Phase 4 – Reasonableness Determination of Submitted Price Sample Clauses

Phase 4 – Reasonableness Determination of Submitted Price. D.8.4.1 ORS 279B.060 permits ODF to award Agreements in response to Proposals that are determined by ODF to be the most advantageous to ODF based on the evaluation process and evaluation factors described in the RFP. In addition, ORS 279B.100 permits the rejection of a Proposal when the rejection is in the best interest of ODF as determined by ODF. When the RFP specifies or authorizes the award of multiple public contracts, as is the case in this RFP, ODF may award public contracts to the Proposers who qualify for the award of an Agreement under the terms of the RFP. D.8.4.2 Agencies and public employees that manage the public’s dollars are obliged to spend those dollars wisely. ODF takes its obligations to spend wisely very seriously and has endeavored at all times to exercise financial prudence and responsibility in expending public funds for public purposes. ODF intends to continue the exercise of such prudence and responsibility in connection with the award of Agreements to Proposers arising out of this procurement. In the difficult economic times currently facing the State of Oregon, the necessity of ODF and other entities comprising Government to exercise such prudence and responsibility is even more critical. To meet the obligations stated above, Phase 4 of the evaluation process will involve the evaluation of Prices offered by Proposers in the context of a number of factors, including the range of Prices offered by all Proposers, the prices paid by government and private entities in obtaining similar services in this area or other areas of the United States, the funds available to ODF and other Governmental entities to provide for the Services to be procured by this RFP, and any other information relevant to the determination of price reasonableness in obtaining the required Services through this procurement. D.8.4.3 Accordingly, in this Phase 4 of the evaluation process, ODF will review all of the Prices submitted by Proposers on the Preliminary Best Value List in the context of the factors described in Section D.8.4.2 for the purpose of determining, in the sole discretion of ODF, whether the Price offered by any Proposer is excessive. XXX believes that the award of an Agreement to a Proposer that offers an excessive Price is not advantageous to or in the best interests of ODF. Therefore, if ODF determines that a Price offered by a Proposer is excessive, the Proposal will be rejected and will not receive an Agreement. ODF utilized this review proc...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Phase 4 – Reasonableness Determination of Submitted Price

  • INDEPENDENT PRICE DETERMINATION 6.1 By signing and submitting this bid, the Bidder certifies that the prices in this bid have been arrived at independently, without consultation, communication or agreement, for the purpose of restricting competition, as to any matter relating to such prices with any other Bidder or with any competitor; unless otherwise required by law, the prices which have been quoted in this bid have not been knowingly disclosed by the Bidder prior to bid opening directly or indirectly to any other Bidder or to any competitor; no attempt has been made, or will be made, by the Bidder to induce any person or firm to submit, or not to submit, a bid for the purpose of restricting competition.

  • Board Determination The Board of Directors of Pubco has unanimously determined that the terms of the Exchange are fair to and in the best interests of Pubco and its shareholders.

  • Minimum Call-Back Time All employees who are called out and required to work in an emergency outside their regular working hours shall be paid for a minimum of two (2) hours at overtime rates and shall be paid from the time they leave home to report for duty until the time they arrive back upon proceeding directly from work.

  • Market Adjustment The parties to this Agreement recognize the appropriateness of market pay adjustments in rare instances for compelling reasons. To effectuate judgments in such cases, the President and AAUP Chapter President, in consultation, shall each name three (3) individuals to a university Market Evaluation Committee. Deans may submit recommendations for market pay adjustments with supporting written reasons to the Committee. Said Committee shall consult with the President concerning proposed market pay adjustments reporting its advice not later than May 15 in each year. Upon the favorable recommendation of the President and the BOR President, market pay adjustments may be approved effective at the beginning of that pay period including September 1 of the following year. Not more than one (1) market pay adjustment per one hundred (100) full-time members, or fraction thereof, may be recommended in any contract year. A member’s salary may not be increased beyond the maximum for the rank. Funding for this program shall be governed by Article 12.10.2.

  • Standards for Determining Commercial Reasonableness Borrower and Silicon agree that a sale or other disposition (collectively, "sale") of any Collateral which complies with the following standards will conclusively be deemed to be commercially reasonable: (i) Notice of the sale is given to Borrower at least seven days prior to the sale, and, in the case of a public sale, notice of the sale is published at least seven days before the sale in a newspaper of general circulation in the county where the sale is to be conducted; (ii) Notice of the sale describes the collateral in general, non-specific terms; (iii) The sale is conducted at a place designated by Silicon, with or without the Collateral being present; (iv) The sale commences at any time between 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m; (v) Payment of the purchase price in cash or by cashier's check or wire transfer is required; (vi) With respect to any sale of any of the Collateral, Silicon may (but is not obligated to) direct any prospective purchaser to ascertain directly from Borrower any and all information concerning the same. Silicon shall be free to employ other methods of noticing and selling the Collateral, in its discretion, if they are commercially reasonable.

  • Average Log Length and Payment Reduction If the average log length for all logs delivered under this contract is less than the average log length specified in the table in clause G-024.2, The amount of allowable payment reduction shall be calculated by multiplying the payment rate in P-028.2 by the total volume delivered, and the difference between the average length of logs delivered and the average log length specified in G-024.2, times 1% as follows: Log Length Payment Reduction = (B x V x L) x (.01) Where: B = Bid rate from P-028.2 clause V = total delivered log Volume L = Length in feet below specified average (rounded to nearest Average log length payment reductions calculated by the Purchaser must be approved by the State, prior to payment for the final billing period. Third-party scaling organization information is required to determine Xxxxxxxx mbf and Average log length for payment reduction purposes. Average log length is determined on a piece count basis. Value of log length price reduction will be derived from the applicable sort value as described in this contract. Scale information for determining Average log length for payment reduction eligibility must be obtained from roll-out scale. Truck-ramp, sample scaling, and/or bundle scaling information is not acceptable for determining eligibility. Purchaser’s exclusive remedy for below average log lengths shall be the payment reduction described in this clause, notwithstanding other provisions in the Uniform Commercial Code.

  • Determination by Independent Firm In the event of any question arising with respect to the adjustments provided for in this Article 4 such question shall be conclusively determined by an independent firm of chartered accountants other than the Auditors, who shall have access to all necessary records of the Corporation, and such determination shall be binding upon the Corporation, the Warrant Agent, all holders and all other persons interested therein.

  • Failure to Determine Values If the Borrower shall fail to determine the value of any Portfolio Investment as at any date pursuant to the requirements of the foregoing sub-clauses (A), (B) or (C), then the “Value” of such Portfolio Investment as at such date shall be deemed to be zero.

  • Good Faith Determination The Company shall from time to time make the good faith determination whether or not it is practicable for the Company to obtain and maintain a policy or policies of insurance with reputable insurance companies providing the officers and directors of the Company with coverage for losses incurred in connection with their services to the Company or to ensure the Company’s performance of its indemnification obligations under this Agreement.

  • Company Determination Final Any determination that the Company or the Board of Directors must make pursuant to this Article is conclusive.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!