Other Supporting Justification Sample Clauses

Other Supporting Justification. The Improper Payments Information Act of 2002, Pub. L. 107-300, the Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Act of 2010, Pub. L. 111-204, and the Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Improvement Act of 2012, Pub. L. 112-248, require federal agencies to identify programs susceptible to significant improper payments and to report to Congress on efforts to reduce such payments. The Office of Management and Budget issued implementing guidance to federal agencies in Appendix C to Circular A-123, Requirements for Effective Estimation and Remediation of Improper Payments, (June 26, 2018). The NDNH is a centralized database of wage and employment information and, as such, provides an effective and efficient means to obtain income information, preferable to other means of obtaining the same information. The matching program will assist the state agency in detecting fraud, waste and abuse and will enhance program integrity by strengthening the state agency’s oversight and management of the program. It will serve as a deterrent to some individuals who otherwise may fraudulently apply for and receive TANF benefits, and it will provide information to reduce erroneous payments, which is consistent with requirements of the Improper Payments Information Act , subsequent legislation, and guidance The matching program will also provide useful information on the employment and earnings of TANF applicants and recipients, specifically: 1) those who are employed with the federal government; 2) those who are employed in another state, including those who have been rehired by a previous employer after having been separated from such prior employment for at least 60 consecutive days (Pub. L. 112-40, effective April 21, 2012, amending subsection 453A(a)(2) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 653a(a)(2)); and 3) those whose information that is not readily available through the State Directory of New Hires, state workforce agencies, or other data reporting systems. The matching program also improves the state agency’s ability to report adult TANF applicants’ and recipients’ employment status and earnings and work participation to the Office of Family Assistance, in accordance with subsection 411(a)(1)(A)(iv) and (xi) of the Social Security Act. 42 U.S.C. § 611(a)(1)(A)(iv) and (xi). The positive results of the previous matching programs between the state agency and OCSE further justify the proposed matching program. See section II.C and Appendix A of this agreement.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Other Supporting Justification. The Improper Payments Information Act of 2002, Pub. L. 107-300, the Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Act of 2010, Pub. L. 111-204, and the Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Improvement Act of 2012, Pub. L. 112-248, require federal agencies to identify programs susceptible to significant improper payments and to report to Congress on efforts to reduce such payments. The Office of Management and Budget issued implementing guidance to federal agencies in Appendix C to Circular A-123, Requirements for Effective Estimation and Remediation of Improper Payments, (June 26, 2018). Studies done by XXX confirm that use of NDNH results in earlier detection of improper payments, thus preventing future overpayments and increasing the likelihood of overpayment recovery. DOL mandated use of the NDNH for the Benefit Accuracy Measurement (BAM) program in 2007 (See XXXX Xx. 0-00, Xxxxxx 1) and to detect benefit year earnings overpayments beginning in December 2011 (See UIPL No. 19-11). In June 2019, DOL issued XXXX Xx. 00-00 to recommend operating procedures for the matching program, as well as best practices for states. The mandatory use of NDNH is based on the Department’s administrative authority granted under Section 303(a)(1) of the Social Security Act and Sections 3306(h) and 3304(a)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code. The NDNH is a centralized database of wage and employment information and, as such, provides an effective and efficient means to obtain income information, preferable to other means of obtaining the same information. The matching program will assist the state agency in detecting fraud, waste, and abuse, and will enhance program integrity by strengthening the state agency’s oversight and management of the program. It will serve as a deterrent to some individuals who otherwise may fraudulently apply for and receive UC benefits, and it will provide information to reduce erroneous payments, which is consistent with requirements of the Improper Payments Information Act, subsequent legislation and guidance. The program will also provide useful information on the employment and earnings of UC applicants and recipients, specifically: 1) those who are employed with the federal government; 2) those who are employed in another state, including those who have been rehired by a previous employer after having been separated from such prior employment for at least 60 consecutive days (Pub. L. 112-40, effective April 21, 2012, amending subsection 453A(a)...
Sample 1

Related to Other Supporting Justification

  • Rationale/Justification The Cisco Certified Network Associate Security (CCNA® Security) certification represents industry acknowledgement of technical skill attainment of competencies in the IT Security program.

