Needs Improvement Rating Sample Clauses

Needs Improvement Rating. Within thirty (30) school days of a teacher receiving an evaluation rating of “needs improvement,” the evaluator and teacher shall develop a Professional Development Plan (PDP). The PDP must explicitly address areas of performance that the tenured teacher needs to improve and must take into account the teacher’s ongoing professional responsibilities. The tenured teacher must be evaluated once in the school year following the “needs improvement” rating. If the subsequent evaluation received is equal to or better than “proficient”, then the teacher must be reinstated to the regular evaluation cycle.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Needs Improvement Rating. The “Needs Improvement” rating is only for tenured teachers. The rating indicates there are deficiencies in areas of the District’s expectations for a tenured teacher. When a “
Sample 1
Needs Improvement Rating a. When a teacher is rated Needs Improvement, within 30 school days, the evaluator in consultation with the teacher shall develop a Professional Development Plan (available on the District 62 Intranet). The plan must include the areas that need improvement and the supports provided by the District to address areas identified as needing improvement. b. A teacher who receives a rating of Needs Improvement must be evaluated the subsequent year.
Sample 1
Needs Improvement Rating. All tenured teachers who receive a rating of “Needs Improvement” shall be required to complete a Professional Development Plan (PDP). The PDP must be developed within thirty (30) school days after receiving a Summative Rating of “needs improvement”. A PDP is developed by the Evaluator in consultation with the Teacher and takes into account the Teacher’s ongoing professional responsibilities including his/her regular assignments. The PDP will be directed to the areas that need improvement, and will include a description of the types of evidence that will be accepted to show progress/achievement of a goal as well as supports that the district will provide to address the performance areas needing improvement. The teacher and Evaluator will have ongoing conversations based upon evidence gathered by both Teacher and Evaluator (e.g., Data Logs, reflection forms, lesson planning, student work, formal and informal observations). A minimum of three (3) observations shall be required for the PDP period, of which two (2) must be formal observations. Formal observations include both a pre- and-post observation conference. The teacher will receive a Summative Evaluation at the end of the PDP period. Evaluators will identify strengths and weaknesses based upon formative feedback, planning and reflecting conversations, as well as attendance and subject competency when determining a Summative Evaluation Rating, The PDP period does not have a minimum or maximum timeframe. If the Teacher has corrected the performance areas and receives a rating of “proficient” or “excellent”, he or she is returned to the regular evaluation cycle (PERA 2010.)
Sample 1

Related to Needs Improvement Rating

  • Needs Improvement the Educator’s performance on a standard or overall is below the requirements of a standard or overall, but is not considered to be unsatisfactory at this time. Improvement is necessary and expected.

  • Selection of Subcontractors, Procurement of Materials and Leasing of Equipment The contractor shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or disability in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The contractor shall take all necessary and reasonable steps to ensure nondiscrimination in the administration of this contract. a. The contractor shall notify all potential subcontractors and suppliers and lessors of their EEO obligations under this contract. b. The contractor will use good faith efforts to ensure subcontractor compliance with their EEO obligations.

  • School Improvement 1. The Board and the Association agree that employee participation in decision making is effective in providing positive results for education. 2. The provisions contained in this section shall apply to all school improvement plans, programs or processes set forth by school improvement committees established in the Xxxxxxx-Xxxxxx School District as a result of Section 1277 of the Revised School Code. 3. It is understood that participation on school improvement committees is voluntary. Further, employees who participate, or are non-participants, in such activities shall not be negatively evaluated for any conduct relative to such committees. 4. In the event that any provision(s) of a school improvement plan, program or process or application thereof violates, contradicts, or is inconsistent with this Collective Bargaining Agreement, the Collective Bargaining Agreement shall prevail.

  • Substantial Completion Date Substantial Completion of the Work as defined in Article 6.1.2 of the General Conditions to the Continuing Contract for Construction Management shall be achieved by July 31, 2022.

  • Cost of Repairs 54.1 Loss or damage to the Works or Materials to be incorporated in the Works between the Start Date and the end of the Defects Correction periods shall be remedied by the Contractor at the Contractor's cost if the loss or damage arises from the Contractor's acts or omissions.

  • CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT 3.1 The Supplier shall adopt a policy of continuous improvement in relation to the Services pursuant to which it will regularly review with the Authority the Services and the manner in which it is providing the Services with a view to reducing the Authority's costs (including the Framework Prices), the costs of Contracting Bodies and/or improving the quality and efficiency of the Services. The Supplier and the Authority will provide to each other any information which may be relevant to assisting the objectives of continuous improvement and in particular reducing costs.

  • Quality Improvement VRC shall develop programs designed to improve the quality of care provided by the Radiologists and encourage identification and adoption of best demonstrated processes. Practice and VRC acknowledge that, in connection with such quality improvement activities, it may be necessary to provide VRC with Protected Health Information and Practice and VRC agree to treat such information in accordance with Article 9;

  • Laboratory Testing All laboratories selected by UPS Freight for analyzing Controlled Substances Testing will be HHS certified.

  • Substantial Completion 9.8.1 When the Contractor considers that the Work, or a designated portion thereof which has been accepted in writing to by the State, is substantially complete as defined in Subparagraph

  • Improvement Plan A detailed, written plan collaboratively developed between the teacher and evaluator, utilized when a teacher receives an Evaluation Rating of ineffective. The approved form for the Improvement Plan is attached to this agreement as Appendix .

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!