Plans for Future Evaluation. (1) Indicators for Future Evaluation (a) Average traffic volume per day over one year (vehicles/day) (for each section between interchanges) (b) Economic Internal Rate of Return (EIRR) (%) (2) Timing of Next Evaluation Two years after project completion
Plans for Future Evaluation. (1) Indicators for Future Evaluation As described in (1) Quantitative Effects in 4. Targeted Outcomes.
Plans for Future Evaluation. (1) Indicators for Future Evaluation (a) Facility utilization rate (%) (b) Load rejection (MW) (c) Voltage drop ratio (%) (2) Timing of Next Evaluation After project completion
Plans for Future Evaluation. (1) Indications for future evaluation <Water supply>
Plans for Future Evaluation. (1) Indicators for Future Evaluation (a) Area benefited from the project (ha) (b) Cropping Intensity (%/year) (c) Rice production (ton/year) (d) Rice Yield (ton/ha/season) (e) Rate of WUA Presence (%) (f) Economic internal rate of return (2) Timing of Next Evaluation Five years after project completion
Plans for Future Evaluation. (1) Indicators for Future Evaluation (a) Total number of sub-loans (b) Total value of sub-loans (million yen) (c) Emission standards clearance rate (%) (2) Timing of Next Evaluation After project completion Indicator Target (2013 [2 years after completion of project]) Total number of sub-loans 50-75 Total value of sub-loans (million yen) 4,720
Plans for Future Evaluation. The Project has already conducted a well test on the drilled xxxxx and supported the transfer to ENDE of evaluation technologies for resource development. It will also provide further technological support through the provision of consulting services to ensure that resource evaluations are conducted appropriately.
Plans for Future Evaluation. (1) Indicators for Future Evaluation 1） Annual Average Cropping intensity (%/year)
Plans for Future Evaluation. (1) Indicators to be used Qualitative data indicating recovery of the original status before disaster (basically equivalent to the specifications of the relevant facility)
Plans for Future Evaluation. (1) Indicators to be Used Quantitative data to demonstrate recovery to the pre-disaster level (basically equivalent to the design specifications of the relevant facilities) (2) Timing Two years after project completion