  • Justification For fishing of marine fish, prawn, and other aquatic organism, different treatment is given to Myanmar citizens according to the provisions of the Myanma Marine Fisheries Law (1990).

  • Justification for the Request The request for a supplemental funding for any of the above-mentioned programs should contain a justification clearly documenting the need for the additional funding authority during the current quarter. This documentation should be in the form of State accounting records or similar documents that will show the actual expenditures through the most recent month for which such data are available, as well as the State's most accurate projection of its anticipated expenditures during the remaining month(s) of the quarter. For either the TANF or the CCDF program, the State's justification should also include an explanation of the activities requiring the obligation and/or expenditure of amounts that exceed the normal quarterly grant award restrictions and why these activities could not have been delayed until the next quarter.

  • Direction to Account Debtors; Contracting Parties; etc Upon the occurrence and during the continuance of an Event of Default, if the Collateral Agent so directs any Assignor, such Assignor agrees (x) to cause all payments on account of the Receivables and Contracts to be made directly to one or more Cash Collateral Accounts (as the Collateral Agent shall so direct), (y) that the Collateral Agent may, at its option, directly notify the obligors with respect to any Receivables and/or under any Contracts to make payments with respect thereto as provided in the preceding clause (x), and (z) that the Collateral Agent may enforce collection of any such Receivables and Contracts and may adjust, settle or compromise the amount of payment thereof, in the same manner and to the same extent as such Assignor. Without notice to or assent by any Assignor, the Collateral Agent may, upon the occurrence and during the continuance of an Event of Default, apply any or all amounts then in, or thereafter deposited in, the Cash Collateral Accounts which application shall be effected in the manner provided in Section 7.4 of this Agreement. The reasonable costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees) of collection, whether incurred by an Assignor or the Collateral Agent, shall be borne by the relevant Assignor. The Collateral Agent shall deliver a copy of each notice referred to in the preceding clause (y) to the relevant Assignor, provided, that the failure by the Collateral Agent to so notify such Assignor shall not affect the effectiveness of such notice or the other rights of the Collateral Agent created by this Section 3.3.

  • Paid Claims without Supporting Documentation Any Paid Claim for which Xxxxxxx cannot produce documentation shall be considered an error and the total reimbursement received by Xxxxxxx for such Paid Claim shall be deemed an Overpayment. Replacement sampling for Paid Claims with missing documentation is not permitted.

  • Agreement Exceptions/Deviations Explanation If the proposing Vendor desires to deviate form the Vendor Agreement language, all such deviations must be listed on this attribute, with complete and detailed conditions and information included. TIPS will consider any deviations in its proposal award decisions, and TIPS reserves the right to accept or reject any proposal based upon any deviations indicated below. In the absence of any deviation entry on this attribute, the proposer assures TIPS of their full compliance with the Vendor Agreement.

  • Supporting Information Each Franchise Fee payment shall be accompanied by a brief report prepared by a representative of Franchisee showing the basis for the computation.

  • Supporting Documentation Upon request, the HSP will provide the LHIN with proof of the matters referred to in this Article.

  • Contractor Certification regarding Boycotting Israel Pursuant to Chapter 2270, Texas Government Code, Contractor certifies Contractor (1) does not currently boycott Israel; and (2) will not boycott Israel during the Term of this Agreement. Contractor acknowledges this Agreement may be terminated and payment withheld if this certification is inaccurate.

  • Regulatory Good Standing Certification - Explanation - Continued If Vendor responded to the prior attribute that "No", Vendor is not in good standing, Vendor must provide an explanation of that lack of good standing here for TIPS consideration.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!