or remains in situ. Besides, it accounts for the syntactic behavior of the preverbal subject in SVO order in SA; the preverbal subject moves from Spec-vP to Spec-XxxX via TP to get topicalisation. The subject movement leaves behind a pronounceable copy which is seen as a resumptive pronoun. Before I present the alternative analysis I discuss first the recent developments in Xxxxxxx'x (2005) Agree model, phase theory and feature inheritance framework on the basis of which I base my proposed analysis on agreement in SA. Furthermore, the alternative analysis benefits from Xxxxx'x (1997) Split-CP analysis on the basis of which I suggest a modification of Xxxxxxx'x (2005) clause structure in order to account for the position of the preverbal subject in SVO in SA.
A. Derivational Operations in Minimalist Syntax The operation Agree
Alternative Analysis. The DESIGN PROFESSIONAL shall conduct detailed evaluation of primary and alternative design concepts included in the Exhibit A to recommend the project design to meet or exceed overflow reduction goals within the project area. CSO controls to be evaluated include sewer separation, green infrastructure, in-line and off-line storage, and diversion structure consolidation and/or elimination. Alternative strategies to be developed include but are not limited to:
