Position Description Review/Classification Procedure Sample Clauses

Position Description Review/Classification Procedure. A. Employee Request for PD Review Any employee who feels that they are performing duties outside the scope of their PD, or that the PD is otherwise inaccurate, will make a written request to their immediate supervisor that the position be reviewed. The total aggregate timeframe for the process in (1)–(3) below will not exceed 45 days, unless mutually agreed in writing. 1. Employee submits request for PD review along with a summary of inaccuracies and/or additional duties not described to their immediate supervisor. The employee and supervisor will discuss whether or not to submit a new PD. 2. If the supervisor agrees that the PD is inaccurate, a proposed PD will be prepared by the supervisor, and the employee will be promptly provided with copies of all other documents the employee must complete. In preparing the proposed PD, the supervisor will consider the employee’s written and oral comments, if applicable. If further modifications of the proposed PD occur prior to classification, the supervisor will discuss the changes with the employee. Agency documents to be completed by employees as part of the PD review will be clear, concise, understandable, and similar for all employees and posted on the Classification section of the HRM website. 3. After the proposed PD and required documents are completed, the PD review package will be submitted to HRM by the supervisor for classification. A copy of the review package will be given to the employee. B. Management initiated PD Review: When a PD review is initiated by Management (for example, new classification standards or supervisor perceives a change in duties), the supervisor will discuss proposed changes to the PD and will consider feedback from the employee prior to submitting the PD review package to HRM for classification. The employee and supervisor will complete the applicable documents required to provide a complete PD Review Package. C. If the employee and supervisor do not agree on the accuracy of the PD, the employee may grieve the accuracy of the PD in accordance with Article 23. D. For all PD reviews, Management will communicate the classification determination to the employee within 60 days from the time the completed PD review package was submitted for classification. The employee will be given a copy of the reclassified PD, cover sheet, and, if applicable, the classifier’s evaluation statement. E. The employee may have Union representation during any discussions between the employee and supervis...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (9)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Position Description Review/Classification Procedure. Employee Request for PD Review (excluding Research Scientist positions): Any employee who feels that they are performing duties outside the scope of their PD, or that the PD is otherwise inaccurate, may make a written request to their immediate supervisor that the position be reviewed. The total aggregate timeframe for the process in (1)-(3) below will not exceed 45 days, unless mutually agreed in writing.
Sample 1Sample 2
Position Description Review/Classification Procedure a. Employee Request for PD Review (excluding Research Scientist positions): Any employee who feels that they are performing duties outside the scope of their PD, or that the PD is otherwise inaccurate, may make a written request to their immediate supervisor that the position be reviewed. The total aggregate timeframe for the process in (1)–(3) below will not exceed 45 days, unless mutually agreed in writing. (1) Employee submits request for PD review along with a summary of inaccuracies and/or additional duties not described to their immediate supervisor. The employee and supervisor will discuss whether or not to submit a new PD. (2) If the supervisor agrees that the PD is inaccurate, a proposed PD will be prepared, and the employee will be promptly provided with copies of all other documents the employee must complete. In preparing the proposed PD, the supervisor will consider the employee’s written and oral comments, if applicable. If further modifications of the proposed PD occur prior to classification, the supervisor will discuss the changes with the employee. Agency documents to be completed by employees as part of the PD review will be clear, concise, understandable, and similar for all employees and posted on the Classification section of the HRM website. (3) After the proposed PD and required documents are completed, the PD review package will be submitted to HRM by the supervisor for classification. A copy of the review package will be given to the employee.
Sample 1
Position Description Review/Classification Procedure a. Employee Request for Position Description Review: Any employee who feels that he or she is performing duties outside the scope of his or her position description, or that the position description is otherwise inaccurate, may make a written request to his or her immediate supervisor that the position be reviewed. The employee shall make a summary of the inaccuracies and/or additional duties not described. Discussion with the supervisor and a determination on whether or not to submit a new position description will be concluded within 30 days of the employee’s request for review. If the position description is found to be inaccu- rate, a new position description will be prepared and submitted for classification by the end of this 30-day period. In conducting such reviews, the supervisor will consider the employee’s written and oral comments. b. When a position description review is initiated by Management (e.g., new classification standards or supervisor perceives a change in duties), the supervi- sor will discuss proposed changes to the position description and will consider feedback from the employee, prior submitting the new position description for classification. c. When a position description is submitted for classification, Management will communicate the classification determination to the employee within 60 days from the time the position description was submitted for classification. d. The employee may have Union representation during any discussions related to the review and classification. e. If the employee is not satisfied with the results of the review procedure, he or she may grieve the accuracy of the position description in accordance with Article 9. Classification appeals are addressed in Section 4 below. f. Management shall refrain from temporarily reassigning an employee’s work during the position description review if the sole purpose for reassigning the work is to avoid reclassification of the employee’s position.
Sample 1

