Pavement Evaluation Sample Clauses

Pavement Evaluation. Not in contract.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Pavement Evaluation. The Consultant will perform a brief visual assessment only of the pavement at the bridge approaches. The Consultant will describe the approach pavement condition in the design report.
Sample 1
Pavement Evaluation. (Intentionally left blank)
Sample 1
Pavement Evaluation. GEOCON will evaluate existing pavement and subgrade conditions by performing pavement coring along Xxxxxx Field Road from Folsom Boulevard to the Xxxxxx Field Road and International Drive intersection and provide conclusions and recommendations for repair and/or rehabilitation. Rehabilitation will likely include isolated dig outs and grind/overlay with or without a pavement reinforcement interlayer. GEOCON will perform the following services: Scope of Services ‐ Xxxxxx Field Rehabilitation Contract No. 000-0000-0  A GEOCON senior staff engineer will perform a site visit to observe existing pavement conditions and to pre‐xxxx proposed core locations.  Notify subscribing utility companies via Underground Service Alert (USA) a minimum of two working days (as required by law) prior to performing exploratory excavations at the site.  Obtain an encroachment permit from the City of Rancho Xxxxxxx (assume no fee).  Perform up to 8 pavement cores within the northbound and southbound lanes of Xxxxxx Field Road. Four (4) cores each will be located north and south of US Highway 50 in the northbound and southbound lanes.  Provide necessary traffic control measures during fieldwork.  Measure existing pavement section material thicknesses at the core locations.  Obtain subgrade soil samples from the core locations.  Patch the cores with rapid‐set concrete or cold‐patch asphalt concrete (AC).
Sample 1
Pavement Evaluation. The ENGINEER shall perform a network level investigation to review the pavement inventory from the Pavement Management Information System (PMIS) condition data and to provide high-level assessment of the needs of the pavement sections along the corridor. The network level evaluation shall be based on data collected at the network level by TxDOT as part of the PMIS and is intended for planning, and high-level assessment of the pavement needs. The STATE will provide the following data in a spreadsheet or other usable format for the Engineer’s use in the Pavement Evaluation task:  Corridor pavement Inventory, including PMIS pavement segmentation, pavement types, dimension, number of lanes, etc. within each segment ;  Most recent pavement distress survey and other information from PMIS; DocuSign Envelope ID: 9E4E3B84-8519-409C-AEF8-0383FB0D2E89  Available pavement construction history and maintenance records;  Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) results, recent coring reports, or pavement thicknesses based on GPR reports (if available); and  International Roughness Index (IRI) survey results from the PMIS The ENGINEER shall perform the following subtasks:  Data Review: TxDOT’s PMIS contains a database of the pavement roadway inventory and pavement condition survey data updated annually. The ENGINEER shall review the PMIS inventory and pavement condition. In addition, the ENGINEER shall review construction and maintenance records provided by the STATE.
Sample 1
Pavement Evaluation. With the pavement image collection started, DTS will begin processing pavement images immediately to continue on a prompt delivery. This allows DTS to begin the pavement distress rating process concurrent with the image collection. DTS’ pavement line scan images allow the pavement evaluator to determine the type, extent and severity of pavement distresses. DTS will also use industry standard Crack Scope software to map specific pavement distresses. Longitudinal, transverse and alligator (fatigue) distresses will be initially identified with this automated pavement distress processing software. This software provides an automated distress map of these distresses on each pavement image. Once pavement images and distress mapping processing is complete for each collection day, DTS' experienced pavement evaluators will review each street segment image for a complete and thorough evaluation of the existing pavement condition per the ASTM D6433 pavement distress rating process. DTS' pavement evaluators have the ability to modify, delete or add to the longitudinal, transverse and alligator distress map at any time during the rating process utilizing DTS' remote sensing software EarthShaper™.
Sample 1

Related to Pavement Evaluation

  • Student Evaluation A. All unit members shall be subject to student evaluations each semester in each course taught.

  • Pavement The combined surface course, base course, and subbase course, if any, considered as a single unit.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is experienced and knowledgeable in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, accounting, marketing, land, engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Subject Property and value thereof.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following:

  • Using Student feedback in Educator Evaluation ESE will provide model contract language, direction and guidance on using student feedback in Educator Evaluation by June 30, 2013. Upon receiving this model contract language, direction and guidance, the parties agree to bargain with respect to this matter.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!