Data Review. Customer has sole responsibility for confirming the accuracy and validity of all information, data, entries, and processing services prepared by the Bank and delivered to Customer in connection with the Account. Customer agrees to carefully review all records and other information provided or made available to Customer by the Bank and to report any discrepancies within thirty (30) days of Customer’s receipt of the record or other information showing such discrepancies. Customer’s failure to promptly report to the Bank within such specified time the existence of any discrepancies in any record or other information constitutes Customer’s acceptance of the record or other information as valid and accurate and shall preclude Customer from asserting against the Bank any claims arising from or any loss caused by the discrepancy.
Data Review. If Itron determines that it is necessary to evaluate Customer data to reproduce error conditions not reproducible with Itron’s standard test data sets, Customer will provide Itron with reasonable access to such data. Itron shall not be liable for any delay or failure to resolve the problem if access to such Customer data is denied to Itron.
Data Review. Within [***] of the expert’s disclosure of the blinded identity of any Validated Celera Antigen Target pursuant to Section 3.3, Celera shall deliver to SGI the Coded Data for any Validated Celera Antigen Target that is not contained on the list of SGI Targets. Within [***] of the receipt of any Coded Data, SGI will notify Celera whether Celera should deliver to SGI the Celera Validation Data for the corresponding target. Celera will have [***] from its receipt of an affirmative notice from SGI to deliver such Celera Validation Data to SGI (the “Affirmative Notice”). Such Celera Validation Data shall contain the [***]. SGI shall complete the review of such Celera Validation Data within [***] of SGI’s receipt of the Coded Data (the “Review Period”).
Data Review. We will review pertinent data and information received from the various entities mentioned above and incorporate industry and regulatory codes and standards into the preliminary and final designs for the project.
Data Review. InterCept shall notify Customer upon the completion of data conversion. Customer agrees to review and check the converted data within 10 days following such notice and provision of the data files to Customer. InterCept reserves the right to postpone conversion of Customer’s information files if Customer is late in delivering its conversion input information or if any other circumstances arise that might jeopardize the successful completion of Customer’s information conversion or the processing of the following days transactions for any other customers of InterCept.
Data Review. You have sole responsibility for confirming the accuracy and validity of all information, data, entries, and processing services prepared by us and delivered to you in connection with any Service. You agree to carefully review all records and other information provided or made available to you by us and to report any discrepancies within 30 days of your statement date. For purposes of this section, "discrepancies" include, but are not limited to, missing deposits; missing, stolen or unauthorized checks or other withdrawal orders; checks or other withdrawal orders bearing an unauthorized signature, endorsement, or alteration; illegible images; encoding errors made by you or us; and counterfeit. Your failure to promptly report to us within such specified time the existence of any discrepancies in any record or other information constitutes your acceptance of the record or other information as valid and accurate and shall preclude you from asserting against Bank any claims arising from or any loss caused by the discrepancy.
Data Review. The Consultant shall review the drafted, tiered process piping list provided by the City and recommend a comprehensive approach to assess all the process piping at the CBWTP by the end of the five-year program duration. The following data will be provided by City:
a. Pipe characteristics
b. Project as-built drawings
c. Maintenance/cleaning/failure history
d. Process area operational and hydraulic data
e. Upstream system information
f. Other site-specific documentation
Data Review. The Engineer will review information collected from the Design Engineer (Murraysmith) and City staff in preparation for the workshop. The Engineer will also prepare rough cost and energy models to utilize during the workshop to provide feedback to the value analysis team. • Provide the 2016 Wastewater Facilities Plan, Schematic Design Report and appendices including the NPDES permit, and the 60% design package including drawings, specifications, and Engineer’s opinion of probable construction costs (OPCC). • Provide any additional documents, such as record drawings, operation and maintenance costs, and other existing reports, that may be helpful for the Value Analysis. • Arrange for desired City staff and Design Engineer staff to attend the Value Analysis Workshop targeted to take place the week of November 30th.
Data Review. Data review will be used to ensure that the requirements stated in the planning documents (e.g., the SAP, SOPs, and this QAPP), are implemented as required. Data review is an ongoing process of assessing data and data collection activities for compliance with the planning documents. As such, the data review process will begin as part of the implementation (data collection) phase of the survey. The individual responsible for data review during the implementation phase of the survey is the Senior Radiological Engineer. Individuals performing field survey activities, however, should be aware of data review requirements and should assist in identifying and documenting problems and deficiencies as they are discovered. Following the survey implementation phase, any individuals performing review and assessment of the survey data are responsible for data review. Data review, in general, is accomplished by reviewing and monitoring data and data collection activities for compliance with the requirements of the planning documents, and documenting and reporting any problems and/or deficiencies. The following activities and data, at a minimum, must be continually assessed during the data life cycle. Problems and/or deficiencies must be documented, and reported as they occur to the Project Manager. The Senior Radiological Engineer will monitor data collection activities that are governed by the requirements of an operating procedure. The Senior Radiological Engineer, using daily quality control checks of instrument background and response, shall monitor the performance of field measurement systems. Daily quality control checks will consist of exposing the instrument to sources of known radioactivity and evaluating their response relative to a value predetermined immediately following instrument calibration. Instrument response must be within 20% of the expected value or the instrument will not be used. This information will be included in the SOP for each instrument to which it applies. Review of analytical laboratory data will be accomplished by ensuring that results have been returned for all samples, proper analytical and field methods have been used, analyses have been performed for the desired radionuclide parameters using proper analytical methods, and the requirements of the laboratory have been met. Review of field measurement data will consist of establishing that data are recorded correctly, field instruments have been properly calibrated, and survey forms...