Related to Position Description Review/Classification Procedure

  • Classification Review Grand Valley State University and APSS shall jointly determine the review assessment survey instrument to be used at Grand Valley State University. The parties shall maintain a Joint Review Committee, composed of three members appointed by the Human Resources Office and three members appointed by the Alliance. Bargaining unit members questioning the assigned classification of their position may do so by using the following procedure: A. Meet with the Employment Manager in the Human Resources Office to discuss the review process, changes in their job responsibilities, duties and any other process questions they may have. B. PSS member will fill out the assessment survey and email to the Employment Manager along with any other documentation that supports the request. The survey instrument will be jointly administered/reviewed by the Assessment Team (consisting of the Employment Manager and an Alliance member of the Joint Review Committee). A meeting with the PSS is scheduled for a verbal review of the documentation and to answer any questions the Assessment Team may have. The supervisor or appointing officer is encouraged to attend. If the Assessment Team believes a job site visit is warranted as a result of the survey information, they will schedule a time for a joint visit. C. The completed survey instrument shall be coded. The survey results, as determined by the Assessment Team, shall be shared with the survey participant. D. After receiving the survey results, the survey participant, if they so choose shall have the opportunity to meet with the Joint Review Committee for additional input and appeal. Any additional information shall be reviewed by the Committee, and where the Committee feels it is necessary, the survey will be recoded, in a manner mutually agreeable. E. The Joint Review Committee shall then deliberate as to the merit of the upgrade requested by the participant. If the Committee is not able to reach a consensus, the University will decide on the classification. The Alliance may appeal that decision through the arbitration procedure of the collective bargaining agreement. Professional Support Staff members may engage in the review process no more than once per year. Supervisors questioning the assigned classification of a staff member’s position shall provide supporting rationale, complete an assessment survey instrument and discuss with Manager of Employment. The Manager of Employment shall notify an Alliance Representative that a Supervisor is reviewing a staff member’s classification. The review and outcome shall be completed within 45 working days unless the Alliance Representative and Manager of Employment mutually agreed to an extension. The Alliance will be provided with the scored instrument and any supporting rationale.

  • Claims Review Methodology ‌‌ a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject‌‌ to the Quarterly Claims Review.

  • Review Procedure If the Plan Administrator denies part or all of the claim, the claimant shall have the opportunity for a full and fair review by the Plan Administrator of the denial, as follows:

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Conformity Assessment Procedures 1. Each Party shall give positive consideration to accepting the results of conformity assessment procedures of other Parties, even where those procedures differ from its own, provided it is satisfied that those procedures offer an assurance of conformity with applicable technical regulations or standards equivalent to its own procedures. 2. Each Party shall seek to enhance the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures conducted in the territories of other Parties with a view to increasing efficiency, avoiding duplication and ensuring cost effectiveness of the conformity assessments. In this regard, each Party may choose, depending on the situation of the Party and the specific sectors involved, a broad range of approaches. These may include but are not limited to: (a) recognition by a Party of the results of conformity assessments performed in the territory of another Party; (b) recognition of co-operative arrangements between accreditation bodies in the territories of the Parties; (c) mutual recognition of conformity assessment procedures conducted by bodies located in the territory of each Party; (d) accreditation of conformity assessment bodies in the territory of another Party; (e) use of existing regional and international multilateral recognition agreements and arrangements; (f) designating conformity assessment bodies located in the territory of another Party to perform conformity assessment; and (g) suppliers’ declaration of conformity. 3. Each Party shall exchange information with other Parties on its experience in the development and application of the approaches in Paragraph 2(a) to (g) and other appropriate approaches with a view to facilitating the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures. 4. A Party shall, upon request of another Party, explain its reasons for not accepting the results of any conformity assessment procedure performed in the territory of that other Party.

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by agreement, shall be reviewed by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days after issuance of the final audit report, CONSULTANT may request a review by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration of unresolved audit issues. The request for review will be submitted in writing. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by ALAMEDA CTC will excuse CONSULTANT from full and timely performance, in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT and subconsultants’ contracts, including cost proposals and ICRs, may be subject to audits or reviews such as, but not limited to, an AGREEMENT Audit, an Incurred Cost Audit, an ICR Audit, or a certified public accountant (“CPA”) ICR Audit Workpaper Review. If selected for audit or review, the AGREEMENT, cost proposal and ICR and related workpapers, if applicable, will be reviewed to verify compliance with 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31 and other related laws and regulations. In the instances of a CPA ICR Audit Workpaper Review it is CONSULTANT’s responsibility to ensure federal, state, or local government officials are allowed full access to the CPA’s workpapers including making copies as necessary. The AGREEMENT, cost proposal, and ICR shall be adjusted by CONSULTANT and approved by ALAMEDA CTC to conform to the audit or review recommendations. CONSULTANT agrees that individual terms of costs identified in the audit report shall be incorporated into the contract by this reference if directed by ALAMEDA CTC at its sole discretion. Refusal by CONSULTANT to incorporate audit or review recommendations, or to ensure that the federal, state, or local governments have access to CPA workpapers, will be considered a breach of contract terms and cause for termination of the AGREEMENT and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Evaluation Procedure The procedural requirements set forth in this agreement which conform with and provide specificity to the statutory obligations established by Ohio Rev. Code § 3319.111 and § 3319.112.

  • Completion of Review for Certain Review Receivables Following the delivery of the list of the Review Receivables and before the delivery of the Review Report by the Asset Representations Reviewer, the Servicer may notify the Asset Representations Reviewer if a Review Receivable is paid in full by the Obligor or purchased from the Issuer in accordance with the terms of the Basic Documents. On receipt of such notice, the Asset Representations Reviewer will immediately terminate all Tests of the related Review Receivable, and the Review of such Review Receivables will be considered complete (a “Test Complete”). In this case, the related Review Report will indicate a Test Complete for such Review Receivable and the related reason.

  • Claims and Review Procedure In the event that any claim for benefits that must initially be submitted in writing to the Board of Directors, is denied (in whole or in part) hereunder, the claimant shall receive from First Charter a notice of denial in writing within 60 days, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for denial, with specific reference to pertinent provisions of this Supplemental Agreement. Any disagreements about such interpretations and construction shall be submitted to an arbitrator subject to the rules and procedures established by the American Arbitration Association. The arbitrator shall be acceptable to both First Charter and the Executive (or Beneficiary); if the parties cannot agree on a single arbitrator, the disagreement shall be heard by a panel of three arbitrators, with each party to appoint one arbitrator and the third to be chosen by the other two. No member of the Board of Directors shall be liable to any person for any action taken under Article VIII except those actions undertaken with lack of good faith.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!