Person Throughput Trends Sample Clauses

Person Throughput Trends. ‌ Figure 17 provides person throughput on both the managed lanes and the entire facility between 2006 and 2009, by multiplying the peak period AVO values presented in Table 13 above by peak period traffic volumes provided by FDOT. Southbound person throughput is provided for the AM peak period (7 to 9am) and northbound person throughput is provided for the PM peak period (4 to 6pm). 2009 person throughput information is only available in the northbound direction. The corresponding Table 14 compares the person throughput figures from 2008 and 2009 broken out by vehicle type. Figure 17 - Person Throughput Trends – South of Golden Glades Table 14 Person Throughput by Vehicle Type in Managed Lanes 2008 vs 2009 (Northbound; PM Peak Period – 4 to 6pm) Vehicle Type Managed Lanes (Total Person Vol per Peak Period) Facility (Total Person Vol per Peak Period) 2008 2009 % Change 2008 2009 % Change SOV 1,061 3,778 256.1% 9,141 12,206 33.5% HOV 2 3,040 1,899 -37.5% 10,437 8,181 -21.6% HOV 3 477 171 -64.2% 2,335 2,558 9.6% Transit 810 821 1.4% 810 821 1.4% Total 5,387 6,669 23.8% 22,723 23,766 4.6% Figure 17 shows that northbound person throughput on the managed lanes has increased between 2008 and 2009 from 5,387 to 6,669 (23.8 percent increase) persons per peak period, which contrasts the unchanged person throughput between 2006 and 2008, suggesting that the observed increase is likely to be due to northbound Express Lanes implementation. Table 13 shows that this increase is due to a dramatic increase in Single Occupant Vehicles (SOVs) within the managed lanes (though SOVs were not technically allowed in the HOV lanes prior to Express Lanes implementation, clearly violation rates were high). It should also be noted that an extra lane of capacity was added to the facility. Transit person throughput was measured at an increase of only 1.4 percent, which is markedly different to the 30 percent ridership increase discussed in Section 6.1, though these two figures are not directly comparable due to differences in collection method (one day sample versus monthly average), time period (PM Peak period only versus all day), and direction (northbound only versus both directions). It can also be seen from Table 14 that HOV2 and HOV3 person throughput in the managed lanes decreased significantly between 2008 and 2009, due to the raising of the occupancy level for two to three persons per vehicle, and due to the more restrictive registration requirements. Interestingly, HOV3 volum...
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Person Throughput Trends

  • Direct Trunked Transport 7.3.2.1 Either Party may elect to purchase direct trunked transport from the other Party.

  • Contract Quantity The Contract Quantity during each Contract Year is the amount set forth in the applicable Contract Year in Section D of the Cover Sheet (“Delivery Term Contract Quantity Schedule”), which amount is inclusive of outages.

  • Interconnection Point The Service Provider is responsible for connecting to the LFC Network at the Interconnection Point. The LFC may only change an Interconnection Point if a change is necessary to protect the security or integrity of that Interconnection Point in order to maintain the continuity of supply of the Wholesale Services. In the event of any such change:

  • One-Way Interconnection Trunks 2.3.1 Where the Parties have agreed to use One-Way Interconnection Trunks for the delivery of traffic from PCS to Verizon, PCS, at PCS’s own expense, shall:

  • Two-Way Interconnection Trunks 2.4.1 Where the Parties have agreed to use Two-Way Interconnection Trunks for the exchange of traffic between Verizon and VarTec, VarTec shall order from Verizon, and Verizon shall provide, the Two-Way Interconnection Trunks and the Entrance Facility, on which such Trunks will ride, and transport and multiplexing, in accordance with the rates, terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and Verizon’s applicable Tariffs.

  • Delivery Point (a) All Energy shall be Delivered hereunder by Seller to Buyer at the Delivery Point. Seller shall be responsible for the costs of delivering its Energy to the Delivery Point consistent with all standards and requirements set forth by the FERC, ISO-NE, the Interconnecting Utility and any other applicable Governmental Entity and any applicable tariff.

  • Interconnection Points 8.5.1 The IP of a Party (“Receiving Party”) for Measured Internet Traffic delivered to the Receiving Party by the other Party shall be the same as the IP of the Receiving Party for Reciprocal Compensation Traffic under Section 7.1 above.

  • ESTIMATED QUANTITIES 1.1 The quantities set forth in the line items and specification document are approximate and represent the estimated requirements for the contract period.

  • COSTS DISTRIBUTED THROUGH COUNTYWIDE COST ALLOCATIONS The indirect overhead and support service costs listed in the Summary Schedule (attached) are formally approved as actual costs for fiscal year 2020-21, and as estimated costs for fiscal year 2022-23 on a “fixed with carry-forward” basis. These costs may be included as part of the county departments’ costs indicated effective July 1, 2022, for further allocation to federal grants and contracts performed by the respective county departments.

  • Delivery Points ‌ Project water made available to the Agency pursuant to Article 6 shall be delivered to the Agency by the State at the delivery structures established in accordance with Article 10.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!